Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Using node-qunit port, the start/stop function are not exposed so we need #168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2011
Merged

Using node-qunit port, the start/stop function are not exposed so we need #168

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2011

Conversation

hashar
Copy link
Contributor

@hashar hashar commented Oct 19, 2011

Using node-qunit port, the start/stop function are not exposed so we need to prefix any call to them with 'QUnit'. Aka: start() -> QUnit.start()

@hashar
Using node-qunit port, the start/stop function are not exposed so we …
bd6a75e 
…need to prefix any call to them with 'QUnit'. Aka: start() -> QUnit.start()
@jzaefferer jzaefferer merged commit bd6a75e into qunitjs:master Oct 19, 2011
@jzaefferer
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@hashar hashar mentioned this pull request Jul 23, 2014
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@hashar @jzaefferer