Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(maint) enable coveralls #201

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2017
Merged

(maint) enable coveralls #201

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 27, 2017

Conversation

DavidS
Copy link
Contributor

@DavidS DavidS commented Jul 27, 2017

No description provided.

@DavidS DavidS force-pushed the enable-coveralls branch 3 times, most recently from 2e6e349 to 15131e4 Compare July 27, 2017 17:22
@puppetlabs puppetlabs deleted a comment from coveralls Jul 27, 2017
@puppetlabs puppetlabs deleted a comment from coveralls Jul 27, 2017
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 15131e4 on DavidS:enable-coveralls into ** on puppetlabs:master**.

@DavidS DavidS force-pushed the enable-coveralls branch from 15131e4 to 388015f Compare July 27, 2017 17:31
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 388015f on DavidS:enable-coveralls into ** on puppetlabs:master**.

.travis.yml Outdated
- "cat Gemfile.lock"
- "bundle exec rake $CHECK"
- cat Gemfile.lock
- bundle exec rake $CHECK
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused by the elimination of this indentation, still seems to be valid YAML either way but was there something that prompted this (and the similar change to the matrix/include section below)?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 3433e0a on DavidS:enable-coveralls into ** on puppetlabs:master**.

@scotje scotje merged commit c0fa634 into puppetlabs:master Jul 27, 2017
@DavidS DavidS deleted the enable-coveralls branch July 31, 2017 10:20
@chelnak chelnak added the maintenance Internal maintenance work that shouldn't appear in the changelog label Jan 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Internal maintenance work that shouldn't appear in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants