-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-112075: Accessing a single element should optimistically avoid locking #115109
Conversation
1266799
to
2f46a39
Compare
ef7c6ea
to
54095de
Compare
Objects/dictobject.c
Outdated
set_keys(mp, new_keys_object(interp, log2_newsize, unicode)); | ||
if (mp->ma_keys == NULL) { | ||
mp->ma_keys = oldkeys; | ||
set_keys(mp, oldkeys); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the possible temporary assignment to NULL is thread-safe without the GIL. Let's assign the result of new_keys_object()
to a temporary variable and check that before assigning it to mp->ma_keys
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I was looking at this function when you made a comment about it on #114741 I realized that the assignment of it to a new empty table isn't right at all! We really need to allocate the new table, copy everything over, and then we can publish it.
Objects/dictobject.c
Outdated
@@ -3591,11 +3942,18 @@ dict___contains___impl(PyDictObject *self, PyObject *key) | |||
if (hash == -1) | |||
return NULL; | |||
} | |||
#ifdef Py_GIL_DISABLED |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this differ from PyDict_Contains()
? Can we just call that?
@@ -4157,10 +4534,20 @@ _PyDict_Contains_KnownHash(PyObject *op, PyObject *key, Py_hash_t hash) | |||
PyObject *value; | |||
Py_ssize_t ix; | |||
|
|||
#ifdef Py_GIL_DISABLED |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This also looks like contains_known_hash
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or does contains_known_hash
look like this? 🤔
54095de
to
af7ddb9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
af7ddb9
to
d608fb3
Compare
…id locking (python#115109) Makes accessing a single element thread safe and typically lock free
…id locking (python#115109) Makes accessing a single element thread safe and typically lock free
…id locking (python#115109) Makes accessing a single element thread safe and typically lock free
Makes accessing a single element thread safe.
Adds tracking for whether a dictionary is shared or not, but some of this gets duplicated in #115108.
Does not yet deal with all of the atomic assignments that need to happen to make this 100% right, that'll come in a separate PR.
dict
objects thread-safe in--disable-gil
builds #112075