-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 414
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update initialize_q_batch
methods to return both candidates and the corresponding acquisition values
#2571
Conversation
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64333367 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2571 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.98% 99.98%
=======================================
Files 195 195
Lines 17116 17122 +6
=======================================
+ Hits 17113 17119 +6
Misses 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@saitcakmak has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
… corresponding acquisition values (pytorch#2571) Summary: As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed. Differential Revision: D64333367 Pulled By: saitcakmak
fee6109
to
c292356
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64333367 |
… corresponding acquisition values (pytorch#2571) Summary: As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed. Differential Revision: D64333367 Pulled By: saitcakmak
c292356
to
f2cbf99
Compare
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64333367 |
… corresponding acquisition values (pytorch#2571) Summary: As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed. Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2571 Differential Revision: D64333367
@saitcakmak merged this pull request in b79dfb0. |
Summary: As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed.
Differential Revision: D64333367