Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[0.8-stable] additional documentation for POROs #1503

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2016

Conversation

slothelle
Copy link

hey pals! 👋

i know, i know, it's not documentation for master 😞, but still, it's documentation! 😄

it's mostly clarification on when you need to take additional steps to use AM:S with POROs/alternative ORMs, along with a small example to show how to implement the required steps to use it. (ok, i also removed the apostrophes, you caught me)

well, you can just read it on the next tab ☺️

let me know if you'd like any changes or adjustments here and i'm happy to do so!

@@ -45,18 +45,35 @@ the serializer generator:
$ rails g serializer post
```

### Support for PORO's and other ORM's.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @feministy I'm curious if you have a reference for this grammatical change or if it's just what you're used to. I prefer the current state, myself, but I believe there's no consensus, right?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's what i'm used to - apostrophe's signal possession or a contraction, not a plural. i can swap back if it would be confusing to users!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apparently, it's a matter of some debate, but your emendation is 'more correct'. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/55970/plurals-of-acronyms-letters-numbers-use-an-apostrophe-or-not

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i love that you can be more correct about something so tiny 😂 grammar is so cooool

@bf4
Copy link
Member

bf4 commented Feb 10, 2016

@feministy Thanks! 👍 Looks great! Just one comment and would you like to add yourself to the changelog?

@slothelle
Copy link
Author

@bf4 can do! sorry i missed that - will update this evening and push back up. thanks for the quick review! 😄

@slothelle
Copy link
Author

@bf4 updated the changelog as requested under "unreleased" - let me know if that needs to be moved to a different header

bf4 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2016
[0.8-stable] additional documentation for POROs
@bf4 bf4 merged commit 1a68492 into rails-api:0-8-stable Feb 12, 2016
@bf4
Copy link
Member

bf4 commented Feb 12, 2016

Thanks... If you want a few more prs the changelog for 08 is lacking info that's in mastee iirc, also 09 - onmephone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants