Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TestRegress2534 failing in CI #5106

Open
flostadler opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

TestRegress2534 failing in CI #5106

flostadler opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
@flostadler
Labels
kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user

Comments

@flostadler
Copy link
Contributor

TestRegress2534 started failing in CI, but still passes locally (see #5100). There might be some side effects that affect this.
@flostadler flostadler added the kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user label Jan 14, 2025
@flostadler flostadler self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
@flostadler flostadler mentioned this issue Jan 14, 2025
Merged
flostadler added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2025
@flostadler
Skip TestRegress2534 (#5107)
c62bffb 
`TestRegress2534` started failing in CI, but still passes locally (see
#5100). There might be some
side effects in CI that affect this.

Skipping the test for now to unblock the pipeline while I investigate
the issue (see #5106).

Relates to #5106
Fixes #5100
@flostadler
Copy link
Contributor Author

flostadler commented Jan 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I have a hunch that this has to do with an unreleased feature in pu/pu: pulumi/pulumi@3cf47c8
That would also explain why it's not happening locally for me.

pu/pu is now loading the package reference (see). This internally compares the requested version (from the SDK I think?) with the actual version from the provider:
https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/blame/5c436e08e8606128f231505dfe8241b3ec6268f0/pkg/codegen/schema/loader.go#L236

Those do not match in our case because we're running with an attached provider (=> 6.66.3 vs 6.67.0-alpha.1736814523+bf974ad)

@flostadler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, I was able to repro by using the latest dev version (pulumi-v3.146.0-alpha.x5090db0) of pu/pu locally

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@flostadler flostadler

Labels
kind/engineering Work that is not visible to an external user
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@flostadler