Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ConsumerWorkService doesn't use the scheduler it is constructed wtih #40

Closed
michaelklishin opened this issue Mar 12, 2015 · 1 comment · Fixed by #41
Closed

ConsumerWorkService doesn't use the scheduler it is constructed wtih #40

michaelklishin opened this issue Mar 12, 2015 · 1 comment · Fixed by #41
Assignees
@michaelklishin
Labels
bug effort-low
Milestone
3.5.1

Comments

@michaelklishin
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@michaelklishin michaelklishin self-assigned this Mar 12, 2015
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 3.5.1 milestone Mar 12, 2015
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2015
@michaelklishin
Execute tasks on the provided TaskSchduler
e013433 
Fixes #40.
@michaelklishin michaelklishin mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2015
Merged
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2015
@michaelklishin
Merge pull request #41 from #40
f28770c 
Execute tasks on the provided TaskSchduler
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2015
@michaelklishin
Execute tasks on the provided TaskSchduler
c654465 
Fixes #40.
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2015
@michaelklishin
Execute consumer operation thunks in the provided task scheduler
aa14f3a 
*Submitting* consumer operations for execution takes a tiny
fraction of time but apparently some care enough about it to
request it to be performed on the provided scheduler.

This makes some logical sense. It can also lead to better
thread affinity or predictable throughput. But the primary
reason we do this is "if we don't, teh nerds will rage
again and again".

We don't want to anger the nerds, do we.

References #40, #41.
@dumbbell
Copy link
Member

dumbbell commented Apr 1, 2015

Since 3.5.0.

@michaelklishin michaelklishin mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2015
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michaelklishin michaelklishin

Labels
bug effort-low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.5.1
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Execute tasks on the provided TaskSchduler rabbitmq/rabbitmq-dotnet-client
2 participants
@michaelklishin @dumbbell