Operator policies #938
Merged
Operator policies #938
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Aug 26, 2016
Conflicts: src/rabbit_control_main.erl src/rabbit_upgrade_functions.erl
Operator policies won't be used most of the time.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #930
Adds a new runtime parameter type
operator_policy, identical to policies, but supportingmessage-ttl,max-length, andmax-length-bytesdefinitions only. Plugins can add new definitions the same way they do for policies.Added CTL commands
set_operator_policy,clear_operator_policyandlist_operator_policies.operator_policyfield added to queue and exchange data structures, that's why this PR is formasterbranch.Added info keys
operator_policyandeffective_policy_definitionto display operator policy name and merged definition respectively.