Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update initialize_q_batch methods to return both candidates and the corresponding acquisition values #2571

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

saitcakmak
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed.

Differential Revision: D64333367

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Oct 14, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64333367

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.98%. Comparing base (85d8996) to head (f2cbf99).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2571   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.98%   99.98%           
=======================================
  Files         195      195           
  Lines       17116    17122    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits        17113    17119    +6     
  Misses          3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@saitcakmak has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

saitcakmak added a commit to saitcakmak/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
… corresponding acquisition values (pytorch#2571)

Summary:
As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed.


Differential Revision: D64333367

Pulled By: saitcakmak
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64333367

… corresponding acquisition values (pytorch#2571)

Summary:
As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed.


Differential Revision: D64333367

Pulled By: saitcakmak
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64333367

saitcakmak added a commit to saitcakmak/botorch that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
… corresponding acquisition values (pytorch#2571)

Summary:
As titled. This avoids the need to re-compute the acquisition values after sub-selecting in cases where they are needed.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2571

Differential Revision: D64333367
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@saitcakmak merged this pull request in b79dfb0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants