Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement get_next_epoch_committee_assignment helper function #1552

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Feb 12, 2019

Conversation

terencechain
Copy link
Member

@terencechain terencechain commented Feb 11, 2019

This is part of #1541

In this PR we implement get_next_epoch_committee_assignment helper function which will be used by validators to find out which slot, shard they get assigned to during look up.

  • Implement get_next_epoch_committee_assignment
  • Write unit tests for get_next_epoch_committee_assignment

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1552 into master will increase coverage by 0.19%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1552      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.41%   71.61%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines        6528     6549      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits         4662     4690      +28     
+ Misses       1458     1449       -9     
- Partials      408      410       +2

@terencechain terencechain requested review from rauljordan, nisdas and prestonvanloon and removed request for rauljordan and nisdas February 11, 2019 16:57
@terencechain terencechain self-assigned this Feb 11, 2019
@terencechain terencechain merged commit 471b2ed into master Feb 12, 2019
@nisdas nisdas deleted the get_next_epoch_committee_assignments branch April 20, 2019 03:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants