You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ We demonstrate a full execution of the resentencing eligibility model (https://g
## Output
This cohort simply meets the sample eligibility criteria. There is no certainty that these individuals are falsely incarcerated or harshly sentenced. Such determinations require complex case reviews by attorneys.
The selection process does not account for age-related criteria since CDCR denied sharing individual birthdays. Age is a pertinent factor, however, in PIR eligibility in some counties. The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, for example, reviews adult cases if the individual is over the age of 50 differently from juvenile cases if the offense was committed at age 14 or 15 (https://github.com/redoio/resentencing_data_initiative/eligibility_model/code/offense_classification/county/los_angeles)
The selection process does not account for age-related criteria since CDCR denied sharing individual birthdays. Age is a pertinent factor, however, in PIR eligibility in some counties. The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, for example, reviews adult cases (over the age of 50) differently from juvenile cases (sentenced at age 14 or 15) (https://github.com/redoio/resentencing_data_initiative/eligibility_model/code/offense_classification/county/los_angeles)
