-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix some flaky tests #5586
Fix some flaky tests #5586
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for odo-docusaurus-preview canceled.
|
@anandrkskd Could you please increase the number of nodes on this cluster?
|
a3d5dbd
to
2e5240e
Compare
/test v4.10-integration-e2e |
1 similar comment
/test v4.10-integration-e2e |
Thanks! I had the exact same issue reported in another PR, and was wondering what could cause this,... until I saw this PR :) /lgtm |
2e5240e
to
3d3a8f5
Compare
/retest-required |
Eventually(func() string { | ||
stdOut = helper.Cmd("odo", "delete", "component", "--name", cmpName, "--namespace", commonVar.Project, "-f").ShouldPass().Out() | ||
return stdOut | ||
}, 60, 3).Should(ContainSubstring("No resource found for component %q in namespace %q", cmpName, commonVar.Project)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think instead of this, you can wait for Pods to not be present.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I would really want to test that the delete component
command displays that no resources found
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant, you wait for the pods to not be present, and then run the delete command to ensure it gives the right message. Why do you choose otherwise?
3d3a8f5
to
ac862b7
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
@feloy Why have IBM cloud tests not triggered yet? |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: valaparthvi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
IBM Cloud OpenShift & Kubernetes tests pass
/override ci/prow/v4.10-integration-e2e |
@feloy: Overrode contexts on behalf of feloy: ci/prow/v4.10-integration-e2e In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
* Eventually after delete component * Fix for ps -ef error
What type of PR is this:
/kind bug
What does this PR do / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
should run odo dev on initial namespace
failing on periodic jobs #5568proc/*/cmdline
as Docker seems to send SIGURG signals from time to time (Signal 23 (SIGURG) Docker event flood flatcar/Flatcar#315)PR acceptance criteria:
Unit test
Integration test
Documentation
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: