Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: provide neovim original commandline interface #1003

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

SolaWing
Copy link
Contributor

@SolaWing SolaWing commented Mar 20, 2023

see #1001, this PR expose neovim original commandline interface. so plugin can create headless subprocess in same host binary.

seealso neovim patch qvacua/neovim#3, should merge together

@georgeharker
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks - I've been running with a dupe of this for a while, and it resolves several issues (eg. neogit not working). Would be great to get these two patched in - thanks @SolaWing

@qvacua
Copy link
Owner

qvacua commented Apr 1, 2023

Thanks! I'll release a new version with this in the next days. Sorry, these days not much free time...

@ChrisGitIt ChrisGitIt mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2023
@SolaWing SolaWing changed the title feat: provide neovim original binary feat: provide neovim original commandline interface Jun 29, 2023
@mseri
Copy link

mseri commented Jul 21, 2023

Any update on this?

@qvacua
Copy link
Owner

qvacua commented Oct 31, 2023

I'm sorry for being mute for some time. I've been inactive due to some private reasons. I'll get slowly get restarted and go through all PRs.

@georgeharker
Copy link
Collaborator

The PR that removes uibridge might be a better place to start as it allows more or less stock Nvim (and external ones too when the PR to neovim goes in).

Hope all is ok.

@qvacua
Copy link
Owner

qvacua commented Oct 31, 2023

I'll merge this PR and other PRs first since @georgeharker 's PR could take some time, e.g., due to the dependency on his PR to Neovim.

@qvacua qvacua merged commit d1de50b into qvacua:master Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants