Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New example: pulumi-ts #843

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

New example: pulumi-ts #843

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

EronWright
Copy link
Contributor

Contributes a new example showing how to use Pulumi IAC to manage Stacks.

A unique aspect of this example is that it automatically provisions a Pulumi Cloud access token for the stack to use. Note this important limitation of @pulumi/pulumiservice:

While you can use this provider to provision access tokens, you’ll still need to have an access token available to generate an access token with the provider.

@EronWright EronWright requested a review from a team February 19, 2025 22:11
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.17%. Comparing base (3c0b263) to head (730c769).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #843   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.17%   52.17%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines        4556     4556           
=======================================
  Hits         2377     2377           
  Misses       1986     1986           
  Partials      193      193           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
CHANGELOG
=========

## Unreleased

- New example: pulumi-ts [#843](https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-kubernetes-operator/pull/843)
Copy link
Member

@rquitales rquitales Feb 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need a changelog for this. It isn't adding anything to our release bundle, nor does it affect any features. Let's remove and use the no-changelog-required tag.

},
}, {dependsOn: [sa, crb, apiSecret]});

// export const stackName = stack.metadata.name;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: should we uncomment this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants