Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/3.3.x] Fix a false positive for invalid-getnewargs-ex-returned #10210

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 8138620 from #10209.

…tuple or dict has been assigned to a name. (#10209)

(cherry picked from commit 8138620)
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 3.3.5 milestone Jan 30, 2025
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.84%. Comparing base (c2b01c3) to head (2f6fffc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on maintenance/3.3.x.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/3.3.x   #10210   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              95.84%   95.84%           
==================================================
  Files                    174      174           
  Lines                  18980    18980           
==================================================
  Hits                   18191    18191           
  Misses                   789      789           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/classes/special_methods_checker.py 95.45% <100.00%> (ø)

@mbyrnepr2 mbyrnepr2 merged commit bbd73ce into maintenance/3.3.x Jan 30, 2025
25 checks passed
@mbyrnepr2 mbyrnepr2 deleted the backport-10209-to-maintenance/3.3.x branch January 30, 2025 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants