We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@anmonteiro Issue as a follow up to discussion on Reason Discord.
Similar to let%ppx syntax Reason could support module%ppx syntax. Currently, it's possible via:
let%ppx
module%ppx
%ppx module A = {}
but having module%ppx would match OCaml syntax making a lot of examples easier to read.
Example library using such syntax: https://github.com/andrenth/sequoia#the-syntax-extension
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
@anmonteiro Issue as a follow up to discussion on Reason Discord.
Similar to
let%ppxsyntax Reason could supportmodule%ppxsyntax. Currently, it's possible via:but having
module%ppxwould match OCaml syntax making a lot of examples easier to read.Example library using such syntax: https://github.com/andrenth/sequoia#the-syntax-extension
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: