Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update HigherOrderGP to use new priors #2555

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

saitcakmak
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: As titled. This was leading to some test failures when I first tried it but it seems to work fine now.

Differential Revision: D63478493

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Sep 26, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63478493

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63478493

saitcakmak added a commit to saitcakmak/botorch that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2555

As titled. This was leading to some test failures when I first tried it. Turns out it was just the reference point being a bit too aggressive and filtering out all of X_baseline.

Differential Revision: D63478493
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.98%. Comparing base (e29e30a) to head (efee323).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2555   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.98%   99.98%           
=======================================
  Files         193      193           
  Lines       17062    17066    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        17059    17063    +4     
  Misses          3        3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63478493

saitcakmak added a commit to saitcakmak/botorch that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
…rch#2555)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2555

As titled. This was leading to some test failures when I first tried it. Turns out it was just the reference point being a bit too aggressive and filtering out all of X_baseline.

Differential Revision: D63478493
saitcakmak added a commit to saitcakmak/botorch that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2024
…rch#2555)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2555

As titled. This was leading to some test failures when I first tried it. Turns out it was just the reference point being a bit too aggressive and filtering out all of X_baseline.

Differential Revision: D63478493
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63478493

…rch#2555)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2555

As titled. This was leading to some test failures when I first tried it. Turns out it was just the reference point being a bit too aggressive and filtering out all of X_baseline.

Differential Revision: D63478493
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D63478493

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 98c1504.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants