Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forward-merge branch-25.02 into branch-25.04 #17857

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rapids-bot[bot]
Copy link

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Forward-merge triggered by push to branch-25.02 that creates a PR to keep branch-25.04 up-to-date. If this PR is unable to be immediately merged due to conflicts, it will remain open for the team to manually merge. See forward-merger docs for more info.

`shellcheck` is a fast, static analysis tool for shell scripts. It's good at
flagging up unused variables, unintentional glob expansions, and other potential
execution and security headaches that arise from the wonders of `bash` (and
other shlangs).

This PR adds a `pre-commit` hook to run `shellcheck` on all of the `sh-lang`
files in the `ci/` directory, and the changes requested by `shellcheck` to make
the existing files pass the check.

xref: rapidsai/build-planning#135

Authors:
  - Gil Forsyth (https://github.com/gforsyth)
  - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr)

Approvers:
  - Vyas Ramasubramani (https://github.com/vyasr)

URL: #17778
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot requested review from a team as code owners January 29, 2025 14:38
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot requested a review from AyodeAwe January 29, 2025 14:38
@GPUtester GPUtester merged commit 43fc535 into branch-25.04 Jan 29, 2025
1 check was pending
Copy link
Author

rapids-bot bot commented Jan 29, 2025

SUCCESS - forward-merge complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants