PEP 458: Change title to clarify intent #1247
Conversation
Per conversation in https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-458-surviving-a-compromise-of-pypi/2648/21 about problems with current title, and and per former PEP coauthor Vladimir Diaz in https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/TXM2O34TMSHH5U6WA2IF7XKO5J3G5NQQ/#3QLN4KECII6KULKYXS7U4CVBEPGK4B6S Signed-off-by: Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]>
Change "link" which misleadingly implied transport level security. Signed-off-by: Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]>
|
@mnm678 Please feel free to supersede this with secure-systems-lab#77; should I close this PR? |
|
@brainwane I was planning to collect changes in the secure-systems-lab fork, but we can do them individually here if that would be preferable. |
|
@mnm678 While it does vary between cases, incremental updates are often a good idea, to avoid having to go over previously discussed ground with new readers. |
|
@ncoghlan Ok! I added #1268 to reflect the other changes discussed (specifically the updated abstract) and will close secure-systems-lab#77. |
|
I think this is unanimously OK'ed on the corresponding discussion thread. Could a PEP editor please take merge this/tell us what is needed to do so? |
|
@dstufft has been pinged for review; can anyone either link to a statement from him in support of this, or some other indication that we're not violating his wishes? (I quickly skimmed the thread but my Discourse-fu is not strong and I can't be sure it wasn't there.) Other than that, I can merge this in no problem. |
|
LGTM! Thanks for confirming. |
* PEP 458: Change title to clarify intent Per conversation in https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-458-surviving-a-compromise-of-pypi/2648/21 about problems with current title, and and per former PEP coauthor Vladimir Diaz in https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/TXM2O34TMSHH5U6WA2IF7XKO5J3G5NQQ/#3QLN4KECII6KULKYXS7U4CVBEPGK4B6S Signed-off-by: Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]> * PEP 458: Improve title Change "link" which misleadingly implied transport level security. Signed-off-by: Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]>
Per conversation in
https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-458-surviving-a-compromise-of-pypi/2648/21
about problems with current title, and and per former PEP coauthor
Vladimir Diaz in
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/TXM2O34TMSHH5U6WA2IF7XKO5J3G5NQQ/#3QLN4KECII6KULKYXS7U4CVBEPGK4B6S
Signed-off-by: Sumana Harihareswara [email protected]