[hotfix] handle packages that lack a description on GitHub

[banesullivan]

Hotfix for pyOpenSci/pyopensci.github.io#560

The issue is that astrodata does not have a description on GitHub so the API returns null and our GhMeta Pydantic model requires this field be set to some string. Considering that repositories on GitHub don't have to have a description, I have changed the description field to be optional.

I also added a few other print statements to our routines to make it a little ore obvious what is going on. A few people had looked at the CI logs and thought Earthpy must be the issue since it was the last logged package. However that was from the previous processing step and the gh-metrics step was running across all packages without any indication.

This PR is meant as a hotfix to get CI back up and running but there are a few things I want to do to improve this which I will post in pyOpenSci/pyopensci.github.io#560

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.27%. Comparing base (55876aa) to head (26c5ad2).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/pyosmeta/parse_issues.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #257      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.38%   76.27%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines         724      725       +1     
  Branches       92       92              
==========================================
  Hits          553      553              
- Misses        161      162       +1     
  Partials       10       10              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[willingc]

This looks good to me. Let's get this up and running.

Someday in the future we may wish to migrate the print statements to logging but not important today.

[pllim]

Thanks! Is there something else that needs to be done for the 4th package to show up at https://www.pyopensci.org/communities/astropy.html ? 🙏 🙇‍♀️

[banesullivan]

I think we just need to issue a release for pyosmeta so that this new version is picked up by this workflow and then the site will be updated

[banesullivan]

And that release to pypi is waiting on @lwasser's approval in https://github.com/pyOpenSci/pyosMeta/actions/runs/13348330244