-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(Modules-4508) Fixed error with version parameter #69
(Modules-4508) Fixed error with version parameter #69
Conversation
Using one dash instead of two for a parameter causes chocolatey to think the parameter is a bundled option (like -dvyf means --debug --verbose --confirm --force).
@Koshersalt there are a few more places this will need to be fixed. Also, I started a branch to see if Chocolatey was 0.9.9+ and automatically use |
Started being the keyword there... |
Yeaaaah, I realized after the tests came back that it wasn't quite the quick fix I'd hoped lol. |
@Koshersalt hold tight. I have to still find that branch ;) |
@ferventcoder To summarise then...behaviour of |
Updated PR with modified spec tests, so now all specs pass. Will try to sync up with @ferventcoder to see if I can help identify the other areas he speaks of to change |
Seems related to chocolatey-archive#149 |
@ferventcoder Looks like chocolatey/choco@51d59c8 has regressed |
Confirmed that this was not an issue using Choco 0.9.9.12 but then started failing 0.9.10. This fix uses |
Running through Adhoc CI to make sure it's all ok |
Adhoc is green. Merging |
It's the diff btw 0.9.8.x and below and 0.9.9+ |
Which the supported module probably will no longer support. It may be a good idea to double dash all long names. |
Using one dash instead of two for a parameter causes chocolatey to think
the parameter is a bundled option (like -dvyf means --debug --verbose
--confirm --force).