-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bpo-29548: Fix some inefficient call API usage #97
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -560,37 +560,25 @@ functools_reduce(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | |
return NULL; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if ((args = PyTuple_New(2)) == NULL) | ||
goto Fail; | ||
|
||
for (;;) { | ||
PyObject *op2; | ||
|
||
if (args->ob_refcnt > 1) { | ||
Py_DECREF(args); | ||
if ((args = PyTuple_New(2)) == NULL) | ||
goto Fail; | ||
} | ||
|
||
op2 = PyIter_Next(it); | ||
PyObject *op2 = PyIter_Next(it); | ||
if (op2 == NULL) { | ||
if (PyErr_Occurred()) | ||
goto Fail; | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (result == NULL) | ||
if (result == NULL) { | ||
result = op2; | ||
} | ||
else { | ||
PyTuple_SetItem(args, 0, result); | ||
PyTuple_SetItem(args, 1, op2); | ||
if ((result = PyEval_CallObject(func, args)) == NULL) | ||
PyObject *args[] = {result, op2}; | ||
if ((result = _PyObject_FastCall(func, args, 2)) == NULL) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would you mind to move the assignment out of the if() please? "result = ...; if (result == NULL) ...". |
||
goto Fail; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
Py_DECREF(args); | ||
|
||
if (result == NULL) | ||
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, | ||
"reduce() of empty sequence with no initial value"); | ||
|
@@ -599,7 +587,6 @@ functools_reduce(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | |
return result; | ||
|
||
Fail: | ||
Py_XDECREF(args); | ||
Py_XDECREF(result); | ||
Py_DECREF(it); | ||
return NULL; | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2417,7 +2417,7 @@ PythonCmd(ClientData clientData, Tcl_Interp *interp, int argc, const char *argv[ | |
} | ||
PyTuple_SET_ITEM(arg, i, s); | ||
} | ||
res = PyEval_CallObject(func, arg); | ||
res = PyObject_Call(func, arg, NULL); | ||
Py_DECREF(arg); | ||
|
||
if (res == NULL) | ||
|
@@ -2667,10 +2667,7 @@ FileHandler(ClientData clientData, int mask) | |
func = data->func; | ||
file = data->file; | ||
|
||
arg = Py_BuildValue("(Oi)", file, (long) mask); | ||
res = PyEval_CallObject(func, arg); | ||
Py_DECREF(arg); | ||
|
||
res = PyObject_CallFunction(func, "Oi", file, (long) mask); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. arg variable is no more used and can be removed, no? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thank you. I missed it. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I spotted it as well, but then I forgot to report it, sorry :-) Hopefully you fixed it! |
||
if (res == NULL) { | ||
errorInCmd = 1; | ||
PyErr_Fetch(&excInCmd, &valInCmd, &trbInCmd); | ||
|
@@ -2840,7 +2837,7 @@ TimerHandler(ClientData clientData) | |
|
||
ENTER_PYTHON | ||
|
||
res = PyEval_CallObject(func, NULL); | ||
res = _PyObject_CallNoArg(func); | ||
Py_DECREF(func); | ||
Py_DECREF(v); /* See Tktt_New() */ | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I expect a ltitle slowdown if the function doesn't support fastcall. For example, a Python object with a call() method.
Can you please try to run a quick benchmark on the following two cases:
In general, I'm in favor of removing such hack, since playing with reference count can lead to complex and annoying bugs. But I would prefer to first see the cost on performances.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.