Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add carp protocol to :proto property #1014

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2021
Merged

Add carp protocol to :proto property #1014

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2021

Conversation

adrianiurca
Copy link
Contributor

On Gentoo using 'vrrp' sets the proto to 112 but when puppet runs it interprets 112 as 'carp' which it then corrects to 'vrrp' which is still 112. So it redoes the rule every time puppet runs. Adding carp here allows carp to be set as a valid option which removes the loop.

On Gentoo using 'vrrp' sets the proto to 112 but when puppet runs it interprets 112 as 'carp' which it then corrects to 'vrrp' which is still 112. So it redoes the rule every time puppet runs. Adding carp here allows carp to be set as a valid option which removes the loop.
@adrianiurca adrianiurca requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2021 12:52
@puppet-community-rangefinder
Copy link

firewall is a type

Breaking changes to this file WILL impact these 121 modules (exact match):
Breaking changes to this file MAY impact these 143 modules (near match):

This module is declared in 108 of 578 indexed public Puppetfiles.


These results were generated with Rangefinder, a tool that helps predict the downstream impact of breaking changes to elements used in Puppet modules. You can run this on the command line to get a full report.

Exact matches are those that we can positively identify via namespace and the declaring modules' metadata. Non-namespaced items, such as Puppet 3.x functions, will always be reported as near matches only.

Copy link
Contributor

@sanfrancrisko sanfrancrisko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth updating this test too, as part of the change.

Copy link
Contributor

@carabasdaniel carabasdaniel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

@carabasdaniel carabasdaniel merged commit 760196f into main Sep 10, 2021
@carabasdaniel carabasdaniel deleted the pull-back-pr-945 branch September 10, 2021 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants