Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gh-112075: Iterating a dict shouldn't require locks #115108

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 22, 2024
Merged

gh-112075: Iterating a dict shouldn't require locks #115108

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
afddb70
Thread safe lock-free iteration
DinoV Feb 1, 2024
39bc495
Don't use atomics for iteratio and allow multiple threads to race on …
DinoV Feb 16, 2024
902ce67
Fixup ifdef/ifndef
DinoV Feb 16, 2024
0ba2f5d
Use has_unique_reference
DinoV Feb 16, 2024
042cf26
Less atomics
DinoV Feb 21, 2024
a079a6d
Fix style issues
DinoV Feb 21, 2024
a1d7718
acquire_key_value returns -1 and 0
DinoV Feb 22, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions Include/internal/pycore_dict.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static inline PyDictUnicodeEntry* DK_UNICODE_ENTRIES(PyDictKeysObject *dk) {
#define DICT_WATCHER_AND_MODIFICATION_MASK ((1 << (DICT_MAX_WATCHERS + DICT_WATCHED_MUTATION_BITS)) - 1)

#define DICT_VALUES_SIZE(values) ((uint8_t *)values)[-1]
#define DICT_VALUES_USED_SIZE(values) ((uint8_t *)values)[-2]

#ifdef Py_GIL_DISABLED
#define DICT_NEXT_VERSION(INTERP) \
Expand Down
Loading
Loading