Fix test with issue hidden due to optional client name

[sazzad16]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.02 ⚠️

Comparison is base (3e8a584) 67.05% compared to head (0f3d852) 67.04%.

❗ Current head 0f3d852 differs from pull request most recent head e984c6b. Consider uploading reports for the commit e984c6b to get more accurate results

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3357      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     67.05%   67.04%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     4656     4655       -1     
============================================
  Files           263      263              
  Lines         15072    15072              
  Branches        947      947              
============================================
- Hits          10107    10105       -2     
- Misses         4557     4558       +1     
- Partials        408      409       +1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[yangbodong22011]

TODO: do it without the help of pool config; from Connection constructor? (configurable) force ping?

I don't think we need to do much about it.

If the user's JedisPoolConfig does not configure the correct password, it is normal to return NOAUTH in subsequent requests.