Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "-b <addr>" option to elf2uf2. #1074

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

esky-software
Copy link
Contributor

The input file is treated as a binary blob to be packaged at the specified address.

Fixes #1071

The input file is treated as a binary blob to be packaged at the specified address.
@lurch
Copy link
Contributor

lurch commented Oct 18, 2022

I may have misunderstood what this is doing, but what if you want an ELF and a binary blob packaged into the same UF2 file?

@esky-software
Copy link
Contributor Author

I may have misunderstood what this is doing, but what if you want an ELF and a binary blob packaged into the same UF2 file?

This doesn't address that use case. All this does is treat the (single) input file as binary instead of ELF.

@kilograham kilograham added this to the back burner milestone May 26, 2023
@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor

note this is in back burner as we plan to release an improved tool at some point

@kilograham kilograham modified the milestones: back burner, 1.6.0 May 19, 2024
@kilograham kilograham marked this pull request as draft May 19, 2024 22:35
@kilograham
Copy link
Contributor

converting to draft as we have some upcoming changes which will affect this

@kilograham kilograham modified the milestones: 1.6.1, 1.6.2 Jul 19, 2024
@kilograham kilograham modified the milestones: 1.6.2, 2.0.0 Aug 8, 2024
@will-v-pi
Copy link
Contributor

This has been added to picotool uf2 convert (which replaces elf2uf2) as the -o option

@will-v-pi will-v-pi closed this Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants