Oblackmon3/rebase polymer develop to match v0.0.25 #3
Conversation
… is properly implemented
…vements, various bugs
) * fix: checking param for blockHash or blockNumber obj * fix: conditional logic for eth_call caching * fix: conditional logic for eth__getProof and eth_getStorageAt caching * fix: rm redundant len check for blockHash param * fix: set error as nil for conditional checking of params * fix: handle blockHash if param is string * test: eth_call and eth_getProof blockHash/blockNumber object as param * fix: NormalizeEvmHttpJsonRpc for eth_getStorageAt method to support blockNumber as obj
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple changes across various files, primarily enhancing the functionality of GitHub Actions workflows, updating Docker and Go configurations, and refining error handling mechanisms. A new workflow for pruning container images is added, while existing workflows for releases and tests are modified to improve their execution based on conditions. Additionally, several utility functions are introduced or updated to enhance memory handling and JSON processing. Documentation updates provide clearer guidance on configuration options and operational details. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub Actions
participant Docker
participant Go Application
User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger Workflow
GitHub Actions->>Docker: Build Image
Docker->>Go Application: Deploy Application
Go Application->>User: Respond to Request
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (94)
.vscode/launch.json (1)
14-18: 💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Incorrect Compiler Paths and Missing Go Installation
- The specified C compiler (
/usr/bin/cc) and C++ compiler (/usr/bin/c++) are not found in the current environment.- Go is not installed or not available in the PATH, causing
CGO_ENABLEDto be ineffective.Recommendations:
Update Compiler Paths:
- Verify the actual locations of the C and C++ compilers on your development machines.
- Update the
CCandCXXenvironment variables in.vscode/launch.jsonwith the correct paths.- Alternatively, consider removing the hardcoded paths and rely on the system's PATH to locate the compilers.
Install and Configure Go:
- Ensure that Go is installed on all development environments where this configuration will be used.
- Add Go to the system PATH to enable
CGO_ENABLEDto function correctly.Make Configuration Flexible:
- Instead of hardcoding paths, use environment variables or relative paths to enhance portability across different systems.
Documentation:
- Document the setup requirements for development environments, including the necessary installations and configurations for C, C++, and Go.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM. Consider documenting and verifying these environment variables.
The addition of these environment variables looks good and may be necessary for building with C/C++ dependencies. However, I have a few suggestions:
- Consider adding a comment explaining why these environment variables are needed. This will help future developers understand the configuration.
- Verify that the compiler paths ("/usr/bin/cc" and "/usr/bin/c++") are correct across all development environments used by the team. These paths might need to be adjusted for different operating systems or setups.
- Be aware that enabling CGo (CGO_ENABLED=1) can impact build times and binary portability. Ensure this is necessary for your project's requirements.
To verify the compiler paths across different environments, you could add a step in your CI pipeline or create a simple script for developers to run. Here's a basic shell script to check:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify C and C++ compiler paths echo "Checking C compiler..." if [ -x "/usr/bin/cc" ]; then echo "C compiler found at /usr/bin/cc" else echo "Warning: C compiler not found at /usr/bin/cc" fi echo "Checking C++ compiler..." if [ -x "/usr/bin/c++" ]; then echo "C++ compiler found at /usr/bin/c++" else echo "Warning: C++ compiler not found at /usr/bin/c++" fi echo "Checking CGo..." if [ "$(go env CGO_ENABLED)" == "1" ]; then echo "CGo is enabled" else echo "Warning: CGo is not enabled" fiLength of output: 585
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate C and C++ compiler paths and verify Go installation echo "Locating C compiler..." CC_PATH=$(command -v cc) if [ -n "$CC_PATH" ]; then echo "C compiler found at $CC_PATH" else echo "Warning: C compiler not found in PATH" fi echo "Locating C++ compiler..." CXX_PATH=$(command -v c++) if [ -n "$CXX_PATH" ]; then echo "C++ compiler found at $CXX_PATH" else echo "Warning: C++ compiler not found in PATH" fi echo "Verifying Go installation..." GO_PATH=$(command -v go) if [ -n "$GO_PATH" ]; then echo "Go is installed at $GO_PATH" CGO_ENABLED_STATUS=$(go env CGO_ENABLED) echo "CGo Enabled: $CGO_ENABLED_STATUS" else echo "Warning: Go is not installed or not found in PATH" echo "CGo cannot be enabled without Go installation" fiLength of output: 698
data/connector.go (1)
18-19: 💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete Implementations for SetTTL and HasTTL Methods
The
SetTTLandHasTTLmethods are declared in multiple connector implementations but lack meaningful logic. Please ensure that these methods are properly implemented to support TTL functionality as intended.🔗 Analysis chain
Approve the addition of TTL methods to the Connector interface.
The new
SetTTLandHasTTLmethods are good additions to theConnectorinterface, allowing for TTL functionality across different connector types. This enhancement can be useful for caching or data expiration scenarios.To ensure consistency across all connector implementations, please run the following script:
Consider adding documentation for these new methods to clarify their purpose and expected behavior. For example:
// SetTTL sets the Time-To-Live (TTL) for a specific method. // The ttlStr parameter should be a valid duration string (e.g., "5m", "1h"). SetTTL(method string, ttlStr string) error // HasTTL checks if a TTL is set for a specific method. HasTTL(method string) bool🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of SetTTL and HasTTL methods in all connector types. # Test: Search for SetTTL and HasTTL implementations in all connector files. echo "Checking SetTTL implementations:" rg -p "func \(\w+\s+\*\w+Connector\)\s+SetTTL\(" data/ echo "Checking HasTTL implementations:" rg -p "func \(\w+\s+\*\w+Connector\)\s+HasTTL\(" data/Length of output: 1072
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementations of SetTTL and HasTTL methods in all connector types. echo "Retrieving SetTTL implementations:" ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ *Connector) SetTTL($_, $_) error { $$$ }' data/ echo "Retrieving HasTTL implementations:" ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ *Connector) HasTTL($_) bool { $$$ }' data/Length of output: 310
erpc/erpc.go (1)
60-62: 💡 Codebase verification
Add unit tests for
GetAll()inProjectsRegistry.The
GetAll()method is implemented correctly inProjectsRegistry, but no tests were found for it. It's essential to add unit tests to ensure its functionality and performance, especially when dealing with a large number of projects.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the implementation of
GetAll()inProjectsRegistry.While the
GetProjectsmethod is correctly implemented, it's crucial to ensure that theGetAll()method inProjectsRegistryis properly implemented and tested, especially considering potential performance implications for a large number of projects.Let's verify the implementation of
GetAll():
Further verification needed for
GetAll()inProjectsRegistry.[/run_scripts]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of GetAll() in ProjectsRegistry # Test: Check the implementation of GetAll() in ProjectsRegistry ast-grep --pattern $'type ProjectsRegistry struct { $$$ } func (r *ProjectsRegistry) GetAll() []*PreparedProject { $$$ }' # Test: Check for any existing tests for GetAll() rg -A 5 'func TestProjectsRegistry_GetAll'Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all methods in ProjectsRegistry # List all methods of ProjectsRegistry ast-grep --pattern $'type ProjectsRegistry struct { $$$ } func (r *ProjectsRegistry) $$$($_) $$$ { $$$ }'Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for methods returning []*PreparedProject in ProjectsRegistry rg -A 5 'func \(r \*ProjectsRegistry\) [A-Za-z0-9_]+\([^)]*\) \[]\*PreparedProject'Length of output: 469
Dockerfile (1)
32-35:
⚠️ Potential issueApprove path change, but reconsider permissions.
Moving the binaries to
/usr/bin/is a good practice. However, setting permissions to 777 is overly permissive and could pose security risks.Consider using more restrictive permissions. For most cases, 755 (rwxr-xr-x) should be sufficient:
RUN chmod 755 /usr/bin/erpc-server*This allows the owner to read, write, and execute, while others can only read and execute, which is typically sufficient for binary executables.
common/sonic.go (1)
1-58: 💡 Codebase verification
Potential issues identified with SonicCfg configuration.
The SonicCfg configuration impacts multiple parts of the system. Please review the following areas to ensure compatibility:
upstream/upstream.goupstream/http_json_rpc_client.goerpc/networks_test.goerpc/http_server.gocommon/request.gocommon/json_rpc.gocommon/errors.gocommon/response.gocommon/config.gocommon/sonic.goAdditionally:
- Custom JSON marshaling/unmarshaling implementations may be affected.
- Usage of the standard
encoding/jsonpackage in several files might require updates to align with SonicCfg configuration.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of Sonic JSON configuration on the system.
The Sonic JSON configuration in this file is optimized for performance, which is generally good. However, it's important to ensure that these optimizations don't introduce unexpected behavior in other parts of the system.
Please run the following script to check for any potential issues:
This script will help identify:
- Where
SonicCfgis being used.- Any custom JSON marshaling/unmarshaling that might be affected by the new configuration.
- Any uses of the standard
encoding/jsonpackage that might need to be updated to use Sonic instead.Please review the results to ensure that the new configuration is compatible with existing code and that all necessary updates have been made.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of SonicCfg and potential impacts # Test 1: Check for uses of SonicCfg echo "Checking uses of SonicCfg:" rg "SonicCfg" --type go # Test 2: Look for any custom JSON marshaling/unmarshaling that might be affected echo "\nChecking for custom JSON marshaling/unmarshaling:" rg "(MarshalJSON|UnmarshalJSON)" --type go # Test 3: Check for any uses of the standard encoding/json package that might need to be updated echo "\nChecking for uses of encoding/json:" rg "encoding/json" --type goLength of output: 4183
test/cmd/main.go (1)
23-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider scalability and diversity in additional server configurations
The addition of 102 new server configurations (ports 9084-9185) significantly increases the scale of the test environment. While this can provide more comprehensive testing, please consider:
- The impact on system resources when running tests with this many servers.
- Whether using fixed values for
FailureRate(0.05) andLimitedRate(0.01) for all additional servers provides sufficient diversity in testing scenarios.- The necessity of having such a large number of test servers and whether a smaller subset could achieve the same testing goals.
Consider parameterizing the number of additional servers and their configuration values. This would allow for more flexible testing setups. For example:
func generateAdditionalConfigs(startPort, endPort int, failureRate, limitedRate float64) []test.ServerConfig { var configs []test.ServerConfig for i := startPort; i <= endPort; i++ { configs = append(configs, test.ServerConfig{ Port: i, FailureRate: failureRate, LimitedRate: limitedRate, MinDelay: 30 * time.Millisecond, MaxDelay: 150 * time.Millisecond, SampleFile: "test/samples/evm-json-rpc.json", }) } return configs } // Usage additionalConfigs := generateAdditionalConfigs(9084, 9185, 0.05, 0.01) serverConfigs = append(serverConfigs, additionalConfigs...)This approach would make it easier to adjust the number and properties of additional servers for different testing scenarios.
upstream/ratelimiter_registry.go (1)
73-73: 💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent
MaxCountType DeclarationsThe
common/config.gofile contains conflicting declarations ofMaxCountas bothintanduint. Please update all instances touintto maintain type consistency and ensure type safety across the codebase.🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.
The removal of the explicit
uintconversion improves type safety and aligns with the reported change incommon/config.gowhereMaxCountis now of typeuint. This change enhances clarity and reduces the potential for type-related errors.To ensure consistency, let's verify that all usages of
MaxCountin the codebase have been updated accordingly:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uint conversions of MaxCount and its usage # Expected result: No instances of uint(MaxCount) and consistent uint typing for MaxCount # Search for any remaining uint conversions of MaxCount echo "Searching for remaining uint conversions of MaxCount:" rg 'uint\(\s*MaxCount\s*\)' -g '!vendor/' # Search for MaxCount declarations and usages echo "Searching for MaxCount declarations and usages:" rg 'MaxCount\s*[^)]' -g '!vendor/'Length of output: 2090
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
99-115:
⚠️ Potential issueLGTM with suggestion: New steps for short SHA and main branch Docker build
These additions enhance the workflow's flexibility and provide better tagging for Docker images:
- The short SHA generation is useful for creating more manageable image tags.
- The conditional step to build and push a Docker image from the main branch allows for continuous updates of the 'main' tagged image, which is great for development and testing purposes.
There's a potential issue in the short SHA generation step. To prevent possible word splitting and globbing, it's recommended to use double quotes. Please update line 101 as follows:
- run: echo "SHORT_SHA=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT + run: echo "SHORT_SHA=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"This change ensures that the output is correctly captured, even if it contains spaces or special characters.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.- name: Generate short SHA id: short_sha run: echo "SHORT_SHA=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT" - name: Build and push Docker image from main if: github.event.inputs.version_tag == '' uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . push: true platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64 build-args: | VERSION=main COMMIT_SHA=${{ steps.short_sha.outputs.SHORT_SHA }} tags: | ghcr.io/${{ steps.tag_param.outputs.repo }}:main🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
101-101: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
data/postgresql.go (1)
92-95: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve the SetTTL method implementation
While the placeholder implementation maintains consistency with other connectors, consider the following improvements:
- Use more specific parameter names (e.g.,
keyandttl) instead of underscores to improve readability.- Enhance the debug message to include the attempted key and TTL values.
- Consider returning an error indicating that the feature is not implemented, rather than silently succeeding.
Here's a suggested implementation:
func (p *PostgreSQLConnector) SetTTL(key string, ttl string) error { p.logger.Debug().Msgf("SetTTL not implemented for PostgreSQLConnector. Attempted values - Key: %s, TTL: %s", key, ttl) return fmt.Errorf("SetTTL not implemented for PostgreSQLConnector") }This change would provide more informative logging and a clear indication to callers that the method is not supported.
data/dynamodb.go (1)
264-267: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the
SetTTLmethod implementationWhile the method serves as a placeholder for future TTL implementation, consider the following improvements:
- Make the debug message more specific, e.g., "SetTTL method not implemented for DynamoDBConnector".
- Consider returning an error instead of nil to indicate that the operation is not supported. This would prevent silent failures if the method is called without checking
HasTTLfirst.Here's a suggested implementation:
func (d *DynamoDBConnector) SetTTL(_ string, _ string) error { - d.logger.Debug().Msgf("Method TTLs not implemented for DynamoDBConnector") - return nil + d.logger.Debug().Msg("SetTTL method not implemented for DynamoDBConnector") + return fmt.Errorf("SetTTL is not supported for DynamoDBConnector") }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (d *DynamoDBConnector) SetTTL(_ string, _ string) error { d.logger.Debug().Msg("SetTTL method not implemented for DynamoDBConnector") return fmt.Errorf("SetTTL is not supported for DynamoDBConnector") }test/samples/evm-json-rpc.json (1)
1439-1451:
⚠️ Potential issue
debug_traceTransactionimplementation needs improvement.The addition of the
debug_traceTransactionmethod is a good step towards enhanced debugging capabilities. However, the current implementation has some issues:
- The response contains a placeholder result "bigfake:50000000" instead of an actual transaction trace.
- This placeholder doesn't match the expected format for a
debug_traceTransactionresult, which should be a detailed trace of the transaction execution.To improve this, consider the following:
- Implement actual transaction tracing logic to return a detailed execution trace.
- Ensure the response follows the standard format for
debug_traceTransaction, which typically includes steps of execution, gas usage, memory operations, and stack changes.- If this is intended as a mock or placeholder, use a more realistic mock data structure that mirrors the expected output format.
Example of a more realistic mock response:
{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "gas": 21000, "failed": false, "returnValue": "", "structLogs": [ { "pc": 0, "op": "PUSH1", "gas": 21000, "gasCost": 3, "depth": 1, "stack": [], "memory": [], "storage": {} }, // ... more steps ... ] } }This structure more closely resembles what would be expected from an actual
debug_traceTransactioncall.util/fastmem.go (4)
21-25:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid unsafe conversion in
Mem2StrfunctionThe
Mem2Strfunction uses unsafe pointer manipulation to convert a[]byteto astring. This approach can lead to unexpected behavior, violates the immutability of strings in Go, and may introduce subtle bugs if the underlying byte slice is modified elsewhere.Consider using safe conversion methods:
-func Mem2Str(v []byte) (s string) { - (*GoString)(unsafe.Pointer(&s)).Len = (*GoSlice)(unsafe.Pointer(&v)).Len // #nosec G103 - (*GoString)(unsafe.Pointer(&s)).Ptr = (*GoSlice)(unsafe.Pointer(&v)).Ptr // #nosec G103 - return +func Mem2Str(v []byte) string { + return string(v) }If performance is a critical concern and you're using Go 1.20 or later, you can use
unsafe.String:import "unsafe" // ... func Mem2Str(v []byte) string { return unsafe.String(&v[0], len(v)) }Note: Ensure that
vis not empty to avoid a panic when accessingv[0].
28-33:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid unsafe conversion in
Str2MemfunctionThe
Str2Memfunction uses unsafe pointer manipulation to convert astringto a[]byte. This is risky because strings in Go are immutable, and sharing the underlying data can lead to undefined behavior if the byte slice is modified.For safe conversion, use:
-func Str2Mem(s string) (v []byte) { - (*GoSlice)(unsafe.Pointer(&v)).Cap = (*GoString)(unsafe.Pointer(&s)).Len // #nosec G103 - (*GoSlice)(unsafe.Pointer(&v)).Len = (*GoString)(unsafe.Pointer(&s)).Len // #nosec G103 - (*GoSlice)(unsafe.Pointer(&v)).Ptr = (*GoString)(unsafe.Pointer(&s)).Ptr // #nosec G103 - return +func Str2Mem(s string) []byte { + return []byte(s) }If you need to avoid copying for performance reasons and are certain that the byte slice will not be modified, you can use
unsafe.Slicein Go 1.20 or later:import ( "unsafe" ) // ... func Str2Mem(s string) []byte { strHeader := (*[2]uintptr)(unsafe.Pointer(&s)) data := strHeader[0] length := strHeader[1] return unsafe.Slice((*byte)(unsafe.Pointer(data)), length) }However, exercise caution as this breaks the immutability contract of strings and can lead to undefined behavior if the byte slice is modified.
20-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review necessity of
//go:nosplitdirectivesThe
//go:nosplitdirectives prevent the Go scheduler from preempting the function, which can lead to stack overflows if the function needs to grow the stack. Unless there's a specific reason (e.g., the function is called in a context where stack splitting is unsafe), consider removing these directives to allow normal stack management.Also applies to: 27-27
35-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify
StringToReaderCloserwith safe conversionThe
StringToReaderCloserfunction relies onStr2Memfor converting strings to byte slices. Given the issues withStr2Mem, it's advisable to handle string-to-byte conversion safely.Simplify the function using
bytes.NewBufferString, which creates a buffer directly from a string:-func StringToReaderCloser(b string) io.ReadCloser { - return io.NopCloser(bytes.NewBuffer(Str2Mem(b))) +func StringToReaderCloser(b string) io.ReadCloser { + return io.NopCloser(bytes.NewBufferString(b)) }This approach eliminates the need for unsafe conversions and ensures data integrity.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func StringToReaderCloser(b string) io.ReadCloser { return io.NopCloser(bytes.NewBufferString(b)) }test/k6/run.js (2)
8-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review
preAllocatedVUsandmaxVUssettings for optimal resource usageThe current configuration sets both
preAllocatedVUsandmaxVUsto 1000 for a request rate of 500 requests per second. This may allocate more virtual users than necessary, leading to unnecessary resource consumption. Consider adjusting these values to better match the expected load.You might reduce
preAllocatedVUsandmaxVUsto align with the rate:executor: 'constant-arrival-rate', rate: 500, timeUnit: '1s', duration: '30m', - preAllocatedVUs: 1000, - maxVUs: 1000, + preAllocatedVUs: 500, + maxVUs: 500,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.scenarios: { constant_request_rate: { executor: 'constant-arrival-rate', rate: 500, timeUnit: '1s', duration: '30m', preAllocatedVUs: 500, maxVUs: 500, }, },
55-61:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid logging the full response body to prevent exposing sensitive data
In the catch block (lines 58-61), the code logs the entire response body when a JSON parsing error occurs. Logging the full response may expose sensitive information. Consider logging only the error message or a sanitized version of the response.
Apply this diff to adjust the logging:
} catch (e) { - console.log(`Unmarshal error: ${e} for body: ${r.body}`); + console.log(`JSON parse error: ${e.message}`); return false; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.try { const body = JSON.parse(r.body); return body && (body.error === undefined || body.error === null); } catch (e) { console.log(`JSON parse error: ${e.message}`); return false; }common/evm_json_rpc.go (5)
9-10:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential for deadlocks due to locking
jrqIntroducing
jrq.Lock()anddefer jrq.Unlock()adds concurrency control tojrq. Ensure that there are no other parts of the code that might lockjrqand cause a deadlock when this function is called.Consider reviewing the codebase for other locks on
jrqto prevent deadlocks. If nested locking is necessary, ensure that the locking order is consistent throughout the code.
44-58:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent handling of block number formats
In the
caseblocks starting at line 44, there's handling for both string and map parameter types, but the normalization logic may not cover all possible block number representations.Ensure that block numbers within maps and as separate parameters are consistently normalized, regardless of whether they are strings or numeric types. Consider adding checks for numeric types similar to earlier code.
80-91: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Combine similar code blocks to improve readability
The code for normalizing
fromBlockandtoBlockin theeth_getLogscase is similar. Consider extracting this logic into a helper function to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.Example:
func normalizeBlockParam(paramsMap map[string]interface{}, key string) { if value, ok := paramsMap[key]; ok { b, err := NormalizeHex(value) if err == nil { paramsMap[key] = b } } } // Then, in your case block: normalizeBlockParam(paramsMap, "fromBlock") normalizeBlockParam(paramsMap, "toBlock")
24-25:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential format issue when converting float to string
Using
fmt.Sprintf("%f", bkf)may include decimal points and fractional parts, which might not be appropriate for block numbers expected to be integers.Consider formatting the float without decimal places:
-bks = fmt.Sprintf("%f", bkf) +bks = fmt.Sprintf("%.0f", bkf)Or cast the float to an integer if safe:
-bks = fmt.Sprintf("%f", bkf) +bks = fmt.Sprintf("%d", int64(bkf))📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.bks = fmt.Sprintf("%.0f", bkf) b, err := NormalizeHex(bks)
20-36:
⚠️ Potential issueUninitialized variable
bksmay cause runtime errorsThe variable
bksmay not be initialized ifjrq.Params[0]is neither astringnor afloat64. However,bksis used later instrings.HasPrefix(bks, "0x"), which could lead to anilpointer dereference.Ensure
bksis properly initialized before it's used:if len(jrq.Params) > 0 { bks, ok := jrq.Params[0].(string) if !ok { bkf, ok := jrq.Params[0].(float64) if ok { bks = fmt.Sprintf("%f", bkf) b, err := NormalizeHex(bks) if err == nil { jrq.Params[0] = b } } + } else { + // Initialize bks to prevent nil usage + bks = "" } if strings.HasPrefix(bks, "0x") { b, err := NormalizeHex(bks) if err == nil { jrq.Params[0] = b } } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
data/mock_connector.go (4)
83-86:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd synchronization to
SetFakeDelayfor thread safety.If
MockMemoryConnectoris accessed concurrently, modifyingfakeDelaywithout synchronization could lead to race conditions.Introduce a mutex to protect
fakeDelay:import "sync" type MockMemoryConnector struct { *MemoryConnector fakeDelay time.Duration mu sync.RWMutex } func (m *MockMemoryConnector) SetFakeDelay(delay time.Duration) { m.mu.Lock() defer m.mu.Unlock() m.fakeDelay = delay } func (m *MockMemoryConnector) getFakeDelay() time.Duration { m.mu.RLock() defer m.mu.RUnlock() return m.fakeDelay }Update the
SetandGetmethods to usegetFakeDelay():func (m *MockMemoryConnector) Set(ctx context.Context, partitionKey, rangeKey, value string) error { - time.Sleep(m.fakeDelay) + time.Sleep(m.getFakeDelay()) return m.MemoryConnector.Set(ctx, partitionKey, rangeKey, value) }func (m *MockMemoryConnector) Get(ctx context.Context, index, partitionKey, rangeKey string) (string, error) { - time.Sleep(m.fakeDelay) + time.Sleep(m.getFakeDelay()) return m.MemoryConnector.Get(ctx, index, partitionKey, rangeKey) }
71-75:
⚠️ Potential issueUse context-aware delay to respect context cancellation in
Set.
time.Sleepdoes not consider context cancellation. To handle cancellation properly, use a context-aware delay.Apply this diff to make the delay context-aware:
func (m *MockMemoryConnector) Set(ctx context.Context, partitionKey, rangeKey, value string) error { - time.Sleep(m.fakeDelay) + select { + case <-time.After(m.fakeDelay): + // Proceed after delay + case <-ctx.Done(): + return ctx.Err() + } return m.MemoryConnector.Set(ctx, partitionKey, rangeKey, value) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Set overrides the base Set method to include a fake delay func (m *MockMemoryConnector) Set(ctx context.Context, partitionKey, rangeKey, value string) error { select { case <-time.After(m.fakeDelay): // Proceed after delay case <-ctx.Done(): return ctx.Err() } return m.MemoryConnector.Set(ctx, partitionKey, rangeKey, value) }
52-56: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider embedding a pointer to
MemoryConnectorfor efficiency.Currently,
MockMemoryConnectorembedsMemoryConnectorby value. Embedding by pointer avoids copying the entire struct and is more efficient, especially ifMemoryConnectorcontains state.Apply this diff to embed
MemoryConnectorby pointer:type MockMemoryConnector struct { - MemoryConnector + *MemoryConnector fakeDelay time.Duration }Update the constructor accordingly:
return &MockMemoryConnector{ - MemoryConnector: *baseConnector, + MemoryConnector: baseConnector, fakeDelay: fakeDelay, }, nilCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
77-81:
⚠️ Potential issueUse context-aware delay to respect context cancellation in
Get.Similar to
Set, theGetmethod should handle context cancellation during the delay.Apply this diff to make the delay context-aware:
func (m *MockMemoryConnector) Get(ctx context.Context, index, partitionKey, rangeKey string) (string, error) { - time.Sleep(m.fakeDelay) + select { + case <-time.After(m.fakeDelay): + // Proceed after delay + case <-ctx.Done(): + return "", ctx.Err() + } return m.MemoryConnector.Get(ctx, index, partitionKey, rangeKey) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Get overrides the base Get method to include a fake delay func (m *MockMemoryConnector) Get(ctx context.Context, index, partitionKey, rangeKey string) (string, error) { select { case <-time.After(m.fakeDelay): // Proceed after delay case <-ctx.Done(): return "", ctx.Err() } return m.MemoryConnector.Get(ctx, index, partitionKey, rangeKey) }data/memory.go (1)
45-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing TTL functionality or removing the methods
The
SetTTLmethod currently logs that TTLs are not implemented and returnsnil. If TTL functionality is not intended for theMemoryConnector, it might be clearer to remove theSetTTLmethod altogether or return an error indicating that the operation is not supported. This will prevent any confusion for users who might expect TTL functionality to be available.Consider returning an error to explicitly indicate the method is unsupported:
func (m *MemoryConnector) SetTTL(_ string, _ string) error { - m.logger.Debug().Msgf("Method TTLs not implemented for MemoryConnector") - return nil + return fmt.Errorf("SetTTL is not supported for MemoryConnector") }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (m *MemoryConnector) SetTTL(_ string, _ string) error { return fmt.Errorf("SetTTL is not supported for MemoryConnector") }data/redis.go (3)
27-27:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential concurrency issue with
ttlsmap accessThe
ttlsmap may be accessed concurrently by multiple goroutines, which can lead to race conditions since Go maps are not safe for concurrent read and write operations. Consider protecting thettlsmap with a mutex or using async.Mapto ensure thread safety.
93-93:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity concern with
InsecureSkipVerifyset to trueSetting
InsecureSkipVerifytotruedisables SSL certificate verification, which can expose the connection to man-in-the-middle attacks. It's recommended to avoid disabling SSL verification unless absolutely necessary. If this is required for development or testing purposes, ensure that it is not enabled in production environments.
137-141:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate the format of
rangeKeybefore splittingIn the line
method := strings.ToLower(strings.Split(rangeKey, ":")[0]), it is assumed thatrangeKeycontains a:character. IfrangeKeydoes not contain:, the extracted method may not be correct. Consider adding validation to ensurerangeKeyis in the expected format or handle cases where it does not contain:, to prevent potential logical errors.erpc/projects.go (1)
79-80:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential error from
nq.Method()At lines 79-80, the error returned by
nq.Method()is being ignored by assigning it to_. If there's a chance thatnq.Method()can return an error, it's important to handle it to prevent unexpected behavior.Consider modifying the code to handle the error:
-method, _ := nq.Method() +method, err := nq.Method() +if err != nil { + lg.Error().Err(err).Msg("Failed to get method from request") + return nil, err +}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
upstream/pimlico_http_json_rpc_client.go (2)
148-152:
⚠️ Potential issueSpecify the JSON path in
PeekStringByPath()The
PeekStringByPath()function requires a path argument to correctly extract the desired value from the JSON response. Omitting the path may lead to incorrect results or runtime errors.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- cids, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath() + cids, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath("result") if err != nil { return false, err }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.cids, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath("result") if err != nil { return false, err }
136-136:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider using a cryptographically secure random number generator
The current code uses
math/rand.Intnto generate a random ID, which is not suitable for security-sensitive operations. If the random ID is used in a context where unpredictability is important, consider usingcrypto/randto generate a cryptographically secure random number.Apply this diff to use
crypto/rand:-import ( - "math/rand" +import ( + "crypto/rand" + "math/big" ) ... - rid := rand.Intn(100_000_000) // #nosec G404 + nBig, err := rand.Int(rand.Reader, big.NewInt(100_000_000)) + if err != nil { + return false, err + } + rid := nBig.Int64()Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
common/response.go (6)
4-14:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve merge conflict markers in imports.
The code contains unresolved merge conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) in the import section. These markers indicate that there are conflicts that need to be manually resolved to ensure the code compiles correctly.
20-29:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve merge conflict markers in
NormalizedResponsestruct definition.Unresolved merge conflict markers are present in the declaration of the
NormalizedResponsestruct. Please resolve these conflicts to maintain the integrity of the struct's definition.
230-240:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve merge conflict markers in
EvmBlockNumbermethod.There are unresolved merge conflict markers within the
EvmBlockNumbermethod. It's crucial to resolve these to ensure the method functions as intended.
261-267:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve merge conflict markers in
EvmBlockNumbermethod implementation.Additional merge conflict markers are present in the implementation of the
EvmBlockNumbermethod. These need to be addressed to avoid compilation errors.
179-194:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for potential nil pointer dereference in
IsResultEmptyishmethod.Ensure that the method handles cases where
jrrmight benilafter callingJsonRpcResponse(), to avoid potential runtime panics.
202-218: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize locking in
IsObjectNullmethod.The method acquires multiple read locks (
resultMuanderrMu). Consider combining locks or reviewing the locking strategy to improve performance while maintaining thread safety.test/fake_server.go (8)
191-203: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve rate limiting implementation for realistic simulation
Using
rand.Float64()for rate limiting introduces randomness rather than enforcing a strict rate limit. Consider using a token bucket or leaky bucket algorithm to simulate rate limiting more accurately.Would you like assistance in implementing a more precise rate limiting mechanism?
191-203: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use HTTP status codes to indicate rate limiting
When simulating rate limiting, it's helpful to use appropriate HTTP status codes, such as
429 Too Many Requests, to indicate to clients that they are being rate limited.Apply this diff to set the HTTP status code:
if rand.Float64() < fs.LimitedRate { fs.mu.Lock() fs.requestsLimited++ fs.mu.Unlock() if req.ID != nil { + w.WriteHeader(http.StatusTooManyRequests) return &JSONRPCResponse{ Jsonrpc: "2.0", Error: map[string]interface{}{"code": -32000, "message": "simulated capacity exceeded"}, ID: req.ID, } } return nil // Notification, no response }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
108-112:
⚠️ Potential issueLimit the size of request bodies to prevent potential memory exhaustion
In
handleRequest, reading the entire request body usingio.ReadAllwithout size limitations can lead to memory exhaustion if a large request is sent. Consider setting a maximum allowable size for the request body.Apply this diff to limit the request body size:
func (fs *FakeServer) handleRequest(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { fs.mu.Lock() fs.requestsHandled++ fs.mu.Unlock() + // Limit the size of the request body to 1MB + r.Body = http.MaxBytesReader(w, r.Body, 1<<20) // 1MB + // Read the request body body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body) if err != nil { fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error") return }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Limit the size of the request body to 1MB r.Body = http.MaxBytesReader(w, r.Body, 1<<20) // 1MB body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body) if err != nil { fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error") return }
125-131:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle malformed JSON requests properly
When unmarshalling the request fails, the error response should conform to JSON-RPC specifications. Currently, the code returns an "Invalid Request" error, but according to the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification, a parse error (-32700) should be returned for invalid JSON.
Apply this diff to return the correct error code:
// Try to unmarshal as a single request var singleReq JSONRPCRequest err = json.Unmarshal(body, &singleReq) if err == nil { // Handle single request fs.handleSingleRequest(w, singleReq) return } -// Invalid JSON-RPC request -fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32600, "Invalid Request") +// Parse error +fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error")Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
264-275:
⚠️ Potential issuePrevent incomplete large data generation in sample responses
In
findMatchingSample, when generating large fake responses, the byte slice is allocated but not populated, resulting in a slice of zero bytes. Fill the slice with actual data to simulate realistic payloads.Apply this diff to populate the byte slice:
if txt, ok := sample.Response.Result.(string); ok { if strings.HasPrefix(txt, "bigfake:") { size, err := strconv.Atoi(txt[len("bigfake:"):]) fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size) if err != nil { return nil } // generate a random string with the size of the number - sample.Response.Result = make([]byte, size) + data := make([]byte, size) + rand.Read(data) + sample.Response.Result = data } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if txt, ok := sample.Response.Result.(string); ok { if strings.HasPrefix(txt, "bigfake:") { size, err := strconv.Atoi(txt[len("bigfake:"):]) fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size) if err != nil { return nil } // generate a random string with the size of the number data := make([]byte, size) rand.Read(data) sample.Response.Result = data } }
145-150:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle notifications correctly in batch requests
In
handleBatchRequest, responses for notifications (requests withnullID) should not be included in the response array, according to the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification. Adjust the code to exclude responses for notifications.Apply this diff to skip responses for notifications:
for _, req := range batchReq { response := fs.processSingleRequest(req) if response != nil { + if response.ID == nil { + continue // Skip notifications + } response.ID = req.ID responses = append(responses, *response) } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.response := fs.processSingleRequest(req) if response != nil { if response.ID == nil { continue // Skip notifications } response.ID = req.ID responses = append(responses, *response) } }
54-58:
⚠️ Potential issueInitialize
samplesfield to prevent potential nil pointer dereferenceIn the
NewFakeServerfunction, ifloadSamplesfails,fs.samplesmay remainnil, which could lead to anilpointer dereference infindMatchingSample. Consider initializingfs.samplesto an empty slice to avoid this issue.Apply this diff to ensure
fs.samplesis initialized:func NewFakeServer(port int, failureRate float64, limitedRate float64, minDelay, maxDelay time.Duration, sampleFilePath string) (*FakeServer, error) { fs := &FakeServer{ Port: port, FailureRate: failureRate, + LimitedRate: limitedRate, + MinDelay: minDelay, + MaxDelay: maxDelay, + samples: []RequestResponseSample{}, } if err := fs.loadSamples(sampleFilePath); err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to load samples: %w", err) }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
175-185:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for nil
req.IDto handle notifications correctlyIn
processSingleRequest, when returning an error response for invalid requests, theIDshould benullif it was not provided in the request, according to the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification. Ensure that theIDis set appropriately.Apply this diff to set
IDtonilwhen it is not provided:// Validate request if req.Jsonrpc != "2.0" || req.Method == "" { fs.mu.Lock() fs.requestsFailed++ fs.mu.Unlock() return &JSONRPCResponse{ Jsonrpc: "2.0", Error: map[string]interface{}{"code": -32600, "message": "Invalid Request"}, - ID: req.ID, + ID: req.ID, // This should be null if req.ID is missing } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
erpc/evm_json_rpc_cache.go (1)
130-132:
⚠️ Potential issueFix Error Handling in Caching Decision
If
shouldCacheisfalseanderrisnil, returningerr(which isnil) could incorrectly indicate success. Adjust the error handling to returnnilonly when appropriate.Apply this diff to correct the error handling:
if !shouldCache || err != nil { - return err + if err != nil { + return err + } + return nil }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.shouldCache, err := shouldCacheResponse(lg, req, resp, rpcReq, rpcResp) if !shouldCache || err != nil { if err != nil { return err } return nil }common/evm_block_ref.go (3)
50-52: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated block hash length checks into a helper function
The length check
if len(bns) == 66is used in multiple places to identify block hashes (which are 32 bytes, resulting in a 66-character string including the0xprefix). Refactoring this logic into a helper function would reduce code duplication and enhance maintainability.Create a helper function
IsBlockHash:+func IsBlockHash(s string) bool { + return strings.HasPrefix(s, "0x") && len(s) == 66 +}Then update the repeated checks:
-if len(bns) == 66 { +if IsBlockHash(bns) { return bns, 0, nil }Also applies to: 90-92, 115-117, 191-193
254-255:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle errors from
PeekStringByPathto ensure robust parsingIn
ExtractEvmBlockReferenceFromResponse, the errors returned byPeekStringByPathare currently ignored. While ignoringnilvalues might be acceptable, unexpected parsing errors could go unnoticed, potentially leading to incorrect behavior. It's prudent to handle these errors to improve the robustness of the code.Modify the code to handle errors:
-blockRef, _ := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("blockHash") +blockRef, err := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("blockHash") +if err != nil { + return "", 0, err +} -blockNumberStr, _ := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("blockNumber") +blockNumberStr, err := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("blockNumber") +if err != nil { + return blockRef, 0, err +}Also applies to: 274-275
253-291:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for nil
Resultto prevent potential panicsIn
ExtractEvmBlockReferenceFromResponse, the conditionif len(rpcResp.Result) > 0assumes thatrpcResp.Resultis notnil. IfResultisnil, accessing it could cause a panic. Safely check fornilbefore evaluating its length.Modify the condition:
-if len(rpcResp.Result) > 0 { +if rpcResp.Result != nil && len(rpcResp.Result) > 0 {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if rpcResp.Result != nil && len(rpcResp.Result) > 0 { blockRef, _ := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("blockHash") blockNumberStr, _ := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("blockNumber") var blockNumber int64 if blockNumberStr != "" { bn, err := HexToInt64(blockNumberStr) if err != nil { return "", 0, err } blockNumber = bn } if blockRef == "" && blockNumber > 0 { blockRef = strconv.FormatInt(blockNumber, 10) } return blockRef, blockNumber, nil } case "eth_getBlockByNumber": if rpcResp.Result != nil && len(rpcResp.Result) > 0 { blockRef, _ := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("hash") blockNumberStr, _ := rpcResp.PeekStringByPath("number") var blockNumber int64 if blockNumberStr != "" { bn, err := HexToInt64(blockNumberStr) if err != nil { return "", 0, err } blockNumber = bn } if blockRef == "" && blockNumber > 0 { blockRef = strconv.FormatInt(blockNumber, 10) } return blockRef, blockNumber, nil }upstream/evm_state_poller.go (2)
318-322:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle missing 'number' field in block data
When calling
PeekStringByPath("number"), if thenumberfield is missing ornil, it could lead to unexpected errors. Ensure that the absence of thenumberfield is gracefully handled, possibly by adding a check fornilbefore proceeding.Apply this diff to handle the missing 'number' field:
numberStr, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath("number") if err != nil { return 0, &common.BaseError{ Code: "ErrEvmStatePoller", - Message: "cannot get block number from block data", + Message: "block number field is missing in block data", Details: map[string]interface{}{ "blockTag": blockTag, "result": jrr.Result, }, } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
356-368:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle both boolean and object responses from
eth_syncingThe
eth_syncingmethod can return eitherfalse(a boolean) when the node is not syncing or an object with syncing details when the node is syncing. Unmarshalling directly into a boolean will fail when the result is an object. Modify the code to handle both scenarios appropriately.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
var syncing bool -err = common.SonicCfg.Unmarshal(jrr.Result, &syncing) +if string(jrr.Result) == "false" { + syncing = false +} else { + syncing = true +} +if err != nil { + // Handle any potential errors here +} return syncing, nilCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
common/request.go (1)
43-47:
⚠️ Potential issueUnresolved merge conflict markers detected throughout the code
Unresolved merge conflict markers (
<<<<<<< HEAD,=======,>>>>>>>) are present at multiple locations in the file (lines 43-47, 58-64, 85-91, 99-107, 115-120, 128-133, 143-153, 159-172). This indicates that the merge conflicts have not been properly resolved. Please resolve these conflicts to ensure the code is correct and compilable.Also applies to: 58-64, 85-91, 99-107, 115-120, 128-133, 143-153, 159-172
upstream/registry.go (2)
171-173: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring nested map initialization to reduce duplication
The initialization of nested maps for
u.upstreamScoresis repeated multiple times. Refactoring this into a helper function would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.Here's how you might refactor the code:
func (u *UpstreamsRegistry) ensureUpstreamScore(upid, networkId, method string) { if _, ok := u.upstreamScores[upid]; !ok { u.upstreamScores[upid] = make(map[string]map[string]float64) } if _, ok := u.upstreamScores[upid][networkId]; !ok { u.upstreamScores[upid][networkId] = make(map[string]float64) } if _, ok := u.upstreamScores[upid][networkId][method]; !ok { u.upstreamScores[upid][networkId][method] = 0 } }Then, you can replace the repeated initialization code with a single function call:
u.ensureUpstreamScore(upid, networkId, method)
361-366: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify logging and remove unnecessary log level check
You can simplify the logging by removing the explicit log level check. Zerolog handles log level checks internally, so the condition is redundant. Additionally, use the
Strsmethod to log the slice of upstream IDs directly.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
-if u.logger.GetLevel() >= zerolog.TraceLevel { - newSortStr := "" - for _, ups := range upsList { - newSortStr += fmt.Sprintf("%s ", ups.Config().Id) - } - u.logger.Trace().Str("projectId", u.prjId).Str("networkId", networkId).Str("method", method).Str("newSort", newSortStr).Msgf("sorted upstreams") -} +upsIDs := make([]string, len(upsList)) +for i, ups := range upsList { + upsIDs[i] = ups.Config().Id +} +u.logger.Trace(). + Str("projectId", u.prjId). + Str("networkId", networkId). + Str("method", method). + Strs("newSort", upsIDs). + Msg("sorted upstreams")This refactoring enhances readability and leverages zerolog's features for more efficient logging.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.upsIDs := make([]string, len(upsList)) for i, ups := range upsList { upsIDs[i] = ups.Config().Id } u.logger.Trace(). Str("projectId", u.prjId). Str("networkId", networkId). Str("method", method). Strs("newSort", upsIDs). Msg("sorted upstreams")erpc/networks.go (4)
25-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider potential performance implications of
sync.MapReplacing the
inFlightRequestsmap with a*sync.Mapsimplifies concurrency management. However,sync.Mapis optimized for cases with high read-to-write ratios and may not perform well under heavy write contention. IfinFlightRequestsinvolves frequent writes or deletions, a standard map with a mutex might offer better performance.
85-86:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure safe type assertion to prevent panics
The type assertion
vinf.(*Multiplexer)can cause a panic ifvinfis not of type*Multiplexer. To avoid this, consider using the comma-ok idiom to safely assert the type:if infCandidate, ok := vinf.(*Multiplexer); ok { inf = infCandidate // proceed with inf } else { // handle the unexpected type lg.Error().Msgf("unexpected type in inFlightRequests") // possibly delete the entry or take corrective action }This approach prevents potential panics due to incorrect type assumptions.
366-369: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review the necessity of nil checks on the receiver
The check for
n == nilwithin the methodEvmIsBlockFinalizedmight be unnecessary. Since this is a method on theNetworktype, and calling it on anilreceiver is uncommon, consider removing this check unless there is a specific use case wherencan benil.
414-423:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for potential nil references in state poller enrichment
When accessing
resp.Upstream().Config().Id, there is a risk of a nil reference ifresp.Upstream()orresp.Upstream().Config()returnsnil. Add nil checks to prevent possible panics:if resp.Upstream() != nil && resp.Upstream().Config() != nil { poller, ok := n.evmStatePollers[resp.Upstream().Config().Id] // proceed with poller }common/json_rpc.go (7)
333-339: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize MarshalJSON to prevent unnecessary memory allocations
The
MarshalJSONmethod reads the entire JSON into memory, which can be inefficient for large responses. Since the comment mentions thatMarshalJSONshould not be used for most use cases, consider removing or deprecating this method to prevent misuse.Alternatively, if the method must remain, add a warning in the documentation and consider ways to optimize it.
347-352: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure proper locking order to prevent potential deadlocks
In the
GetReadermethod, locks are acquired foridMu,errMu, andresultMuwithout a consistent order. This inconsistent locking order can lead to deadlocks if other methods lock these mutexes in a different order.Standardize the locking order across all methods. For example, always lock
idMufirst, thenerrMu, thenresultMu:r.idMu.RLock() r.errMu.RLock() r.resultMu.RLock() defer r.idMu.RUnlock() defer r.errMu.RUnlock() defer r.resultMu.RUnlock()Ensure that all methods accessing these mutexes follow the same locking order.
347-349: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid redundant defer statements within loops
In the
GetReadermethod, the use ofdeferwithin a loop can lead to deferred calls piling up, which might not be executed until the function returns. This can have unintended side effects on performance and resource utilization.Consider restructuring the code to minimize the use of
deferwithin loops or tight code sections. Locking can be handled withoutdeferwhen the scope is clear.r.idMu.RLock() // operations using idMu r.idMu.RUnlock() // Similarly for errMu and resultMuThis makes the locking and unlocking explicit and can improve readability and performance.
209-274: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify error parsing logic in ParseError method
The
ParseErrormethod contains complex logic with multiple special cases for parsing errors. This complexity can make the code harder to maintain and may introduce bugs. Consider refactoring the method to simplify error handling.One way to simplify is to unmarshal into a generic map and check for the presence of "code" and "message" keys:
func (r *JsonRpcResponse) ParseError(raw string) error { r.errMu.Lock() defer r.errMu.Unlock() r.errBytes = nil - // Complex special case handling... + // Unmarshal into a generic map to check for "code" and "message" + var errMap map[string]interface{} + if err := SonicCfg.UnmarshalFromString(raw, &errMap); err != nil { + return err + } + if errorData, exists := errMap["error"].(map[string]interface{}); exists { + if code, ok := errorData["code"].(float64); ok { + if message, ok := errorData["message"].(string); ok { + r.Error = NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( + int(code), + message, + "", + ) + r.errBytes = util.Str2Mem(raw) + return nil + } + } + } + + // If no error field or unable to parse, set a generic error + r.Error = NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( + int(JsonRpcErrorServerSideException), + raw, + "", + ) + return nil }This refactoring reduces complexity and makes the error parsing more robust.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
404-410: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueDeep copy mutable fields in Clone method
The
Clonemethod copies pointers of mutable fields likeidBytes,errBytes, andResult. This can lead to shared references where changes to one instance affect the other. To prevent this, deep copy these byte slices.Modify the
Clonemethod to deep copy mutable fields:return &JsonRpcResponse{ id: r.id, - idBytes: r.idBytes, - Error: r.Error, - errBytes: r.errBytes, - Result: r.Result, + idBytes: append([]byte{}, r.idBytes...), + Error: r.Error, // Assuming Error is immutable or handle deep copy if necessary + errBytes: append([]byte{}, r.errBytes...), + Result: append([]byte{}, r.Result...), cachedNode: r.cachedNode, // Consider deep copying if necessary }, nilReview whether
ErrorandcachedNoderequire deep copies based on their mutability.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.id: r.id, idBytes: append([]byte{}, r.idBytes...), Error: r.Error, // Assuming Error is immutable or handle deep copy if necessary errBytes: append([]byte{}, r.errBytes...), Result: append([]byte{}, r.Result...), cachedNode: r.cachedNode, // Consider deep copying if necessary }, nil
419-419:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid embedding sync.RWMutex directly into structs
Embedding
sync.RWMutexdirectly into theJsonRpcRequeststruct can lead to unintended behavior, especially if the struct is copied after use. Mutexes should be used as named fields to prevent accidental copying and to make the code more maintainable.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-type JsonRpcRequest struct { - sync.RWMutex +type JsonRpcRequest struct { + mu sync.RWMutexUpdate the code to use
r.mu.RLock(),r.mu.RUnlock(),r.mu.Lock(), andr.mu.Unlock()accordingly.Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
427-473: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueImprove ID parsing in UnmarshalJSON method
In the
UnmarshalJSONmethod ofJsonRpcRequest, when the ID is a string, parsing it into afloat64and then converting toint64can lead to precision loss or incorrect results for large integer IDs represented as strings. It's better to parse the string directly into anint64.Apply this diff to handle string IDs correctly:
case string: if v == "" { r.ID = util.RandomID() } else { - var parsedID float64 - if err := SonicCfg.Unmarshal([]byte(v), &parsedID); err != nil { + parsedID, err := strconv.ParseInt(v, 10, 64) + if err != nil { return err } - r.ID = int64(parsedID) + r.ID = parsedID }This ensures that string IDs are parsed accurately without loss of precision.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (r *JsonRpcRequest) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error { type Alias JsonRpcRequest aux := &struct { *Alias ID json.RawMessage `json:"id,omitempty"` }{ Alias: (*Alias)(r), } aux.JSONRPC = "2.0" if err := SonicCfg.Unmarshal(data, &aux); err != nil { return err } if aux.ID == nil { r.ID = util.RandomID() } else { var id interface{} if err := SonicCfg.Unmarshal(aux.ID, &id); err != nil { return err } switch v := id.(type) { case float64: r.ID = int64(v) case string: if v == "" { r.ID = util.RandomID() } else { parsedID, err := strconv.ParseInt(v, 10, 64) if err != nil { return err } r.ID = parsedID } case nil: r.ID = util.RandomID() default: r.ID = util.RandomID() } } if r.ID == 0 { r.ID = util.RandomID() } return nil }common/config.go (1)
86-86:
⚠️ Potential issueTypo in struct tag:
yamleshould beyamlThere's a typo in the struct tag for the
TTLfield; it should beyaml:"ttl"instead ofyamle:"ttl"to ensure proper YAML unmarshalling.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
type MethodCacheConfig struct { Method string `yaml:"method" json:"method"` - TTL string `yamle:"ttl" json:"ttl"` + TTL string `yaml:"ttl" json:"ttl"` }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.TTL string `yaml:"ttl" json:"ttl"`erpc/http_server.go (8)
84-85:
⚠️ Potential issueSetting
SetEscapeHTML(false)May Introduce XSS VulnerabilitiesDisabling HTML escaping can lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks if the data being encoded includes untrusted input. Ensure all response data is properly sanitized.
If HTML escaping is intentionally disabled, verify that all inputs to the encoder are safe and cannot contain malicious content.
300-327: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify and Validate URL Path Parsing Logic
The
parseUrlPathfunction can be simplified for clarity and to reduce the potential for errors. Additionally, validate that the URL segments are correctly extracted and handle unexpected values gracefully.Consider refactoring the conditional statements and using a switch-case for better readability:
func (s *HttpServer) parseUrlPath(fctx *fasthttp.RequestCtx) (projectId, architecture, chainId string, isAdmin, isHealthCheck bool, err error) { isPost := fctx.IsPost() ps := path.Clean(util.Mem2Str(fctx.Path())) segments := strings.Split(ps, "/") switch { case isPost && len(segments) == 4: projectId = segments[1] architecture = segments[2] chainId = segments[3] case isPost && len(segments) == 3 && segments[2] == "admin": projectId = segments[1] isAdmin = true case len(segments) == 2 && segments[1] == "healthcheck": isHealthCheck = true default: err = common.NewErrInvalidUrlPath(ps) } return projectId, architecture, chainId, isAdmin, isHealthCheck, err }
385-406: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify Error Handling Logic in
setResponseHeadersThe error handling in the
setResponseHeadersfunction is complex and may be difficult to maintain. Consider simplifying the type assertions and error checks for better readability.Refactor the nested type checks and error unwrapping to make the code more maintainable.
549-552:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle Errors When Closing IPv4 Listener Gracefully
In the
Startmethod, when attempting to close the IPv4 listener due to an error with the IPv6 listener, ensure that any errors encountered while closing are properly handled.Consider logging the error when closing the IPv4 listener fails and continue the shutdown process gracefully.
76-80:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid Exposing Internal Error Details to Clients
Returning detailed error messages including stack traces to clients can expose sensitive internal information and aid malicious actors. Instead, log the detailed error internally and send a generic error message to the client.
Apply this diff to send a generic message to the client:
- msg := fmt.Sprintf("unexpected server panic on top-level handler: %v -> %s", r, util.Mem2Str(debug.Stack())) + s.logger.Error().Msgf("unexpected server panic on top-level handler: %v -> %s", r, util.Mem2Str(debug.Stack())) fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) fastCtx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") - fastCtx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, msg)) + fastCtx.SetBodyString(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"Internal server error"}}`)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.s.logger.Error().Msgf("unexpected server panic on top-level handler: %v -> %s", r, util.Mem2Str(debug.Stack())) fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) fastCtx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") fastCtx.SetBodyString(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"Internal server error"}}`)
517-525:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for Encoding Errors Before Setting Headers
When encoding the error response in
handleErrorResponse, ensure that you check for encoding errors before setting response headers to avoid sending incomplete or incorrect responses.Apply this diff to adjust the error handling:
err = encoder.Encode(resp) if err != nil { logger.Error().Err(err).Msgf("failed to encode error response") ctx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) ctx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") ctx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, err.Error())) } else { - ctx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
279-295:
⚠️ Potential issueConsistent Error Handling in Single Response Scenario
When handling a single response, ensure that errors during encoding are consistently managed, and appropriate status codes and messages are returned to the client.
Apply this diff to align error handling with the batch processing logic:
if r, ok := res.(*common.NormalizedResponse); ok { rdr, err := r.GetReader() if err != nil { fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) fastCtx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, err.Error())) return } fastCtx.Response.SetBodyStream(rdr, -1) r.Release() } else { err = encoder.Encode(res) + if err != nil { + fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) + fastCtx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, err.Error())) + return + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if r, ok := res.(*common.NormalizedResponse); ok { rdr, err := r.GetReader() if err != nil { fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) fastCtx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, err.Error())) return } fastCtx.Response.SetBodyStream(rdr, -1) r.Release() } else { err = encoder.Encode(res) if err != nil { fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) fastCtx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, err.Error())) return } }
450-462:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid Holding Locks Longer Than Necessary
In
processErrorBody, the read lock onnqis held during logging. To prevent potential performance bottlenecks, acquire the lock only when accessing shared data and release it promptly.Apply this diff to minimize the lock duration:
if !common.IsNull(err) { if nq != nil { - nq.RLock() } if common.HasErrorCode(err, common.ErrCodeEndpointClientSideException) { logger.Debug().Err(err).Object("request", nq).Msgf("forward request errored with client-side exception") } else { if e, ok := err.(common.StandardError); ok { logger.Error().Err(err).Object("request", nq).Msgf("failed to forward request: %s", e.DeepestMessage()) } else { logger.Error().Err(err).Object("request", nq).Msgf("failed to forward request: %s", err.Error()) } } - if nq != nil { - nq.RUnlock() - } }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
upstream/http_json_json_client_test.go (2)
200-202:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace
panicwitht.Fatalffor better test failure reportingUsing
panicin test code can abruptly terminate the test suite and doesn't provide as clear feedback as the testing framework's error handling. Consider replacingpanicwitht.Fatalfto report the error in a more informative and controlled manner.Apply this diff to improve error handling:
if resp1 == nil { - panic(fmt.Sprintf("SeparateBatchRequestsWithSameIDs: resp1 is nil err1: %v", err1)) + t.Fatalf("SeparateBatchRequestsWithSameIDs: resp1 is nil, err: %v", err1) }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if resp1 == nil { t.Fatalf("SeparateBatchRequestsWithSameIDs: resp1 is nil, err: %v", err1) }
609-610:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid tight timing assertions to prevent flaky tests
Asserting that the duration is within a narrow time window (740ms to 780ms) can lead to flaky tests due to timing variations in different environments. Consider loosening the bounds or focusing on the timeout error.
Apply this diff to adjust the assertions:
- assert.Greater(t, dur, 740*time.Millisecond) - assert.Less(t, dur, 780*time.Millisecond) + assert.Greater(t, dur, 700*time.Millisecond) + assert.Less(t, dur, 800*time.Millisecond)Alternatively, you can remove the duration assertions and focus on verifying that a timeout occurred:
- assert.Greater(t, dur, 700*time.Millisecond) - assert.Less(t, dur, 800*time.Millisecond) + assert.Error(t, err) + assert.Contains(t, err.Error(), "remote endpoint request timeout")Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
upstream/http_json_rpc_client.go (3)
310-313: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider disabling JSON validation when parsing responses
In the code,
searcher.ValidateJSONis set tofalse, which disables JSON validation when parsing the upstream responses. This might lead to unexpected behavior if the response contains malformed JSON. Enabling JSON validation can help ensure that the JSON parsing is robust and can catch potential issues early.Apply this diff to enable JSON validation:
searcher := ast.NewSearcher(util.Mem2Str(bodyBytes)) searcher.CopyReturn = false searcher.ConcurrentRead = false -searcher.ValidateJSON = false +searcher.ValidateJSON = true📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.searcher := ast.NewSearcher(util.Mem2Str(bodyBytes)) searcher.CopyReturn = false searcher.ConcurrentRead = false searcher.ValidateJSON = true
696-713:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure safe type assertion to prevent panics
At line 697, the code performs a type assertion
msg.(string)without checking if the assertion is valid. Ifmsgis not of typestring, this will cause a panic. It's safer to use the two-value form of the type assertion to handle the case wheremsgis not a string.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
if dt, ok := err.Data.(map[string]interface{}); ok { if msg, ok := dt["message"]; ok { - if strings.Contains(msg.(string), "validation errors in batch") { + if msgStr, ok := msg.(string); ok { + if strings.Contains(msgStr, "validation errors in batch") { // Existing code - } + } + } } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if msg, ok := dt["message"]; ok { if msgStr, ok := msg.(string); ok { if strings.Contains(msgStr, "validation errors in batch") { // Intentionally return a server-side error for failed requests in a batch // so they are retried in a different batch. // TODO Should we split a batch instead on json-rpc client level? return common.NewErrEndpointServerSideException( common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionInternal( int(code), common.JsonRpcErrorServerSideException, err.Message, nil, details, ), nil, ) } } } }
416-436:
⚠️ Potential issueFix potential nil pointer dereference in
getJsonRpcResponseFromNodeIn the
getJsonRpcResponseFromNodefunction,jrRespis declared but not initialized before callingjrResp.SetIDBytes(...). This can lead to a nil pointer dereference and panic when bothrawResultErr != nilandrawErrorErr != nil. To fix this issue, initializejrRespbefore using it.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
func getJsonRpcResponseFromNode(rootNode ast.Node) (*common.JsonRpcResponse, error) { idNode := rootNode.GetByPath("id") rawID, _ := idNode.Raw() resultNode := rootNode.GetByPath("result") rawResult, rawResultErr := resultNode.Raw() errorNode := rootNode.GetByPath("error") rawError, rawErrorErr := errorNode.Raw() if rawResultErr != nil && rawErrorErr != nil { - var jrResp *common.JsonRpcResponse + jrResp := &common.JsonRpcResponse{} if rawID != "" { err := jrResp.SetIDBytes(util.Str2Mem(rawID)) if err != nil { return nil, err } } cause := fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse json rpc response from upstream, for result: %s, for error: %s", rawResult, rawError) - jrResp = &common.JsonRpcResponse{ + jrResp.Result = util.Str2Mem(rawResult) + jrResp.Error = common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( int(common.JsonRpcErrorParseException), cause, "", ) - } return jrResp, nil }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if rawResultErr != nil && rawErrorErr != nil { jrResp := &common.JsonRpcResponse{} if rawID != "" { err := jrResp.SetIDBytes(util.Str2Mem(rawID)) if err != nil { return nil, err } } cause := fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse json rpc response from upstream, for result: %s, for error: %s", rawResult, rawError) jrResp.Result = util.Str2Mem(rawResult) jrResp.Error = common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( int(common.JsonRpcErrorParseException), cause, "", ) return jrResp, nilerpc/http_server_test.go (3)
341-341:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary debug print statement
The
fmt.Println(body)statement in the testInvalidJSONis likely a leftover from debugging and should be removed to keep the test output clean.Apply this diff to remove the debug print statement:
341d340 - fmt.Println(body)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
595-597:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect conditional and error message in test
The conditional logic in the
AutoAddIDWhen0IsProvidedtest is incorrect. The condition should check ifidis not zero, and the error message should reflect the actual expectation.Apply this diff to correct the conditional and error message:
595,597c595,597 - if id == 0 { - t.Fatalf("Expected id to be 0, got %d from body: %s", id, bodyStr) - } + if id != 0 { + t.Fatalf("Expected id to be 0, got %d from body: %s", id, bodyStr) + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if id != 0 { t.Fatalf("Expected id to be 0, got %d from body: %s", id, bodyStr) }
779-787:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove deferred call to gock.Off() to prevent mocks from being disabled prematurely
In the
createServerTestFixturesfunction, thedefer gock.Off()statement will execute when the function returns, potentially disabling the HTTP mocks before the tests complete.Consider removing the
defer gock.Off()from this function and managing the lifecycle ofgockin the calling function to ensure that mocks remain active for the duration of the tests.Apply this diff to remove the deferred call:
786,787d785 - defer gock.Off() -📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func(body string, headers map[string]string, queryParams map[string]string) (int, string), string, ) { gock.EnableNetworking() gock.NetworkingFilter(func(req *http.Request) bool { shouldMakeRealCall := strings.Split(req.URL.Host, ":")[0] == "localhost" return shouldMakeRealCall })common/errors.go (5)
943-957: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add
ErrorStatusCodemethod toErrUpstreamSyncingFor consistency with other error types, consider adding an
ErrorStatusCode()method toErrUpstreamSyncingto specify the appropriate HTTP status code.For example:
func (e *ErrUpstreamSyncing) ErrorStatusCode() int { return http.StatusServiceUnavailable }
959-971: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add
ErrorStatusCodemethod toErrUpstreamNotAllowedAdding an
ErrorStatusCode()method toErrUpstreamNotAllowedwill ensure consistent error handling and allow you to specify the appropriate HTTP status code.For example:
func (e *ErrUpstreamNotAllowed) ErrorStatusCode() int { return http.StatusForbidden }
460-474: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Define error code as a constant in
ErrNotImplementedFor consistency with other error types, consider defining the error code
"ErrNotImplemented"as a constant.Apply this diff to define the error code as a constant:
+const ErrCodeNotImplemented ErrorCode = "ErrNotImplemented" type ErrNotImplemented struct{ BaseError } var NewErrNotImplemented = func(msg string) error { return &ErrNotImplemented{ BaseError{ - Code: "ErrNotImplemented", + Code: ErrCodeNotImplemented, Message: msg, }, } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const ErrCodeNotImplemented ErrorCode = "ErrNotImplemented" type ErrNotImplemented struct{ BaseError } var NewErrNotImplemented = func(msg string) error { return &ErrNotImplemented{ BaseError{ Code: ErrCodeNotImplemented, Message: msg, }, } } func (e *ErrNotImplemented) ErrorStatusCode() int { return http.StatusNotImplemented }
939-941: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use appropriate HTTP status code in
ErrUpstreamMethodIgnoredReturning
http.StatusUnsupportedMediaType(415) may not accurately represent the error. Consider usinghttp.StatusMethodNotAllowed(405) orhttp.StatusNotImplemented(501) to better reflect that the method is not allowed or not implemented by the upstream.Apply this diff to change the status code:
func (e *ErrUpstreamMethodIgnored) ErrorStatusCode() int { - return http.StatusUnsupportedMediaType + return http.StatusMethodNotAllowed }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.func (e *ErrUpstreamMethodIgnored) ErrorStatusCode() int { return http.StatusMethodNotAllowed }
1015-1030:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure consistent error chaining in
NewErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshalWhen
causeis not nil, theCausefield should be set to maintain proper error chaining and improve error tracing.Apply this diff to set the
Causefield consistently:} else if cause != nil { return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ BaseError{ Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, - Message: fmt.Sprintf("%s", cause), + Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", + Cause: cause, }, }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if _, ok := cause.(*BaseError); ok { return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ BaseError{ Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", Cause: cause, }, } } else if cause != nil { return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ BaseError{ Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", Cause: cause, }, } }erpc/networks_test.go (2)
1236-1260:
⚠️ Potential issueValidate memory usage assertion in test
In the test
ForwardWithMinimumMemoryAllocation, the assertion compares memory usage after garbage collection with an expected value. However, garbage collection may not immediately reclaim all memory, leading to flaky tests. Consider using more reliable methods for measuring memory usage or adjusting thresholds.Consider adjusting the test to account for potential discrepancies in memory measurement.
4316-4398:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error assertion in
ForwardIgnoredMethodtestIn the
ForwardIgnoredMethodtest, the error is checked usingcommon.HasErrorCode, but if the error is nil, this will cause a nil pointer dereference. Ensure that you check for a non-nil error before asserting the error code.Apply this diff to add error nil check:
+ if err == nil { + t.Fatalf("Expected non-nil error, got nil") + } if !common.HasErrorCode(err, common.ErrCodeUpstreamMethodIgnored) { t.Fatalf("Expected error code %v, got %v", common.ErrCodeUpstreamMethodIgnored, err) }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
erpc/healthcheck.go (3)
40-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make the error rate threshold configurable
The error rate threshold of
0.99is hardcoded. Making it configurable increases flexibility and allows adjustments without changing the code.Define a constant or configuration parameter for the threshold:
const upstreamErrorRateThreshold = 0.99Update the comparison:
sort.Float64s(allErrorRates) - if allErrorRates[0] > 0.99 { + if allErrorRates[0] > upstreamErrorRateThreshold { handleErrorResponse(&logger, nil, fmt.Errorf("all upstreams are down: %+v", allErrorRates), ctx, encoder) return }
51-52: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Set the Content-Type header for the response
To ensure clients interpret the response correctly, explicitly set the
Content-Typeheader.Apply this diff to set the
Content-Typeheader:ctx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusOK) + ctx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "text/plain; charset=utf-8") ctx.SetBodyString("OK")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ctx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusOK) ctx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "text/plain; charset=utf-8") ctx.SetBodyString("OK")
22-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider handling individual project errors without aborting the health check
Currently, if
project.gatherHealthInfo()returns an error for any project, the health check responds with an error and exits. To improve robustness, consider logging the error and continuing to check the health of the remaining projects.Apply this diff to modify the error handling:
h, err := project.gatherHealthInfo() - if err != nil { - handleErrorResponse(&logger, nil, err, ctx, encoder) - return - } + if err != nil { + logger.Error().Err(err).Msgf("Failed to gather health info for project %v", project.Name) + continue + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for _, project := range projects { h, err := project.gatherHealthInfo() if err != nil { logger.Error().Err(err).Msgf("Failed to gather health info for project %v", project.Name) continue }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 66
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (59)
util/json_rpc.go (1)
8-8: Consider adding a security note to the function comment.The current comment is informative, but it would be beneficial to add a note about the security implications of using
math/rand.Consider updating the comment to include a security note:
- // RandomID returns a value appropriate for a JSON-RPC ID field (i.e int64 type but with 32 bit range) to avoid overflow during conversions and reading/sending to upstreams + // RandomID returns a value appropriate for a JSON-RPC ID field (i.e int64 type but with 32 bit range) to avoid overflow during conversions and reading/sending to upstreams. + // Note: This function uses math/rand and is not suitable for cryptographic purposes.erpc/multiplexer.go (2)
25-31: LGTM: Excellent use ofsync.Oncefor thread-safe closingThe modification of the
Closemethod to useonce.Do()is an excellent improvement. It ensures that the closing operation is performed only once, even if the method is called multiple times concurrently. This change enhances the thread-safety and idempotency of theCloseoperation.Consider adding a debug log or returning an error if
Closeis called more than once. This could help with debugging in complex scenarios:func (inf *Multiplexer) Close(resp *common.NormalizedResponse, err error) error { var alreadyClosed bool inf.once.Do(func() { inf.mu.Lock() defer inf.mu.Unlock() inf.resp = resp inf.err = err close(inf.done) }) if alreadyClosed { return errors.New("multiplexer already closed") } alreadyClosed = true return nil }
Line range hint
1-31: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements to thread-safetyThe changes made to this file significantly enhance the thread-safety of the
Multiplexerstruct, particularly in itsClosemethod. The addition ofsync.Onceand its use inCloseensure that the closing operation is performed only once, even in concurrent scenarios. These modifications align well with Go's best practices for concurrent programming and contribute positively to the overall robustness of the codebase.As the codebase evolves, consider applying similar patterns to other parts of the system that may benefit from guaranteed single execution in concurrent environments. This consistent approach to thread-safety will help maintain the reliability of the entire system.
common/evm.go (1)
12-21: LGTM! Consider minor improvements for clarity and potential future scalability.The
IsEvmWriteMethodfunction is well-implemented and serves its purpose effectively. It correctly identifies Ethereum JSON-RPC write methods, which is valuable for various use cases such as access control or logging.To further enhance this function:
- Consider adding a comment explaining the function's purpose and the significance of these methods.
- If the list of methods is expected to grow significantly in the future, consider using a map or switch statement for potentially better performance.
Here's a suggested improvement with added comments:
// IsEvmWriteMethod checks if the given method is an Ethereum JSON-RPC write method. // These methods modify the blockchain state and typically require special permissions. func IsEvmWriteMethod(method string) bool { // List of Ethereum JSON-RPC write methods writeMethodsMap := map[string]bool{ "eth_sendRawTransaction": true, "eth_sendTransaction": true, "eth_createAccessList": true, "eth_submitTransaction": true, "eth_submitWork": true, "eth_newFilter": true, "eth_newBlockFilter": true, "eth_newPendingTransactionFilter": true, } return writeMethodsMap[method] }This implementation uses a map for potentially better performance with a larger number of methods and includes explanatory comments.
util/reader.go (3)
8-10: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The function signature and initial buffer setup look good. The use of
bytes.Bufferwith a default capacity is an efficient approach.Consider adding a godoc comment to explain the purpose of the function and its parameters, especially the significance of
chunkSizeandexpectedSize.
11-16: LGTM! Consider enhancing readability.The buffer growth logic with a 50MB cap is a good security measure. The implementation is efficient, growing the buffer only when necessary.
Consider extracting the 50MB constant to a named variable at the package level for better readability and easier maintenance, e.g.:
const maxExpectedSize = 50 * 1024 * 1024 // 50MBThen use
maxExpectedSizein the condition on line 11.
18-29: LGTM! Consider handling partial reads explicitly.The main reading loop is well-implemented, using
io.CopyNefficiently and handling errors correctly.Consider explicitly handling the case where
n < chunkSizebut not EOF. This could occur if the reader returns fewer bytes than requested without an error. You might want to add a comment explaining that this case is implicitly handled by continuing the loop.erpc/erpc.go (1)
59-62: Overall impact: New functionality added without breaking changesThe addition of the
GetProjectsmethod enhances theERPCstruct's functionality by providing a way to retrieve all prepared projects. This change aligns with the PR objectives of incorporating new features from the upstream version. It's a non-breaking change that could be useful for operations requiring access to all projects.Consider how this new method might be used in the broader context of the application. If there are use cases where bulk operations on all projects are needed, this method will be particularly useful. However, be mindful of potential performance implications if the number of projects becomes very large.
Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
1-41: Consider adding a health check and verifying build argumentsThe Dockerfile structure and practices are generally good, including the use of multi-stage builds and Alpine for the final stage. To further improve it, consider:
- Adding a health check to the container for better orchestration support.
- Verifying that VERSION and COMMIT_SHA build arguments are always provided, perhaps with a default value or error if missing.
Example health check (adjust the command as needed for your application):
HEALTHCHECK CMD curl -f http://localhost:8080/health || exit 1For build args, you could add:
ARG VERSION ARG COMMIT_SHA RUN test -n "$VERSION" && test -n "$COMMIT_SHA"These additions would enhance the robustness and observability of your containerized application.
common/utils.go (2)
13-14: Add documentation for the newContextKeytype.While introducing a custom type for context keys is a good practice for type safety, it's important to provide documentation explaining its purpose and intended usage, especially for exported types.
Consider adding a comment above the type declaration, like this:
// ContextKey is a custom type for keys used in context values to ensure type safety. type ContextKey string
36-40: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for error handling.The modifications to
HexToInt64improve its robustness by using theNormalizeHexfunction, which handles both hexadecimal and decimal inputs. The error handling is also more comprehensive.Consider wrapping the error returned by
ParseIntto provide more context:i, err := strconv.ParseInt(normalizedHex, 0, 64) if err != nil { return 0, fmt.Errorf("failed to parse normalized hex '%s': %w", normalizedHex, err) } return i, nildocs/pages/operation/url.mdx (1)
74-86: LGTM: Valuable addition of Healthcheck documentationThe new Healthcheck section is a valuable addition to the documentation. It clearly explains the purpose and usage of the
/healthcheckendpoint, including a practical cURL example. The info callout provides important context about the current functionality.Consider adding a brief explanation of what a "non-200 response" might be in the info callout, to provide more clarity for users who may not be familiar with HTTP status codes.
auth/http.go (6)
23-23: LGTM: Improved token handling with util.Mem2Str.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor token conversion is a good improvement for memory efficiency and safety.Consider adding error handling for the case where the "token" argument is not present:
if tokenBytes := args.Peek("token"); tokenBytes != nil { ap.Secret.Value = util.Mem2Str(tokenBytes) } else { return nil, errors.New("token not provided") }
31-31: LGTM: Improved Authorization header handling with util.Mem2Str.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor converting the Authorization header value and decoded basic auth credentials is consistent with the improved memory handling approach.Consider adding error handling for the case where the Authorization header is empty after trimming:
ath := strings.TrimSpace(util.Mem2Str(ath)) if ath == "" { return nil, errors.New("empty Authorization header") }Also applies to: 40-40
59-59: LGTM: Improved JWT token handling with util.Mem2Str.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor converting the JWT token value is consistent with the improved memory handling approach.Consider adding error handling for the case where the "jwt" argument is not present:
if jwtBytes := args.Peek("jwt"); jwtBytes != nil { ap.Jwt.Token = util.Mem2Str(jwtBytes) } else { return nil, errors.New("JWT token not provided") }
64-65: LGTM: Improved SIWE payload handling with util.Mem2Str.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor converting both signature and message values in SIWE payload handling is consistent with the improved memory handling approach.Consider adding error handling for the case where either the signature or message is empty:
signature := util.Mem2Str(args.Peek("signature")) message := util.Mem2Str(args.Peek("message")) if signature == "" || message == "" { return nil, errors.New("SIWE signature or message not provided") } ap.Siwe = &SiwePayload{ Signature: signature, Message: normalizeSiweMessage(message), }Also applies to: 71-72
81-82: LGTM: Improved network payload handling with util.Mem2Str.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor converting X-Forwarded-For header values in network payload handling is consistent with the improved memory handling approach.Consider handling the case where the X-Forwarded-For header is empty:
xForwardedFor := util.Mem2Str(headers.Peek("X-Forwarded-For")) ap.Network = &NetworkPayload{ Address: xForwardedFor, ForwardProxies: strings.Split(xForwardedFor, ","), } if xForwardedFor == "" { ap.Network.Address = "unknown" ap.Network.ForwardProxies = []string{"unknown"} }
Line range hint
1-95: Overall assessment: Improved memory handling with consistent use of util.Mem2Str.The changes in this file consistently apply
util.Mem2Strfor string conversions, which aligns with the PR objectives and likely improves memory efficiency and safety. The overall structure and logic of the functions remain intact, maintaining existing functionality.To further enhance the robustness of the code, consider the following suggestions:
- Implement more comprehensive error handling for cases where expected values are missing or empty.
- Add unit tests to verify the behavior of the
NewPayloadFromHttpfunction with various input scenarios, including edge cases.- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose and benefits of using
util.Mem2Strfor future maintainers.docs/pages/deployment/railway.mdx (1)
33-49: Excellent addition of usage instructions for private network connections.This new section provides valuable guidance on using private network connections for eRPC, which can help users reduce costs and overhead. The code example is clear and well-formatted.
Consider rewording the introductory sentence for better clarity:
-To reduce cost and overhead use private network (`.railway.internal`) to connect to eRPC, from your backend services (such as indexers or mev bots): +To reduce cost and overhead, use the private network (`.railway.internal`) to connect to eRPC from your backend services (such as indexers or mev bots):🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~35-~35: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ge in your services To reduce cost and overhead use private network (`.railway.internal...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
erpc/erpc_test.go (2)
18-18: Approve logging change with a suggestion for conditional setup.The change to disable logging entirely is consistent with other test files and can help reduce noise in test output. However, consider implementing a conditional logging setup to facilitate debugging when needed.
Consider implementing a conditional logging setup:
func init() { if os.Getenv("ERPC_TEST_DEBUG") == "true" { zerolog.SetGlobalLevel(zerolog.DebugLevel) } else { zerolog.SetGlobalLevel(zerolog.Disabled) } }This allows enabling debug logging by setting an environment variable, which can be useful for troubleshooting test issues.
87-87: Approve JSON success response changes with a suggestion.The modifications from
json.RawMessageto byte slices for both RPC1 and RPC2 success responses are improvements, consistent with earlier changes.To enhance maintainability, consider defining these JSON responses as constants:
const ( rpc1SuccessResponse = `{"result":{"hash":"0x123456789","fromHost":"rpc1"}}` rpc2SuccessResponse = `{"result":{"hash":"0x123456789","fromHost":"rpc2"}}` ) // Then use these constants in the test: r.JSON([]byte(rpc1SuccessResponse)) // and JSON([]byte(rpc2SuccessResponse))This approach would centralize these response definitions, making them easier to update and maintain.
Also applies to: 96-96
README.md (1)
28-32: Excellent addition of case studies!The new "Case Studies" section is a valuable addition to the README. It provides concrete examples of eRPC's benefits, which can help attract potential users and demonstrate the project's real-world impact.
Consider adding a brief introductory sentence before the links to provide context, such as:
# Case Studies Explore how eRPC has improved performance and reduced costs for our users: [🚀 Moonwell: How eRPC slashed RPC calls by 67%](https://erpc.cloud/case-studies/moonwell)<br/> [🚀 Chronicle: How eRPC reduced RPC cost by 45%](https://erpc.cloud/case-studies/chronicle)This small addition would help frame the case studies and set expectations for readers.
docs/pages/operation/production.mdx (3)
7-7: Improve grammar and clarity in the Memory usage sectionThe content is informative, but there are a few grammatical issues to address:
- Replace "your" with "you" in "for example your might see"
- Correct the spelling of "occesional" to "occasional"
- Consider restructuring the sentence for better clarity
Here's a suggested revision:
- Biggest memory usage contributor in eRPC is size of responses of your requests. For example, for common requests such as `eth_getBlockByNumber` or `eth_getTransactionReceipt` the size (<1MB) will be relatively smaller than `debug_traceTransaction` (which could potentially be up to 50MB). When using eRPC in Kubernetes for example your might see occesional `OOMKilled` errors which is most often because of high RPS of large request/responses. + The biggest contributor to memory usage in eRPC is the size of responses to your requests. For example, common requests such as `eth_getBlockByNumber` or `eth_getTransactionReceipt` have relatively small responses (<1MB), while `debug_traceTransaction` responses could potentially be up to 50MB. When using eRPC in Kubernetes, you might see occasional `OOMKilled` errors, which are most often due to a high rate of large request/responses.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~7-~7: “your” (belonging to you) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...en using eRPC in Kubernetes for example your might see occesionalOOMKillederrors...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUR_YOU)
[uncategorized] ~7-~7: “of” seems less likely than “or” (‘either … or’).
Context: ...which is most often because of high RPS of large request/responses. In majority o...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_OF_OR)
9-9: Minor grammatical correction and clarity improvementThe content provides valuable guidance, but there's a small grammatical issue to address:
- In majority of use-cases eRPC uses around 256MB of memory (and 1vCPU). To find the ideal memory limit based on your use-case start with a high limit first (e.g. 16GB) and route your production traffic (either shadow or real) to see what is the usage based on your request patterns. + In the majority of use-cases, eRPC uses around 256MB of memory (and 1vCPU). To find the ideal memory limit based on your use-case, start with a high limit first (e.g., 16GB) and route your production traffic (either shadow or real) to observe the usage based on your request patterns.This revision adds the missing article, improves punctuation, and slightly rephrases the last part for better clarity.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~9-~9: An article may be missing.
Context: ...igh RPS of large request/responses. In majority of use-cases eRPC uses around 256MB of mem...(BUNCH_OF)
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... request/responses. In majority of use-cases eRPC uses around 256MB of memory (and 1...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
32-32: Approve note change and suggest minor correctionThe change in the note improves readability and punctuation. However, there's a minor issue to address:
- [Hedge policy](/config/failsafe#hedge-policy) is **highly-recommended** if you prefer "fast response as soon as possible". For example setting `500ms` as "delay" will make sure if upstream A did not respond under 500 milliseconds, simultaneously another request to upstream B will be fired, and eRPC will respond back as soon as any of them comes back with result faster. Note: since more requests are sent, it might incur higher costs to achieve the "fast response" goal. + [Hedge policy](/config/failsafe#hedge-policy) is **highly recommended** if you prefer "fast response as soon as possible". For example, setting `500ms` as "delay" will make sure if upstream A did not respond under 500 milliseconds, simultaneously another request to upstream B will be fired, and eRPC will respond back as soon as any of them comes back with result faster. Note: since more requests are sent, it might incur higher costs to achieve the "fast response" goal.This revision removes the redundant hyphen in "highly-recommended" and adds a comma after "For example" for better readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~32-~32: The hyphen in highly-recommended is redundant.
Context: ...cy](/config/failsafe#hedge-policy) is highly-recommended if you prefer "fast response as soon ...(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)
[typographical] ~32-~32: After the expression ‘for example’ a comma is usually used.
Context: ...fast response as soon as possible". For example setting500msas "delay" will make su...(COMMA_FOR_EXAMPLE)
vendors/quicknode.go (2)
54-56: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for consistencyThe refactoring of the error handling looks good. The new
NewErrEndpointRequestTooLargefunction with theEvmBlockRangeTooLargeargument provides more flexibility and specificity in error reporting.For consistency, consider updating the error message in the
common.JsonRpcErrorEvmLogsLargeRangeconstant (if it exists) to reflect the more generic "request too large" terminology used in the new error type. This would ensure that the error messages are aligned throughout the codebase.
Line range hint
39-124: Consider refactoring error handling for improved maintainabilityWhile the current implementation is functional, consider the following suggestions to improve maintainability and readability:
- Extract the error handling logic into a separate function or use a switch statement to reduce the complexity of the
GetVendorSpecificErrorIfAnymethod.- Consider using constants for error codes and creating a mapping between error codes and their corresponding error types. This would make it easier to maintain and update error handling in the future.
Here's a high-level example of how you might refactor this:
const ( ErrCodeMissingData = -32000 ErrCodeCapacityExceeded = -32009 // ... other error codes ... ) var errorCodeMap = map[int]func(code int, msg string, details map[string]interface{}) error{ ErrCodeMissingData: func(code int, msg string, details map[string]interface{}) error { return common.NewErrEndpointMissingData( common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionInternal(code, common.JsonRpcErrorMissingData, msg, nil, details), ) }, // ... other mappings ... } func (v *QuicknodeVendor) GetVendorSpecificErrorIfAny(resp *http.Response, jrr interface{}, details map[string]interface{}) error { // ... existing code ... if errHandler, ok := errorCodeMap[code]; ok { return errHandler(code, msg, details) } // Handle special cases that can't be mapped directly if code == -32602 && strings.Contains(msg, "eth_getLogs") && strings.Contains(msg, "limited") { return common.NewErrEndpointRequestTooLarge( common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionInternal(code, common.JsonRpcErrorEvmLogsLargeRange, msg, nil, details), common.EvmBlockRangeTooLarge, ) } // ... handle other special cases ... return nil }This approach would make the error handling more modular and easier to maintain.
.github/workflows/release.yml (2)
99-101: Minor improvement needed in shell scriptThe addition of a step to generate a short SHA is a good practice for more specific Docker image tagging. However, there's a minor shell scripting improvement that can be made.
To prevent potential word splitting issues, please modify the script as follows:
- run: echo "SHORT_SHA=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT + run: echo "SHORT_SHA=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"This change ensures that the
$GITHUB_OUTPUTvariable is properly quoted, preventing any potential issues with special characters or spaces.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
101-101: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
103-128: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Improved Docker image build and pushThe changes to the Docker image build and push steps are well-implemented:
- Splitting the steps based on the presence of a version tag improves flexibility.
- Using the short SHA in build arguments enhances traceability.
- Adding the 'latest' tag for versioned builds follows best practices.
These improvements align well with the PR objectives and enhance the workflow's functionality.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each build step to improve readability:
- name: Build and push Docker image from main if: github.event.inputs.version_tag == '' # This step builds and pushes the image when triggered by a push to main uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 ... - name: Build and push Docker image with tags if: github.event.inputs.version_tag != '' # This step builds and pushes the image when a version tag is provided uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 ...upstream/alchemy_http_json_rpc_client.go (1)
53-54: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of Scroll Sepolia and Scroll Mainnet networks to the
alchemyNetworkSubdomainsmap is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. These changes expand the supported networks for the Alchemy client without affecting existing functionality.Consider adding a brief comment above these new entries to explain their significance, e.g.:
// Scroll L2 networksThis would improve code readability and provide context for future maintainers.
erpc/projects_registry.go (1)
136-142: LGTM! Consider thread safety and immutability.The
GetAll()method is implemented correctly and efficiently. It provides a way to retrieve all registered projects, which aligns with the PR objective of incorporating new features.However, consider the following suggestions for improvement:
- If thread safety is a concern, consider adding synchronization to prevent potential race conditions during concurrent map access.
- To ensure immutability of the returned data, you might want to return a deep copy of the projects or document that the returned slice should not be modified by callers.
- If a consistent order of projects is important for your use case, consider sorting the slice before returning it.
Here's an example of how you could implement these suggestions:
import "sync" type ProjectsRegistry struct { // ... other fields ... mu sync.RWMutex preparedProjects map[string]*PreparedProject } func (r *ProjectsRegistry) GetAll() []*PreparedProject { r.mu.RLock() defer r.mu.RUnlock() projects := make([]*PreparedProject, 0, len(r.preparedProjects)) for _, project := range r.preparedProjects { // Assuming PreparedProject has a Clone method for deep copying projects = append(projects, project.Clone()) } // Optionally, sort the projects if order matters // sort.Slice(projects, func(i, j int) bool { // return projects[i].Config.Id < projects[j].Config.Id // }) return projects }This implementation adds thread safety, ensures immutability, and provides an option for consistent ordering.
docs/pages/config/rate-limiters.mdx (3)
64-70: Consider adding a brief explanation of rate limits.The introduction to the auto-tuner feature is clear and concise. To enhance clarity for readers who might be new to the concept, consider adding a brief explanation of what "rate limits" are and why they're important. This context will help readers better understand the value of the auto-tuner feature.
71-90: LGTM! Consider adding units for time-based parameters.The example configuration and explanations are clear and informative. The emphasis on setting
minBudgetto at least 1 is particularly valuable.To further enhance clarity, consider specifying the units for time-based parameters. For example, clarify if
adjustmentPeriod: "1m"refers to 1 minute.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~71-~71: A noun may be missing here.
Context: ...e auto-tuner is enabled by default when an upstream has any rate limit budget defined. Here...(DT_JJ_NO_NOUN)
91-106: LGTM! Consider adding guidance on adjusting default values.The explanation of the auto-tuner's operation and the presentation of default values are clear and informative. This provides a solid foundation for users to understand and implement the feature.
To further assist users, consider adding brief guidelines on when and how to adjust these default values. For example, you could explain scenarios where a user might want to increase or decrease the
errorRateThresholdor adjust theincreaseFactoranddecreaseFactor.docs/pages/operation/batch.mdx (1)
7-14: Excellent addition of the Callout component!The new Callout provides crucial information about the potential drawbacks of JSON-RPC batching for EVM. This addition significantly enhances the documentation by alerting users to important considerations before they implement batching.
Consider adding a link to the eRPC documentation or a brief explanation of how eRPC addresses these issues (if it does) to provide users with a complete picture of batching in the context of eRPC.
docs/pages/config/database.mdx (3)
96-101: Helpful Redis configuration example added.The new Redis configuration example is a valuable addition, providing practical guidance on setting up Redis with an eviction policy. This will be particularly useful for users implementing caching with Redis.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the
allkeys-lrupolicy for users who might not be familiar with Redis eviction policies. For example:maxmemory 2000mb -maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru +maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru # Evict least recently used keys first
Line range hint
1-101: Comprehensive improvements to database configuration documentation.The changes to this file significantly enhance the documentation's completeness and clarity. The addition of a comprehensive list of cacheable methods and the updated explanation of the re-org mechanism provide valuable information for users. These changes align well with the broader updates mentioned in the PR objectives and complement the enhancements made to other components.
For future consideration, it might be beneficial to include a brief section on performance implications of different caching strategies or driver choices. This could help users make more informed decisions based on their specific use cases and expected load.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~104-~104: Consider putting a comma before the abbreviation “i.e.”.
Context: ...o store cached data permanently without TTL i.e. forever. You d...(IE_COMMA)
Inconsistencies Found Between Documentation and Codebase
- Cacheable Methods: None of the methods listed in the documentation are implemented in the codebase.
- Database Drivers: Only the
memorydriver is implemented. Theredis,postgresql, anddynamodbdrivers mentioned in the documentation are missing.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-101: Documentation updates align with PR objectives, testing reminder.The changes to this documentation file effectively support the PR objective of rebasing to match v0.0.25. The updated content provides clear guidance on new features and configurations, which is crucial for users adopting the latest version.
As mentioned in the PR description, testing has not yet been conducted for these changes. Please ensure that comprehensive testing is performed to verify the accuracy of the documentation and the functionality of the described features, particularly the caching mechanisms and database configurations.
To assist with verification, you could run the following script to check for any inconsistencies between the documentation and the actual code:
This script will help ensure that the documented features are actually implemented in the code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency between documentation and code # Check if the cacheable methods listed in the documentation are actually implemented echo "Checking cacheable methods implementation:" rg -i "func.*\b($(sed -n '/| Method Name/,/^$/p' docs/pages/config/database.mdx | tail -n +3 | cut -d'|' -f2 | sed 's/ //g' | tr '\n' '|' | sed 's/|$//')\b)" erpc/ # Verify if the database drivers mentioned in the documentation are implemented echo "Checking database drivers implementation:" rg -i "driver.*\b(memory|redis|postgresql|dynamodb)\b" erpc/Length of output: 23117
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~104-~104: Consider putting a comma before the abbreviation “i.e.”.
Context: ...o store cached data permanently without TTL i.e. forever. You d...(IE_COMMA)
upstream/evm_state_poller.go (2)
Line range hint
318-327: Improved error handling and result processing infetchBlock.The changes enhance the method's efficiency and error reporting. The use of
PeekStringByPathis a good practice for JSON parsing.Consider wrapping the
HexToInt64call in a separate error check to provide more specific error information:numberStr, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath("number") if err != nil { return 0, &common.BaseError{ Code: "ErrEvmStatePoller", Message: "cannot get block number from block data", Details: map[string]interface{}{ "blockTag": blockTag, "result": jrr.Result, }, } } -return common.HexToInt64(numberStr) +blockNumber, err := common.HexToInt64(numberStr) +if err != nil { + return 0, &common.BaseError{ + Code: "ErrEvmStatePoller", + Message: "invalid block number format", + Details: map[string]interface{}{ + "blockTag": blockTag, + "numberStr": numberStr, + }, + } +} +return blockNumber, nil
356-365: Improved error handling and result processing infetchSyncingState.The changes simplify the logic, improve type safety, and enhance error reporting. The use of
common.SonicCfg.Unmarshalis consistent with the codebase's practices.Consider adding a check for
nilresult before unmarshalling to prevent potential panics:var syncing bool +if jrr.Result == nil { + return false, &common.BaseError{ + Code: "ErrEvmStatePoller", + Message: "syncing state result is nil", + } +} err = common.SonicCfg.Unmarshal(jrr.Result, &syncing) if err != nil { return false, &common.BaseError{ Code: "ErrEvmStatePoller", Message: "cannot get syncing state result type (must be boolean)", Details: map[string]interface{}{ "result": util.Mem2Str(jrr.Result), }, } }docs/pages/config/example.mdx (1)
77-77: Add explanation for the newmaxTimeoutoptionThe new
maxTimeoutoption has been added to the server configuration, but there's no explanation of its purpose or implications. To improve clarity:
- Add a brief explanation of what
maxTimeoutdoes and when it should be used.- Consider mentioning any default value if one exists.
- Update the "Minimal
erpc.yaml" section to include this option if it's considered essential.- If applicable, add a note in the "Roadmap" section about future enhancements related to this option.
Here's a suggested explanation to add after the new line:
maxTimeout: 30s # Maximum allowed duration for any request before it's terminatedupstream/registry.go (1)
464-466: New getter method for metricsTracker looks good.The
GetMetricsTrackermethod is a straightforward and correct implementation of a getter for themetricsTrackerfield. This addition enhances the API of theUpstreamsRegistrystruct, allowing external components to access the metrics tracker when needed.Consider the implications of exposing this internal field directly. Depending on your design goals, you might want to return a read-only interface or a copy of the tracker to maintain better encapsulation. If direct access is intentional and necessary, please ensure it's documented in the package documentation.
test/k6/run.js (1)
36-42: Remove commented-out code for a cleaner codebaseThe block of commented-out code may clutter the file and cause confusion. If this alternative payload is no longer needed, consider removing it or documenting its purpose.
vendors/drpc.go (1)
Line range hint
57-66: Consider using error codes alongside error message checks for robust error handling.Relying solely on error message strings can be fragile if messages change or are localized. If possible, consider using error codes in conjunction with message checks to make the error handling more reliable.
common/response.go (1)
269-283: Reset All Fields inRelease()to Prevent Memory LeaksThe
Release()method currently resetsbodyandjsonRpcResponse, but other fields likeerr,expectedSize, and metadata fields remain unchanged. To prevent potential memory leaks or unintended reuse, consider resetting all fields to their zero values.Apply this diff to reset additional fields:
func (r *NormalizedResponse) Release() { r.Lock() defer r.Unlock() // Close and reset body if r.body != nil { err := r.body.Close() if err != nil { log.Error().Err(err).Interface("response", r).Msg("failed to close response body") } r.body = nil } r.jsonRpcResponse.Store(nil) + r.err = nil + r.expectedSize = 0 + r.fromCache = false + r.attempts = 0 + r.retries = 0 + r.hedges = 0 + r.upstream = nil + r.evmBlockNumber.Store(0) }test/fake_server.go (2)
Line range hint
252-273: Safely perform type assertions to prevent runtime panicsIn the
findMatchingSamplemethod, type assertions are used without checking if they succeed:if len(sample.Request.Params.([]interface{})) == len(req.Params.([]interface{})) { // ... }If
Paramscannot be asserted to[]interface{}, the program will panic.Modify the code to safely handle type assertions:
+sampleParams, ok1 := sample.Request.Params.([]interface{}) +reqParams, ok2 := req.Params.([]interface{}) +if ok1 && ok2 { + if len(sampleParams) == len(reqParams) { + // Compare params one by one + for i, param := range sampleParams { + if param != reqParams[i] { + break + } + } + } +} else { + // Handle cases where Params are not slices + if sample.Request.Params == req.Params { + // Params match + } else { + // Params do not match + continue + } +}This change checks if the type assertions succeed and adds logic to handle cases where
Paramsare not slices.
165-171: Set the correct Content-Length headerIn
handleSingleRequest, theContent-Lengthheader is set based on the length of the JSON-encoded response:w.Header().Set("Content-Length", strconv.Itoa(len(buf.Bytes())))However, if the response contains multibyte characters,
len(buf.Bytes())may not accurately represent the byte length of the encoded response.Consider using
buf.Len()instead oflen(buf.Bytes()):w.Header().Set("Content-Length", strconv.Itoa(buf.Len()))This ensures that the content length is accurately set.
common/evm_block_ref.go (1)
50-52: Encapsulate block hash length as a constant for clarityThe length check
len(bns) == 66uses a magic number. Consider defining a constant (e.g.,BlockHashHexLength) to improve readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to define and use a constant:
+const BlockHashHexLength = 66 ... if strings.HasPrefix(bns, "0x") { - if len(bns) == 66 { + if len(bns) == BlockHashHexLength { return bns, 0, nil }upstream/failsafe.go (1)
150-150: Reminder: Implement the Prometheus MetricThere is a TODO comment to emit a custom Prometheus metric to track circuit breaker root causes. Implementing this will enhance observability and help diagnose issues more effectively.
Would you like assistance in implementing this metric or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
erpc/networks.go (1)
367-369: Simplify the nil check forevmStatePollersSince method receivers cannot be
nil, checkingn == nilis unnecessary. Simplify the condition to:Apply this diff to streamline the condition:
- if n == nil || n.evmStatePollers == nil || len(n.evmStatePollers) == 0 { + if n.evmStatePollers == nil || len(n.evmStatePollers) == 0 { return false, nil }common/json_rpc.go (1)
355-363: Simplify Slice Allocation inGetReaderMethodThe
GetReadermethod pre-calculatestotalReadersand manually manages indices, which can be simplified by appending to the slice without specifying its initial length.Simplify the code by declaring the slice without predefining its length:
- totalReaders := 3 - if r.Error != nil || len(r.errBytes) > 0 { - totalReaders += 2 - } - if r.Result != nil || len(r.Result) > 0 { - totalReaders += 2 - } - - readers := make([]io.Reader, totalReaders) - idx := 0 + var readers []io.Reader readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader([]byte(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":`))) readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader(r.idBytes)) if len(r.errBytes) > 0 { readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader([]byte(`,"error":`))) readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader(r.errBytes)) } else if r.Error != nil { r.errBytes, err = SonicCfg.Marshal(r.Error) if err != nil { return nil, err } readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader([]byte(`,"error":`))) readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader(r.errBytes)) } if len(r.Result) > 0 { readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader([]byte(`,"result":`))) readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader(r.Result)) } readers = append(readers, bytes.NewReader([]byte{'}'}))erpc/http_server.go (2)
Line range hint
152-156: Avoid exposing internal error details in client responsesSimilar to the previous issue, the error message in this per-request handler includes panic details and stack traces. Exposing such information can leak sensitive data. It's advisable to return a generic error message to the client and log the detailed information internally.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
if r := recover(); r != nil { - msg := fmt.Sprintf("unexpected server panic on per-request handler: %v -> %s", r, util.Mem2Str(debug.Stack())) + msg := "Internal server error" lg.Error().Msgf("unexpected server panic on per-request handler: %v -> %s", r, util.Mem2Str(debug.Stack())) fastCtx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) fastCtx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") fastCtx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, msg)) }
Line range hint
518-522: Avoid exposing internal error details when encoding failsIf an error occurs during encoding of the error response, the current implementation sends
err.Error()back to the client. This can reveal internal error messages or stack traces. Consider returning a generic error message instead.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
if err != nil { logger.Error().Err(err).Msgf("failed to encode error response") ctx.SetStatusCode(fasthttp.StatusInternalServerError) ctx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") - ctx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"%s"}}`, err.Error())) + ctx.SetBodyString(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-32603,"message":"Internal server error"}}`) } else { ctx.Response.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json") }upstream/upstream.go (3)
375-376: Address the TODO for per-network and per-method policiesThe TODO comment suggests extending the failsafe executor to handle per-network or per-method configurations. Implementing this would allow for more granular control over retry, circuit breaker, and integrity policies.
Would you like assistance in designing and implementing this feature?
439-439: Consider making ignore methods per-networkThe TODO comment indicates a plan to make the
IgnoreMethodsfunctionality per-network rather than global, which would be beneficial for upstreams supporting multiple networks.Do you need help in refactoring the configuration to support per-network
IgnoreMethods?
Line range hint
462-480: Handle errors when initializing rate limit auto-tunerIn
initRateLimitAutoTuner, the error returned byGetBudgetis currently ignored. To prevent silent failures, consider handling the error appropriately, such as logging it or exiting the initialization.Apply this diff to handle the error:
budget, err := u.rateLimitersRegistry.GetBudget(u.config.RateLimitBudget) -if err == nil { +if err != nil { + u.Logger.Error().Err(err).Msgf("failed to get rate limit budget: %s", u.config.RateLimitBudget) + return +} dur, err := time.ParseDuration(cfg.AdjustmentPeriod)erpc/http_server_test.go (2)
341-341: Uset.Loginstead offmt.Printlnfor test loggingUsing
t.Logprovides better integration with the testing framework and allows for more controlled test output.Apply this diff:
- fmt.Println(body) + t.Log(body)
584-584: Uset.Loginstead offmt.Printlnfor test loggingUsing
t.Logprovides better integration with the testing framework and keeps the test output organized.Apply this diff:
- fmt.Println(string(bodyBytes)) + t.Log(string(bodyBytes))common/errors.go (1)
701-702: Rename variableclienttouserErrorsfor clarityThe variable
clientcounts user-related errors and is later referenced as "user errors" in the summary. RenamingclienttouserErrorsorclientErrorsimproves readability and maintains consistent terminology.Also applies to: 731-734, 767-769
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (75)
- .github/workflows/prune.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (4 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .vscode/launch.json (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- auth/http.go (6 hunks)
- cmd/erpc/init_test.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/erpc/main.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/erpc/main_test.go (1 hunks)
- common/config.go (4 hunks)
- common/errors.go (14 hunks)
- common/evm.go (1 hunks)
- common/evm_block_ref.go (5 hunks)
- common/evm_block_ref_test.go (3 hunks)
- common/evm_json_rpc.go (2 hunks)
- common/init_test.go (1 hunks)
- common/json_rpc.go (4 hunks)
- common/request.go (12 hunks)
- common/response.go (6 hunks)
- common/sonic.go (1 hunks)
- common/utils.go (3 hunks)
- data/memory.go (0 hunks)
- data/mock_connector.go (2 hunks)
- data/value.go (0 hunks)
- docs/pages/config/database.mdx (2 hunks)
- docs/pages/config/example.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/pages/config/rate-limiters.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/pages/deployment/railway.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/pages/operation/batch.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/pages/operation/production.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/pages/operation/url.mdx (1 hunks)
- erpc/erpc.go (1 hunks)
- erpc/erpc_test.go (3 hunks)
- erpc/evm_json_rpc_cache.go (7 hunks)
- erpc/evm_json_rpc_cache_test.go (13 hunks)
- erpc/healthcheck.go (1 hunks)
- erpc/http_server.go (15 hunks)
- erpc/http_server_test.go (7 hunks)
- erpc/init.go (1 hunks)
- erpc/init_test.go (1 hunks)
- erpc/multiplexer.go (2 hunks)
- erpc/networks.go (11 hunks)
- erpc/networks_registry.go (1 hunks)
- erpc/networks_test.go (80 hunks)
- erpc/projects.go (3 hunks)
- erpc/projects_registry.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (2 hunks)
- test/cmd/main.go (1 hunks)
- test/fake_server.go (4 hunks)
- test/init_test.go (1 hunks)
- test/k6/run.js (3 hunks)
- test/samples/evm-json-rpc.json (1 hunks)
- upstream/alchemy_http_json_rpc_client.go (1 hunks)
- upstream/envio_http_json_rpc_client.go (1 hunks)
- upstream/evm_state_poller.go (3 hunks)
- upstream/failsafe.go (7 hunks)
- upstream/http_json_json_client_test.go (5 hunks)
- upstream/http_json_rpc_client.go (22 hunks)
- upstream/init_test.go (1 hunks)
- upstream/pimlico_http_json_rpc_client.go (1 hunks)
- upstream/registry.go (2 hunks)
- upstream/registry_test.go (0 hunks)
- upstream/request_test.go (1 hunks)
- upstream/thirdweb_http_json_rpc_client.go (1 hunks)
- upstream/upstream.go (4 hunks)
- util/fastmem.go (1 hunks)
- util/headers.go (2 hunks)
- util/json_rpc.go (1 hunks)
- util/reader.go (1 hunks)
- util/redact.go (1 hunks)
- vendors/drpc.go (2 hunks)
- vendors/quicknode.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- data/memory.go
- data/value.go
- upstream/registry_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- cmd/erpc/init_test.go
- common/init_test.go
- erpc/init_test.go
- test/init_test.go
- upstream/init_test.go
- upstream/request_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/prune.yml
25-25: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/release.yml
23-23: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
101-101: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:51: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/test.yml
6-6: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/pages/config/rate-limiters.mdx
[grammar] ~71-~71: A noun may be missing here.
Context: ...e auto-tuner is enabled by default when an upstream has any rate limit budget defined. Here...(DT_JJ_NO_NOUN)
docs/pages/deployment/railway.mdx
[uncategorized] ~35-~35: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ge in your services To reduce cost and overhead use private network (`.railway.internal...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
docs/pages/operation/production.mdx
[uncategorized] ~7-~7: “your” (belonging to you) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...en using eRPC in Kubernetes for example your might see occesionalOOMKillederrors...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUR_YOU)
[uncategorized] ~7-~7: “of” seems less likely than “or” (‘either … or’).
Context: ...which is most often because of high RPS of large request/responses. In majority o...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_OF_OR)
[grammar] ~9-~9: An article may be missing.
Context: ...igh RPS of large request/responses. In majority of use-cases eRPC uses around 256MB of mem...(BUNCH_OF)
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... request/responses. In majority of use-cases eRPC uses around 256MB of memory (and 1...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...sed on your request patterns. For more control you can configure Go's garbage collecti...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~30-~30: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Therefore’.
Context: ...might take up to 10 seconds to respond. Therefore a low timeout might ultimately always f...(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~32-~32: The hyphen in highly-recommended is redundant.
Context: ...cy](/config/failsafe#hedge-policy) is highly-recommended if you prefer "fast response as soon ...(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)
[typographical] ~32-~32: After the expression ‘for example’ a comma is usually used.
Context: ...fast response as soon as possible". For example setting500msas "delay" will make su...(COMMA_FOR_EXAMPLE)
[uncategorized] ~36-~36: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...wards cache database issues, so even if database is completely down it will not impact t...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (124)
.gitignore (1)
13-14: Appropriate additions to .gitignoreThe new entries in the .gitignore file are beneficial:
.semrel/: This likely ignores a directory related to semantic versioning or releases, which is good for excluding temporary or generated files.__debug*: This pattern ignores debug-related files and directories, which is a standard practice to keep the repository clean.These additions align well with the project's structure and the PR's objective of incorporating upstream changes.
util/json_rpc.go (3)
1-1: LGTM: Package declaration is appropriate.The
utilpackage name is suitable for utility functions likeRandomID.
3-6: LGTM: Imports are correct and well-organized.The necessary packages are imported, and the import order follows Go conventions.
1-11: Overall, the implementation is sound but with room for minor improvements.The
RandomIDfunction correctly implements a method to generate random JSON-RPC IDs within a 32-bit range. The code is well-structured and follows Go conventions. Consider the following suggestions for improvement:
- Add a security note to the function comment about the use of
math/rand.- Ensure that the random number generator is properly seeded elsewhere in the codebase.
These changes will enhance the documentation and potentially improve the randomness of the generated IDs.
util/headers.go (5)
5-6: LGTM: Import changes improve readability.The addition of an empty line between imports and moving "net/http" import improves code organization and readability.
11-11: LGTM: Loop iteration updated to match new signature.The change to iterate over
r.Headeris consistent with the new function signature and maintains the existing logic for header selection.
20-20: LGTM: Header value extraction updated correctly.The change to use
r.Header.Get(k)is appropriate for the new signature and provides a safer way to access header values.
Line range hint
9-24: Overall, the changes to ExtractUsefulHeaders are well-implemented and improve the function.The function now works directly with
*http.Response, which provides more flexibility and aligns with common Go practices. The implementation remains consistent in its logic for selecting and extracting headers. These changes should make the function more versatile and easier to use in various contexts within the application.However, it's crucial to ensure that all existing calls to this function throughout the codebase are updated to pass a
*http.Responseinstead of anhttp.Header. This may require changes in other files that weren't included in this review.To ensure a smooth transition, run the following script to identify any potential usage of the old function signature:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential usages of the old ExtractUsefulHeaders signature # Test: Search for function calls with http.Header argument. Expect: No results. rg -A 5 $'ExtractUsefulHeaders\s*\(\s*[^*]'
9-9: Approve signature change, but verify usage across codebase.The change from
http.Headerto*http.Responseprovides more flexibility and aligns with the PR objectives. However, ensure that all calls to this function are updated accordingly.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
erpc/multiplexer.go (1)
14-14: LGTM: Good addition for ensuring thread-safetyThe addition of
sync.Onceis a good practice to ensure that certain operations are performed only once, even in concurrent scenarios. This change aligns well with the existing thread-safety measures in theMultiplexerstruct..vscode/launch.json (1)
14-18: LGTM! Consider verifying compiler paths and CGo implications.The addition of environment variables for C and C++ compilers, along with enabling CGo, is appropriate for projects that interact with C/C++ code. This aligns well with the PR objective of incorporating upstream changes, which may include new dependencies or features requiring CGo.
However, please consider the following:
- Verify that the compiler paths ("/usr/bin/cc" and "/usr/bin/c++") are correct for all development environments. These paths might vary across different systems.
- Be aware that enabling CGo can affect build times and binary portability. Ensure this aligns with your project's requirements.
- Document the reason for these changes in the project's README or development setup guide to inform other contributors.
To ensure the compiler paths are correct, you can run the following script:
This script will help verify the compiler paths and CGo support in your development environment.
util/reader.go (2)
31-31: LGTM! Efficient return of buffer contents.The use of
buf.Bytes()is correct and efficient, returning a slice of the buffer's contents without unnecessary copying.
1-32: Great implementation! Consider adding unit tests.The
ReadAllfunction is well-implemented, providing an efficient and secure way to read data from anio.Readerin chunks. It aligns well with the PR objectives of incorporating new features and improving functionality.To ensure the robustness of this new function, consider adding comprehensive unit tests. These tests should cover various scenarios including:
- Reading small amounts of data (less than default buffer size)
- Reading large amounts of data (greater than default buffer size)
- Reading data with different chunk sizes
- Handling of EOF
- Handling of other potential errors
- Edge cases around the 50MB cap
Would you like assistance in generating these unit tests?
cmd/erpc/main.go (3)
9-9: LGTM: Import statement addition is appropriate.The addition of the
commonpackage import is necessary and aligns with the goal of centralizing version information.
Line range hint
1-38: Overall, the changes in this file are well-implemented and improve version management.The modifications to centralize version information in the
commonpackage enhance maintainability and align well with the PR objectives. The removal of hardcoded version variables and the use of constants from thecommonpackage is a good practice. These changes contribute to a more robust and maintainable codebase.
19-19: LGTM: Version logging update improves maintainability.The use of
common.ErpcVersionandcommon.ErpcCommitShacentralizes version information, which is a good practice. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.To ensure these constants are properly set during the build process, please run the following script:
This script will help verify that the version constants are properly defined and set during the build process.
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
6-6:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the
runs-onattribute changeThe
runs-onattribute has been changed fromubuntu-latesttolarge. This is not a standard GitHub-hosted runner label and may cause issues.If this is intended for a self-hosted runner, please ensure that:
- The
largelabel is correctly configured for your self-hosted runner.- The runner has the necessary resources and permissions to execute this job.
If this is not intended for a self-hosted runner, consider reverting to a standard GitHub-hosted runner label like
ubuntu-latest.To verify the available runner labels in your repository, you can run the following GitHub CLI command:
Please review and adjust the
runs-onattribute accordingly.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
6-6: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
.github/workflows/prune.yml (4)
1-10: LGTM: Well-structured workflow triggersThe workflow name is concise and descriptive. The combination of manual, scheduled, and push-based triggers provides good flexibility for running the pruning process.
11-15: LGTM: Appropriate job configurationThe job setup is simple and suitable for the pruning task. Using the latest Ubuntu ensures access to up-to-date tools.
16-21: LGTM: Secure login to GitHub Container RegistryThe login step uses the latest version of the docker/login-action and securely authenticates using the GITHUB_TOKEN, following best practices.
29-38: Consider enabling actual pruning after testingThe retention policy is currently set to dry-run mode, which is good for testing but won't perform actual pruning.
Once you've verified that the dry run produces the expected results, consider disabling dry-run mode to perform actual pruning. You can do this by setting
dry-run: falsein the workflow.Would you like assistance in implementing a conditional dry-run mode based on the triggering event (e.g., always dry-run for scheduled runs, but allow actual pruning for manual dispatch)?
erpc/erpc.go (2)
Line range hint
1-62: Final thoughts: Good addition, ready for mergeThe changes to
erpc/erpc.goare minimal, focused, and add useful functionality without introducing complexity. The newGetProjectsmethod is well-integrated with the existing code structure. With the suggested documentation addition, this change is ready for merge.
60-62: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The new
GetProjectsmethod is a good addition, providing a way to retrieve all projects. It's consistent with the existing code style and structure.Consider adding a documentation comment for this method to explain its purpose and return value. For example:
// GetProjects returns a slice of all prepared projects in the ERPC instance. func (e *ERPC) GetProjects() []*PreparedProject { return e.projectsRegistry.GetAll() }Let's verify the implementation of the
GetAll()method in theProjectsRegistry:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The
GetAll()method inProjectsRegistryis correctly implemented and functions as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of GetAll() method in ProjectsRegistry # Test: Search for the GetAll method in ProjectsRegistry rg -A 5 'func \(r \*ProjectsRegistry\) GetAll\(\)'Length of output: 436
Dockerfile (2)
20-20: Approved: Improved version information managementThe update to use
common.ErpcVersionandcommon.ErpcCommitShain the linker flags is a good practice. It centralizes version information, making it easier to maintain and update across the application. This change aligns well with the PR objective of incorporating upstream changes and improving code organization.
23-23: Approved: Consistent versioning across buildsThe identical update for the pprof-enabled build command ensures consistency in version information management across different build configurations. This change maintains parity between the standard and pprof-enabled versions, which is crucial for debugging and performance analysis.
Makefile (1)
45-45: Approved: Increased test count for improved reliability.The change from
-count 3to-count 5enhances the reliability of test results by running each test more times. This can help identify flaky tests and ensure the stability of the rebased changes.However, consider the trade-off between increased reliability and longer test execution time. If the tests were already stable with 3 runs, the additional runs might not provide significant value.
To assess the impact on test execution time, you can run the following script:
This script will help you evaluate whether the increased test count significantly affects the overall test execution time.
common/utils.go (2)
Line range hint
1-72: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives and improve code quality.The modifications in this file successfully incorporate new features and bug fixes, aligning with the PR's objective of rebasing to match v0.0.25. The changes enhance the robustness and flexibility of utility functions, particularly in handling hexadecimal and decimal inputs. The introduction of the
ContextKeytype also improves type safety.While the changes are generally positive, consider addressing the following points:
- Add documentation for the new
ContextKeytype.- Enhance error handling in
HexToInt64for more informative error messages.- Finalize the error handling strategy in
NormalizeHexas discussed.These improvements will further enhance the code quality and maintainability.
Line range hint
43-72: Approve changes and address the TODO comment.The modifications to
NormalizeHexsignificantly improve its flexibility and robustness. It now handles various input types and includes better error handling.Regarding the TODO comment on line 60, it's important to decide on the error handling strategy. Here's a suggestion:
if bn, ok := value.(string); ok { // ... (existing code) value, err := strconv.ParseUint(bn, 0, 64) if err == nil && value > 0 { return fmt.Sprintf("0x%x", value), nil } return "", fmt.Errorf("invalid string input: %s", bn) }This change would return an error for invalid string inputs, maintaining consistency with the function's error handling approach.
To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
This script will help identify all usages of
NormalizeHexand their surrounding context, allowing you to assess the impact of changing the error handling strategy.✅ Verification successful
Approve changes and mark the TODO as resolved.
The updates to
NormalizeHexenhance its error handling, and all usages in the codebase appropriately handle potential errors.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of NormalizeHex to ensure they handle potential errors rg -n 'NormalizeHex\(' | while read -r line; do file=$(echo "$line" | cut -d':' -f1) linenum=$(echo "$line" | cut -d':' -f2) context=$(rg -n 'NormalizeHex\(' "$file" -C 5) echo "File: $file" echo "Line: $linenum" echo "Context:" echo "$context" echo "------------------------" doneLength of output: 61436
test/cmd/main.go (3)
18-20: Verify the intention behind server configuration changesThe server configurations have been updated with new port numbers (9081-9083) and significantly reduced LimitedRate values. While these changes align with the PR objective of rebasing to match the upstream version, they may have a substantial impact on the behavior of the fake servers.
- The first server's LimitedRate has been reduced from 0.9 to 0.005
- The second server's LimitedRate has been reduced from 0.8 to 0.2
- The third server's LimitedRate has been reduced from 0.9 to 0.01
Please confirm that these changes are intentional and explain the reasoning behind the significant reductions in LimitedRate values. How might these changes affect the testing scenarios or the overall system behavior?
23-25: Clarify the purpose and impact of adding 102 new serversA new loop has been introduced to add 102 additional servers with ports ranging from 9084 to 9185. While this change aligns with the PR objective of rebasing to match the upstream version, it represents a significant increase in the number of fake servers being created.
- Could you explain the rationale behind adding such a large number of new servers?
- Have you considered the potential impact on system resources, especially in testing environments?
- Are there any specific test scenarios or use cases that necessitate this many servers?
Additionally, it might be beneficial to make the number of additional servers configurable, rather than hardcoding it. This would allow for more flexibility in different testing scenarios.
18-25: Consider performance optimizations and additional logging for new server configurationsThe changes introduce a significant increase in the number of fake servers, which could impact the performance and resource usage of the test environment. While the core structure of the main function remains unchanged, there are a few considerations:
Performance: With the addition of 102 new servers, the startup and shutdown times might increase substantially. Consider implementing parallel server startup and shutdown to mitigate this.
Logging: It might be beneficial to add more granular logging for the new servers, especially if any issues arise during their operation.
Error handling: With the increased number of servers, there's a higher chance of encountering errors. Consider implementing more robust error handling and recovery mechanisms.
Have these changes been tested in an environment similar to the intended deployment environment? Are there any performance benchmarks or metrics that can be shared to demonstrate the impact of these changes?
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions, such as parallel server startup or enhanced logging?
docs/pages/operation/url.mdx (2)
70-72: LGTM: Improved document structureThe elevation of the "Batch requests" section to a second-level heading (H2) improves the overall structure of the document, making it consistent with other main sections.
Line range hint
1-86: LGTM: Improved overall document structure and contentThe changes to this document have significantly improved its structure and content. The main sections are now consistently at the H2 level, creating a more balanced and easy-to-navigate layout. The flow of information is logical, starting with basic usage and progressing to more advanced topics like batch requests and the new healthcheck feature.
These improvements enhance the document's readability and make it a more comprehensive guide for users of eRPC.
auth/http.go (3)
9-9: LGTM: Import statement for util package added.The addition of the util package import is consistent with the subsequent usage of
util.Mem2Strthroughout the file, supporting improved memory handling.
28-28: LGTM: Improved X-ERPC-Secret-Token header handling.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor converting the X-ERPC-Secret-Token header value is consistent with the improved memory handling approach.
95-95: LGTM: Improved SIWE message normalization with util.Mem2Str.The use of
util.Mem2Strfor converting the decoded base64 string in thenormalizeSiweMessagefunction is consistent with the improved memory handling approach.docs/pages/deployment/railway.mdx (1)
55-55: Appropriate generalization of the example URL.The change from a specific deployment URL to a placeholder (
https://erpc-xxxxxxx.up.railway.app) is a good improvement. It makes the documentation more generic and applicable to all users, regardless of their specific deployment.go.mod (4)
8-8: LGTM: Bytedance/sonic version update.The update from v1.12.2 to v1.12.3 for github.com/bytedance/sonic is a minor version change, which typically includes bug fixes and small improvements. This aligns with the PR objective of rebasing to match v0.0.25 of the upstream project.
Please ensure that this update is compatible with your codebase and doesn't introduce any breaking changes. Consider running the project's test suite to verify compatibility.
30-30: LGTM: Bits-and-blooms/bitset version update.The update from v1.13.0 to v1.14.2 for github.com/bits-and-blooms/bitset is a minor version change, which typically includes new features, bug fixes, and improvements. This aligns with the PR objective of rebasing to match v0.0.25 of the upstream project.
Please ensure that this update is compatible with your codebase and doesn't introduce any breaking changes. Consider running the project's test suite to verify compatibility and to take advantage of any new features or improvements.
25-26: Clarify the need for the failsafe-go package replacement.The addition of a replace directive for github.com/failsafe-go/failsafe-go points to a fork (github.com/aramalipoor/failsafe-go) at a specific commit (v0.0.0-20241002125322-de01986d3951). While this may be necessary for your current needs, it's important to consider the following:
- Using a fork may prevent you from receiving updates from the original package.
- Using a specific commit instead of a released version could introduce incompatibilities or unexpected behavior.
- This approach might make it harder for other developers to understand and maintain the project.
Could you please clarify:
- Why is this replacement necessary?
- Is there a plan to contribute these changes back to the original repository?
- Have you considered alternatives, such as vendoring the package or creating a patch?
Additionally, please ensure that this change doesn't introduce any compatibility issues with the rest of the codebase.
Line range hint
1-74: Summary of go.mod changesThe changes in this file include:
- Updating github.com/bytedance/sonic from v1.12.2 to v1.12.3
- Updating github.com/bits-and-blooms/bitset from v1.13.0 to v1.14.2
- Adding a replace directive for github.com/failsafe-go/failsafe-go
The version updates are minor and align with the PR objective. However, the replace directive requires further clarification due to potential maintenance and compatibility concerns.
Please ensure that:
- The updated packages are compatible with your codebase.
- The project's test suite passes with these changes.
- The rationale for the replace directive is documented and understood by the team.
erpc/init.go (1)
72-72: Simplified httpServer initialization, but consider error handlingThe direct initialization of
httpServersimplifies the code and leverages type inference. This is a good change that reduces unnecessary variable declarations.However, there are two points to consider:
- Error handling: Ensure that
NewHttpServerdoesn't return an error that needs to be handled.- Variable scope: Verify that
httpServerisn't used outside this if block, as its scope has been reduced.To verify the
NewHttpServerfunction signature and usage, run the following script:✅ Verification successful
httpServer initialization is correct and scoped appropriately
After verification, the initialization of
httpServerdoes not require additional error handling asNewHttpServerdoes not return an error. Additionally, the scope ofhttpServeris appropriately limited to its usage context.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check NewHttpServer function signature and usage # Test 1: Check NewHttpServer function signature echo "Checking NewHttpServer function signature:" ast-grep --pattern 'func NewHttpServer($_) ($_) { $$$' # Test 2: Check for any other usages of httpServer variable echo "Checking for other usages of httpServer variable:" rg 'httpServer' --type goLength of output: 1110
erpc/erpc_test.go (2)
84-84: Approve JSON error response change.The modification from
json.RawMessageto a byte slice is an improvement. It's more efficient and consistent with changes in other test files.This change can lead to slightly better performance in tests by avoiding an extra parsing step.
Line range hint
1-146: Summary of changes in erpc_test.goThe modifications in this file primarily focus on:
- Disabling logging in tests
- Changing JSON response handling from
json.RawMessageto byte slicesThese changes align with modifications in other test files, improving consistency across the test suite. They may also lead to slight performance improvements in tests. While the changes are generally positive, consider the suggestions for conditional logging and response constant definitions to further enhance maintainability and debugging capabilities.
docs/pages/operation/production.mdx (3)
5-6: LGTM: New section on Memory usageThe addition of a "Memory usage" section is valuable for production guidelines. It provides crucial information for users managing eRPC in production environments.
11-21: LGTM: Excellent guidance on Go's garbage collection configurationThis section provides valuable information for advanced users on configuring Go's garbage collection. The code block is well-formatted, and the comments clearly explain the purpose of each environment variable. This addition will be particularly helpful for users facing OOM issues in Kubernetes environments.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...sed on your request patterns. For more control you can configure Go's garbage collecti...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
27-27: LGTM: Improved readability in Failsafe policies sectionThe change from "even when only 1 upstream" to "even when you only have 1 upstream" improves readability and directly addresses the reader. This minor improvement aligns with best practices in technical writing.
.github/workflows/release.yml (6)
13-15: LGTM: New trigger for main branch pushesAdding a trigger for pushes to the main branch is a good practice. It ensures that the release workflow runs automatically when changes are merged, which aligns well with continuous integration and deployment practices.
26-26: LGTM: Conditional steps for version taggingAdding conditions to the tagging steps based on the 'version_tag' input is a good improvement. This allows the workflow to be more flexible, running differently when triggered by a push to main versus when manually triggered with a version tag.
Also applies to: 33-33, 39-39
49-49: LGTM: Conditional steps for release processThe addition of conditions to the release steps based on the 'version_tag' input is consistent with the changes in the 'tag' job. This ensures that the release process only runs when explicitly triggered with a version tag, adding flexibility to the workflow.
Also applies to: 56-56, 62-62
78-78: LGTM: Flexible checkout for Docker image buildModifying the checkout step to use 'main' as the default when no version tag is provided is a good improvement. This change allows the workflow to build Docker images from the latest main branch when triggered by a push, while still supporting versioned builds when a tag is provided.
Line range hint
1-128: Overall assessment: Well-implemented improvements to the release workflowThe changes in this file significantly enhance the flexibility and functionality of the release workflow:
- The new trigger for pushes to the main branch supports continuous integration.
- Conditional steps allow for different behavior in automated and manual release scenarios.
- The Docker image build process is more robust, with improved traceability and tagging.
These improvements align well with the PR objectives of rebasing and incorporating upstream changes. The workflow now efficiently handles both automated builds from the main branch and manual versioned releases.
A few minor suggestions have been made to further improve the workflow:
- Verify the 'large' runner label to ensure it's a valid option.
- Add quotes in the shell script for generating the short SHA.
- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each Docker build step.
Overall, great work on enhancing this workflow!
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
23-23: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
23-23:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the 'large' runner label
The runner has been changed from 'ubuntu-latest' to 'large'. However, 'large' is not a standard GitHub-hosted runner label. This might cause the workflow to fail.
Please verify if 'large' is a custom self-hosted runner label in your organization. If not, consider changing it back to a standard GitHub-hosted runner like 'ubuntu-latest'.
To check available runners, you can run:
Replace {owner} and {repo} with your repository details.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
23-23: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
docs/pages/config/rate-limiters.mdx (1)
63-106: Excellent addition of auto-tuner documentation!The introduction of the auto-tuner feature is well-documented, providing clear explanations, useful examples, and default configurations. This addition significantly enhances the rate-limiting capabilities and user control over request management.
A few minor suggestions have been made to further improve clarity and user guidance, but overall, this is a valuable update to the documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~71-~71: A noun may be missing here.
Context: ...e auto-tuner is enabled by default when an upstream has any rate limit budget defined. Here...(DT_JJ_NO_NOUN)
erpc/projects.go (2)
91-91: Improved logging type specificityThe change from
Str("id", nq.Id())toInt64("id", nq.Id())enhances log consistency by using the correct type for theidfield. This improvement facilitates better log parsing and analysis.
Line range hint
1-11: Verify import changesThe AI summary mentioned the removal of the
mathpackage import, but this change is not visible in the provided code. Please verify if this change was made in a different commit or if the AI summary is incorrect.Run the following script to check for any recent changes to import statements:
If the
mathpackage import was indeed removed, please ensure that all references tomathfunctions have been properly addressed throughout the file.upstream/pimlico_http_json_rpc_client.go (1)
148-152: Improved chain ID extraction and error handlingThe changes to the chain ID extraction process are well-implemented:
- Using
jrr.PeekStringByPath()provides a more robust way to extract the chain ID from the JSON-RPC response.- The error handling is now more granular, allowing for specific error reporting if the string extraction fails.
- This change aligns with similar modifications in other client implementations, contributing to codebase consistency.
These improvements enhance the robustness of the
SupportsNetworkmethod while maintaining its overall logic and backwards compatibility.docs/pages/config/database.mdx (1)
82-85: Improved clarity on Redis usage and features.The updated description provides clearer guidance on when to use Redis for caching, emphasizing its eviction policy feature. This addition helps users better understand the advantages of using Redis in this context.
upstream/evm_state_poller.go (3)
32-32: Improved clarity insyncedfield documentation.The updated comment provides a more precise explanation of the
syncedfield's values, enhancing code readability and maintainability.
368-368: LGTM: Correct return statement infetchSyncingState.The return statement correctly provides the parsed syncing state.
Line range hint
1-368: Summary: Improvements align well with PR objectives.The changes in this file successfully incorporate upstream improvements, particularly in error handling and result processing. These modifications enhance code clarity, maintainability, and robustness, which aligns well with the PR's objective of rebasing to match v0.0.25.
To ensure these changes don't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: The changes in
upstream/evm_state_poller.gohave been verified and no regressions were introduced.
- No TODOs or FIXMEs found.
- Error handling patterns are consistent across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the changes in evm_state_poller.go don't introduce regressions # Test: Check for any TODOs or FIXMEs that might have been introduced rg -i "TODO|FIXME" upstream/evm_state_poller.go # Test: Ensure all error cases are properly handled ast-grep --pattern $'if err != nil { $$$ return $_, &common.BaseError{ $$$ } }' upstream/evm_state_poller.go # Test: Verify consistent use of error handling patterns rg -A 5 "common\.BaseError" upstream/evm_state_poller.goLength of output: 1770
docs/pages/config/example.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-100: Overall documentation structure and content look goodThe documentation provides a comprehensive overview of eRPC configuration options. The structure is clear, with separate sections for minimal and full configuration examples. The added
maxTimeoutoption enhances the server configuration capabilities.Consider periodically reviewing and updating this document to ensure it stays in sync with the latest features and best practices for eRPC configuration.
common/evm_block_ref_test.go (6)
182-200: LGTM: New test case for eth_call with blockHash object.This test case enhances coverage by checking the behavior of
eth_callwhen a block hash is provided as an object. The expected values are appropriate for this scenario.
201-219: LGTM: New test case for eth_call with blockNumber object.This test case further enhances coverage by checking the behavior of
eth_callwhen a block number is provided as an object. The expected values are consistent with the provided block number.
294-309: LGTM: New test case for eth_getProof with blockHash object.This test case enhances coverage by checking the behavior of
eth_getProofwhen a block hash is provided as an object. The expected values are appropriate for this scenario.
310-325: LGTM: New test case for eth_getProof with blockNumber object.This test case further enhances coverage by checking the behavior of
eth_getProofwhen a block number is provided as an object. The expected values are consistent with the provided block number.
346-346: LGTM: Updated Result field type in eth_getTransactionReceipt test case.The change from
json.RawMessageto[]bytefor theResultfield aligns with theJsonRpcResponsestruct definition and ensures type consistency.
Line range hint
182-325: Summary: Improved test coverage for block reference extraction.The changes in this file significantly enhance the test suite for the
ExtractBlockReferencefunction:
- New test cases for
eth_callandeth_getProofmethods with block identifiers (hash and number) as objects have been added.- The
eth_getTransactionReceipttest case has been updated for type consistency.These additions improve the robustness of the test suite by covering more scenarios, particularly for methods that can accept block identifiers as objects.
Also applies to: 346-346
erpc/evm_json_rpc_cache_test.go (8)
12-12: LGTM: Import added for util packageThe addition of the
utilpackage import is necessary and consistent with the changes made in the test cases.
68-68: LGTM: Updated response body handlingThe change to use
util.StringToReaderCloserfor the response body is consistent with the new approach for handling response data. The test logic remains intact.
81-81: LGTM: Consistent update to response body handlingThe change to use
util.StringToReaderCloserfor the response body is consistent with the previous modifications. The test logic and assertions remain unchanged.
97-97: LGTM: Consistent update to response body handlingThe change to use
util.StringToReaderCloserfor the response body maintains consistency with the previous modifications. The test logic and assertions remain intact.
112-112: LGTM: Consistent update to response body handlingThe change to use
util.StringToReaderCloserfor the response body maintains consistency with the previous modifications. The test logic and assertions remain unchanged.
150-150: LGTM: Consistent update to response body handling in test casesThe change to use
util.StringToReaderCloserfor the response body in the test cases maintains consistency with the previous modifications. The test logic, including the test cases and assertions, remains intact.
170-170: LGTM: Consistent updates across all test casesThe changes to use
util.StringToReaderCloserfor response bodies are consistent across all remaining test cases. The test logic and assertions remain unchanged, maintaining the integrity of the tests.Also applies to: 185-185, 199-199, 213-213, 227-227, 241-241, 255-255
Line range hint
1-300: Summary: Consistent improvements in response body handlingThe changes in this file demonstrate a systematic approach to improving response body handling in the test cases for
EvmJsonRpcCache. Key points:
- Consistent use of
util.StringToReaderCloserfor response bodies across all test cases.- No alterations to test logic or assertions, preserving the integrity of the tests.
- Addition of the
utilpackage import to support these changes.These modifications align with the broader changes in the codebase for JSON-RPC request and response handling, potentially improving memory management and streamlining the testing process.
upstream/registry.go (1)
361-366: Excellent optimization for trace-level logging!The conditional check for the logger's trace level before constructing and logging the sorted upstreams string is a great optimization. This change prevents unnecessary string concatenation when trace logging is disabled, potentially improving performance in production environments where trace logging is typically turned off.
upstream/http_json_json_client_test.go (2)
200-208: Improved response handling and verification.The changes in response handling are a significant improvement:
- It ensures that the entire response body is read and consumed.
- The content of the response is now explicitly verified against the expected result.
- This approach is more robust and can catch potential issues with response content that might have been missed before.
These modifications enhance the test's reliability and thoroughness.
Also applies to: 216-221
609-610: Broadened acceptable duration range for timeout test.The adjustment of the acceptable duration range from 745-755 milliseconds to 740-780 milliseconds is a positive change:
- It allows for slightly more variation in test execution time, which can help reduce test flakiness.
- The broader range still effectively verifies the timeout behavior.
- This change makes the test more robust across different environments where exact timing might vary.
This modification improves the test's reliability without compromising its effectiveness.
test/samples/evm-json-rpc.json (1)
1439-1451: Newdebug_traceTransactionmethod addedA new JSON-RPC request-response pair for the
debug_traceTransactionmethod has been added to the file. This addition enhances the test coverage for debugging capabilities. The structure is consistent with other entries in the file.However, there are a couple of points to consider:
- The response
"result": "bigfake:50000000"seems to be a placeholder or mock response. In a real scenario, we would expect a more detailed trace result.- The indentation of the new entry is inconsistent with the rest of the file, which might affect readability.
Consider adjusting the indentation to match the rest of the file:
- { - "request": { - "jsonrpc": "2.0", - "method": "debug_traceTransaction", - "params": [ - "0xe6c2decd68012e0245599ddf93c232bf92884758393a502852cbf2f393e3d99c" - ] - }, - "response": { - "jsonrpc": "2.0", - "result": "bigfake:50000000" - } - } +{ + "request": { + "jsonrpc": "2.0", + "method": "debug_traceTransaction", + "params": [ + "0xe6c2decd68012e0245599ddf93c232bf92884758393a502852cbf2f393e3d99c" + ] + }, + "response": { + "jsonrpc": "2.0", + "result": "bigfake:50000000" + } +}To ensure this transaction hash is consistent within the file, let's search for its occurrences:
This will help verify if the transaction hash is used consistently throughout the file.
✅ Verification successful
Transaction hash usage verified
The transaction hash
"0xe6c2decd68012e0245599ddf93c232bf92884758393a502852cbf2f393e3d99c"is used consistently across the file, including in the newly addeddebug_traceTransactionentry. This confirms that the addition maintains consistency within the test cases.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash grep -n "0xe6c2decd68012e0245599ddf93c232bf92884758393a502852cbf2f393e3d99c" test/samples/evm-json-rpc.jsonLength of output: 647
common/sonic.go (1)
48-57: Review security implications of Sonic configuration settingsThe
SonicCfgis set with options that disable certain validations and escaping mechanisms, such asEscapeHTML: false,NoValidateJSONMarshaler: true, andValidateString: false. Please verify that these settings do not introduce security vulnerabilities, especially if the JSON output includes user-provided input or is used in contexts susceptible to injection attacks.test/k6/run.js (1)
8-17: Change to 'constant-arrival-rate' executor is appropriateSwitching from
stagestoscenarioswith aconstant-arrival-rateexecutor effectively generates a steady request rate of 500 requests per second. This configuration is suitable for maintaining a consistent load during the test duration.vendors/drpc.go (1)
67-82: Verify that all possible error message variations are adequately handled.Ensure that the string checks for error messages cover all relevant variations that might be returned by the API, to prevent any unhandled exceptions.
Would you like assistance in creating a comprehensive list of error messages and handling them accordingly?
common/evm_json_rpc.go (2)
8-10: Ensure proper error handling after removing error return value.The function
NormalizeEvmHttpJsonRpcno longer returns an error. Confirm that all internal errors are managed appropriately within the function to prevent unintended behavior.
62-76: Verify parameter indexing for theeth_getStorageAtmethod.Ensure that accessing
jrq.Params[2]aligns with the expected parameter structure foreth_getStorageAt. Confirm that parameters are correctly indexed and normalized according to the method's specification.common/response.go (1)
218-219:⚠️ Potential issueRemove Unmatched
RUnlock()CallIn the
EvmBlockNumber()method, there is anr.RUnlock()call without a precedingr.RLock(). This can cause a runtime error due to unlocking an unlocked mutex. Ensure that every unlock operation is matched with a corresponding lock.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary unlock:
func (r *NormalizedResponse) EvmBlockNumber() (int64, error) { if r == nil { return 0, nil } if n := r.evmBlockNumber.Load(); n != 0 { return n, nil } - r.RUnlock() if r.request == nil { return 0, nil } // Remaining code... }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
common/request.go (2)
253-253: EnsureSonicCfgis thread-safeAt line 253,
SonicCfg.Unmarshalis used for unmarshalling JSON data. Confirm thatSonicCfgis configured for thread-safe operations to prevent potential data races.
116-116: Changing the return type ofId()may break existing codeThe method
Id()has changed its return type fromstringtoint64. This is a breaking change that could affect any code that relies onId()returning astring.Please ensure that all usages of
Id()are updated accordingly throughout the codebase.Run the following script to find all occurrences of
Id()and verify their usage:erpc/evm_json_rpc_cache.go (7)
11-11: Importing theutilpackage is appropriateThe addition of
"github.com/erpc/erpc/util"is necessary for utilizing the new utility functions such asMem2StrandStr2Memintroduced in this file.
65-67: Appropriate use of read lock onrpcReqAdding
rpcReq.RLock()anddefer rpcReq.RUnlock()ensures thread-safe access torpcReqwithin theGetmethod. This is good practice ifrpcReqis subject to concurrent reads.
104-108: Efficient handling of JSON-RPC responseUsing
util.Str2Mem(resultString)optimizes memory usage by avoiding unnecessary allocations when settingjrr.Result. Also, setting theIDwithjrr.SetID(rpcReq.ID)ensures that the response ID matches the request ID, which is essential for correct client-server communication. Error handling is properly implemented.
130-130: Consistent renaming toshouldCacheResponseRenaming the function to
shouldCacheResponseimproves clarity by explicitly indicating that it determines whether the response should be cached. Ensure that all references to this function are updated throughout the codebase to prevent any inconsistencies.
192-192: Proper conversion before caching the responseConverting
rpcResp.Resultto a string usingutil.Mem2Strbefore caching ensures that the data is stored in a consistent format. This is important for reliable retrieval and use of cached responses.
Line range hint
195-249: Improved function naming and consistency inshouldCacheResponseThe renaming of
shouldCachetoshouldCacheResponseenhances readability and clarity of the codebase, making it explicit that the function determines caching based on the response. The logic within the function remains consistent and aligns with the caching strategy.
268-268: Simplification ofshouldCacheForBlockfunctionThe
shouldCacheForBlockfunction now directly returns the result ofc.network.EvmIsBlockFinalized(blockNumber), simplifying the code by removing unnecessary error handling. Ensure that any potential errors fromEvmIsBlockFinalizedare appropriately handled by the calling functions to prevent unintended behavior.To verify error handling at call sites, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Error Handling Verified in
shouldCacheForBlockCallersAll callers of
shouldCacheForBlockproperly handle potential errors, ensuring no unintended behavior arises from the removal of error handling within the function.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that callers of `shouldCacheForBlock` handle errors appropriately. # Find all calls to `shouldCacheForBlock` and display their context. rg -A 3 -B 1 'shouldCacheForBlock\('Length of output: 823
common/evm_block_ref.go (4)
90-92: Reuse the block hash length constant for consistencyTo maintain consistency, use the previously defined
BlockHashHexLengthconstant here as well.
115-117: Use the block hash length constant instead of magic numberReplace
66withBlockHashHexLengthto enhance code clarity and prevent potential errors if the block hash length changes.
187-193: Replace magic number with block hash length constantFor consistency and maintainability, use the
BlockHashHexLengthconstant instead of66when checking block hash lengths.
266-267: Ensure block reference derivation is reliableWhen
blockRefis empty butblockNumberis available, the code assignsblockRef = strconv.FormatInt(blockNumber, 10). Confirm that representing the block reference as a decimal string of the block number aligns with the expected format elsewhere in the system.Run the following script to identify usages of
blockRefand ensure they're compatible with decimal block numbers:upstream/failsafe.go (4)
Line range hint
69-74: Approved: Addition of Hedge PolicyThe inclusion of the hedge policy in the
CreateFailSafePoliciesfunction is correctly implemented. The error handling and policy appending are properly handled.
Line range hint
190-217: Approved: Implementation of Hedge Policy FunctionThe
createHedgePolicyfunction is well-implemented, including proper parsing of configuration values and error handling. The use ofbuilder.OnHedgeprovides valuable control over hedging behavior.
269-271: Approved: Correct Handling of Client ErrorsThe retry policy correctly avoids retrying on client-side errors by using
common.IsClientError(err), ensuring that invalid requests are not retried unnecessarily.
354-361: Approved: Preventing Retries for Write MethodsThe addition properly prevents retries for write methods, which is important to maintain idempotency and avoid unintended side effects on state-changing operations.
common/json_rpc.go (3)
294-307: Consider Mutex Lock Ordering to Prevent DeadlocksIn
MarshalZerologObject, multiple mutexes (resultMu,errMu) are locked separately. To prevent potential deadlocks, ensure consistent lock ordering across methods that use these mutexes.Review the codebase to confirm that all methods acquiring these mutexes do so in the same order.
590-609: Consistent Use of Error Codes inTranslateToJsonRpcExceptionEnsure that all internal errors are translated to appropriate JSON-RPC error codes. Review the mapping of internal error codes to JSON-RPC error responses for completeness.
Verify that all possible internal error codes are correctly mapped, and consider adding unit tests to cover these cases.
477-484:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect Method Receiver in
MarshalZerologObjectThe method
MarshalZerologObjectis defined with a receiver of*JsonRpcResponsebut accesses fields (Method,Params,ID) that belong toJsonRpcRequest. This suggests that the receiver should be*JsonRpcRequestinstead.Apply this diff to correct the receiver type:
-func (r *JsonRpcResponse) MarshalZerologObject(e *zerolog.Event) { +func (r *JsonRpcRequest) MarshalZerologObject(e *zerolog.Event) { if r == nil { return } - r.RLock() - defer r.RUnlock() + r.RLock() + defer r.RUnlock() e.Str("method", r.Method). Interface("params", r.Params). Interface("id", r.ID) }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
erpc/http_server.go (2)
85-85:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure that disabling HTML escaping does not introduce XSS vulnerabilities
Disabling HTML escaping with
encoder.SetEscapeHTML(false)can pose security risks if untrusted data is included in the response, potentially leading to XSS attacks. Please verify that all data written to the response is properly sanitized and does not include untrusted input.
483-485:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure error 'data' field does not expose sensitive information
Including
jre.Details["data"]in the error response may unintentionally expose sensitive information to the client. Please verify that the data included is safe to share and does not contain confidential or internal details.common/config.go (4)
380-383: Good addition: Prevent nil pointer dereferences inNetworkId().Adding checks for
c.Architectureandc.Evmin theNetworkId()method enhances robustness by ensuring that nil pointers are not dereferenced.
448-452: Verify the increased circuit breaker failure thresholds.The
FailureThresholdCounthas been increased to800with a capacity of1000. This change significantly alters when the circuit breaker will trip. Please ensure these new thresholds align with the desired failure tolerance and system resilience.You can verify the impact of these thresholds by reviewing their usage and testing under simulated failure conditions.
480-495: Approved: AddedNetworkDefaultFailsafeConfigfor default failsafe settings.Introducing
NetworkDefaultFailsafeConfigcentralizes the default failsafe configurations for networks, improving maintainability and consistency across the application.
497-516: Good practice: Added validation inNetworkConfig.UnmarshalYAML().The validation ensures that
Architectureis specified and thatEvmconfiguration is present whenArchitectureis"evm". This prevents misconfigurations and potential runtime errors.upstream/upstream.go (4)
146-146: Improved error message for clarityThe error message has been updated to "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request," which provides clearer communication and maintains consistent terminology.
290-294: Ensure sensitive data is not loggedIncluding
respin the debug log at trace level may expose sensitive information. Verify that logging the response does not compromise any sensitive data.
395-400: Improved error handling inEvmGetChainIdThe changes enhance clarity by introducing a dedicated
chainIdvariable and maintain consistent error handling after unmarshalling the result.
Line range hint
506-516: Efficient caching of method support resultsThe caching logic in
shouldHandleMethodimproves performance by storing method support results. This change ensures that method checks are efficient and thread-safe using proper synchronization.erpc/http_server_test.go (2)
775-841:⚠️ Potential issueRemove duplicate definitions of
createServerTestFixturesfunctionThe
createServerTestFixturesfunction is defined multiple times in the file. This will cause a compilation error and can lead to confusion. Please remove the duplicate definitions, keeping only one definition.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- // Duplicate definition of createServerTestFixtures function starting here - func createServerTestFixtures(cfg *common.Config, t *testing.T) ( - func(body string, headers map[string]string, queryParams map[string]string) (int, string), - string, - ) { - // Function body... - } - // Duplicate definition ends hereLikely invalid or redundant comment.
616-723:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure unique test names and avoid code duplication
The
TestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreamsfunction appears to be duplicated in the code. Duplicate test functions with the same name will cause compilation errors and can lead to confusion during test execution. Please remove the duplicate and ensure each test function has a unique name.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- // Remove duplicate TestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreams function - func TestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreams(t *testing.T) { - // Function body... - }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
common/errors.go (6)
98-98: EnsureSonicCfgis properly initializedThe use of
SonicCfg.Marshalinstead ofsonic.Marshalrequires thatSonicCfgis correctly configured before serialization. Verify thatSonicCfgis properly initialized to prevent potential runtime errors during marshaling.
159-159: Consistent use ofSonicCfg.Marshalfor error serializationThe replacement of
sonic.MarshalwithSonicCfg.Marshalensures consistent serialization using a custom configuration. This enhances control over the marshaling process.Also applies to: 167-167, 175-175, 187-187
976-984: Addition ofcauseparameter enhances error contextThe
NewErrUpstreamHedgeCancelledfunction now includes acauseparameter, providing better context for the cancellation reason. This improves error tracing and debugging.
1349-1362: Definition ofErrEndpointTransportFailureis appropriateThe new
ErrEndpointTransportFailureerror type correctly represents failures in sending requests to remote endpoints, enhancing error categorization.
1452-1474: Introduction ofErrEndpointRequestTooLargeimproves error specificityAdding
ErrEndpointRequestTooLargeand theTooLargeComplainttype provides more detailed feedback on large request errors, aiding in precise error handling.
1571-1571: IncludingDatafield aligns with JSON-RPC error standardsAdding the
Datafield toErrJsonRpcExceptionExternalallows for additional context in error responses, adhering to the JSON-RPC specification.
| func RandomID() int64 { | ||
| return int64(rand.Intn(math.MaxInt32)) // #nosec G404 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issue Found: Missing Random Seed Initialization
No rand.Seed() calls found in the codebase. To ensure proper randomness, consider initializing the random number generator, for example, in an init() function or at the program start.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Implementation is correct, but consider random seed initialization.
The function correctly generates a random number within the 32-bit range as described. The use of math/rand is acknowledged with the #nosec G404 comment.
To ensure proper randomness, verify that the random number generator is seeded elsewhere in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for rand.Seed() calls in the codebase
# Test: Search for rand.Seed() calls
rg 'rand\.Seed\('
# If no results, it might be worth adding a seed initialization
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo "No rand.Seed() calls found. Consider adding one in an init() function or at program start."
fi
Length of output: 228
| args: -exclude-dir=test -tests=false ./... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the Codecov step modification
The Upload coverage reports to Codecov step has been modified to use args instead of token. This change appears to be incorrect and may prevent proper coverage reporting.
The current modification:
- Removes the necessary Codecov token.
- Applies arguments that are likely intended for the Gosec Security Scanner, not Codecov.
Please consider reverting this change and using the correct Codecov configuration:
- name: Upload coverage reports to Codecov
uses: codecov/[email protected]
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}If you need to pass additional arguments to Codecov, please refer to the Codecov GitHub Action documentation for the correct syntax and available options.
| @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import ( | |||
| func RedactEndpoint(endpoint string) string { | |||
| // Calculate hash of the entire original endpoint | |||
| hasher := sha256.New() | |||
| hasher.Write([]byte(endpoint)) | |||
| hasher.Write(Str2Mem(endpoint)) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add tests for Str2Mem to ensure its safety and correctness
The Str2Mem function uses unsafe operations and currently lacks tests. To prevent potential memory safety issues and ensure it handles all input cases correctly, please:
- Implement comprehensive unit tests for
Str2Mem, covering edge cases such as empty strings and Unicode characters. - Review the use of
unsafe.Pointerto ensure memory safety is not compromised.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the safety and correctness of Str2Mem
The change from []byte(endpoint) to Str2Mem(endpoint) likely aims to improve performance. However, please ensure that:
Str2Memcorrectly handles all possible input strings, including edge cases like empty strings and Unicode characters.- The use of unsafe operations (if any) in
Str2Memdoesn't introduce memory safety issues.
Consider adding a comment explaining why Str2Mem is used here instead of the standard conversion.
To verify the correctness of this change, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of Str2Mem and its usage
# Test 1: Find the implementation of Str2Mem
echo "Str2Mem implementation:"
rg -p "func Str2Mem" -A 10
# Test 2: Check for any unsafe operations in Str2Mem
echo "\nChecking for unsafe operations:"
rg "unsafe\." -A 5 -B 5
# Test 3: Look for existing tests of Str2Mem
echo "\nExisting tests for Str2Mem:"
rg "func Test.*Str2Mem" -A 10
# Test 4: Check for other usages of Str2Mem in the codebase
echo "\nOther usages of Str2Mem:"
rg "Str2Mem\(" -g '!*test*'
Length of output: 3254
| - name: Fetch multi-platform package version SHAs | ||
| id: multi-arch-digests | ||
| run: | | ||
| erpc=$(docker manifest inspect ghcr.io/erpc/erpc | jq -r '.manifests.[] | .digest' | paste -s -d ' ' -) | ||
| echo "multi-arch-digests=$erpc" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix potential word splitting in SHA fetching step
The current shell script may be prone to word splitting issues. Consider using double quotes to prevent this.
Apply this diff to fix the potential word splitting issue:
- erpc=$(docker manifest inspect ghcr.io/erpc/erpc | jq -r '.manifests.[] | .digest' | paste -s -d ' ' -)
- echo "multi-arch-digests=$erpc" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+ erpc=$(docker manifest inspect ghcr.io/erpc/erpc | jq -r '.manifests.[] | .digest' | paste -s -d ' ' -)
+ echo "multi-arch-digests=\"$erpc\"" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Fetch multi-platform package version SHAs | |
| id: multi-arch-digests | |
| run: | | |
| erpc=$(docker manifest inspect ghcr.io/erpc/erpc | jq -r '.manifests.[] | .digest' | paste -s -d ' ' -) | |
| echo "multi-arch-digests=$erpc" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT | |
| - name: Fetch multi-platform package version SHAs | |
| id: multi-arch-digests | |
| run: | | |
| erpc=$(docker manifest inspect ghcr.io/erpc/erpc | jq -r '.manifests.[] | .digest' | paste -s -d ' ' -) | |
| echo "multi-arch-digests=\"$erpc\"" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT |
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
25-25: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
| cids, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return false, err | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| cidh, err := common.NormalizeHex(cids) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential Misuse of PeekStringByPath() Without Specifying a Path
The PeekStringByPath() method is called without any arguments in upstream/envio_http_json_rpc_client.go. This usage might not correctly extract the intended chain ID from the JSON-RPC response.
-
Recommendation: Specify the appropriate path when calling
PeekStringByPath()to ensure accurate extraction. For example:cids, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath("result", "chainId") if err != nil { return false, fmt.Errorf("failed to extract chain ID: %w", err) }
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the usage of PeekStringByPath() and consider improving error handling
The changes in extracting the chain ID from the JSON-RPC response raise a few concerns:
-
The
PeekStringByPath()method is called without any path argument. This might not be the intended usage, as typically you'd need to specify a path to extract a specific field from the JSON response. -
The error handling for
PeekStringByPath()might hide underlying issues if it fails. Consider logging the error or passing it up the call stack for better debugging.
To ensure the correctness of this change, please run the following verification:
Consider refactoring the chain ID extraction as follows:
cids, err := jrr.PeekStringByPath("result")
if err != nil {
return false, fmt.Errorf("failed to extract chain ID: %w", err)
}This assumes that the chain ID is in the "result" field of the JSON-RPC response. Adjust the path as necessary based on the actual response structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of PeekStringByPath in the codebase
# Test: Search for other usages of PeekStringByPath to compare
rg -A 5 'PeekStringByPath'
# Test: Check the JsonRpcResponse type definition
rg -A 10 'type JsonRpcResponse'
Length of output: 8355
| func (e *ErrUpstreamMethodIgnored) ErrorStatusCode() int { | ||
| return http.StatusUnsupportedMediaType | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Evaluate the use of HTTP status code 415
The ErrorStatusCode() method returns http.StatusUnsupportedMediaType (415). Since ErrUpstreamMethodIgnored pertains to ignored methods, consider using http.StatusMethodNotAllowed (405) to more accurately reflect the nature of the error.
|
|
||
| func IsClientError(err error) bool { | ||
| return err != nil && (HasErrorCode(err, ErrCodeEndpointClientSideException) || | ||
| HasErrorCode(err, ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review error codes in IsClientError function
The IsClientError function checks for ErrCodeEndpointClientSideException and ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal. Consider including other client-side error codes, such as ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnresolvableMethod, to ensure comprehensive client error detection.
| if _, ok := cause.(*BaseError); ok { | ||
| return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ | ||
| BaseError{ | ||
| Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, | ||
| Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", | ||
| Cause: cause, | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| } else if cause != nil { | ||
| return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ | ||
| BaseError{ | ||
| Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, | ||
| Message: fmt.Sprintf("%s", cause), | ||
| }, | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure consistent error messages in NewErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal
When cause is not nil, the error message is set to the cause's string representation. This may lead to inconsistent messages. Consider setting a standard error message and assigning cause to the Cause field for consistency.
Apply this diff to standardize the error message:
} else if cause != nil {
return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{
BaseError{
Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal,
- Message: fmt.Sprintf("%s", cause),
+ Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request",
+ Cause: cause,
},
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if _, ok := cause.(*BaseError); ok { | |
| return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ | |
| BaseError{ | |
| Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, | |
| Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", | |
| Cause: cause, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| } else if cause != nil { | |
| return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ | |
| BaseError{ | |
| Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, | |
| Message: fmt.Sprintf("%s", cause), | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if _, ok := cause.(*BaseError); ok { | |
| return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ | |
| BaseError{ | |
| Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, | |
| Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", | |
| Cause: cause, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| } else if cause != nil { | |
| return &ErrJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal{ | |
| BaseError{ | |
| Code: ErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshal, | |
| Message: "failed to unmarshal json-rpc request", | |
| Cause: cause, | |
| }, | |
| } | |
| } |
| @@ -218,13 +221,13 @@ func TestNetwork_Forward(t *testing.T) { | |||
| t.Run("ForwardUpstreamRetryIntermittentFailuresWithoutSuccessAndNoErrCode", func(t *testing.T) { | |||
| defer gock.Off() | |||
|
|
|||
| var requestBytes = json.RawMessage(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_traceTransaction","params":["0x1273c18",false]}`) | |||
| var requestBytes = []byte(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_traceTransaction","params":["0x1273c18",false]}`) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor repeated requestBytes declarations into helper functions
The requestBytes variable is declared multiple times across different tests with similar or identical JSON payloads. To improve code maintainability and reduce duplication, consider refactoring these repeated declarations into helper functions or constants.
You can define a helper function or constant for the common request payloads, like so:
func newTraceTransactionRequestBytes() []byte {
return []byte(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_traceTransaction","params":["0x1273c18",false]}`)
}Then, in your tests, use:
var requestBytes = newTraceTransactionRequestBytes()Also applies to: 328-328, 432-432, 576-576, 724-724, 911-911, 1286-1286, 1485-1485
| Delay(3 * time.Second). | ||
| BodyString(`{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":4,"result":"0x1"}`) | ||
|
|
||
| totalRequests := 100 | ||
| totalRequests := int64(100) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure mocked responses use dynamic IDs to match requests
In the JsonRpcIDConsistencyOnConcurrentRequests test, the mocked response currently returns a hardcoded ID of 4. Since each request has a unique ID, the mock should return the corresponding request ID to accurately test JSON-RPC ID consistency.
Consider modifying the mock to use ReplyFunc to dynamically set the response ID based on the incoming request's ID. This ensures that the response ID in the response matches the ID of each request, validating the consistency in your test.
…-to-match-v0.0.25
OBlackmon3
force-pushed
the
oblackmon3/rebase-polymer-develop-to-match-v0.0.25
branch
from
572f721 to
d5c66a0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
test/fake_server.go (1)
Line range hint
175-235: Enhanced request processing and error handlingThe updates to
processSingleRequestsignificantly improve the robustness of request processing. The method now correctly handles notifications (requests without an ID) as per the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification, and the simulation of different scenarios (rate limiting, failure) is more accurate.Consider additional error handling for invalid params
While the method handles various scenarios well, it might be beneficial to add explicit handling for invalid params.
Consider adding a check for invalid params:
if req.Jsonrpc != "2.0" || req.Method == "" { // ... existing error handling ... } +if req.Params == nil { + return &JSONRPCResponse{ + Jsonrpc: "2.0", + Error: map[string]interface{}{"code": -32602, "message": "Invalid params"}, + ID: req.ID, + } +}This addition would provide more specific error feedback for requests with missing or invalid params.
erpc/networks.go (1)
25-26: Consider documenting the purpose ofevmStatePollersThe new
evmStatePollersfield has been added to theNetworkstruct. It would be helpful to add a comment explaining its purpose and how it's used within the network operations.common/json_rpc.go (6)
60-81: EfficientNewJsonRpcResponseFromBytesfunction addedThe new
NewJsonRpcResponseFromBytesfunction is a valuable addition, allowing for efficient creation ofJsonRpcResponseobjects from raw byte data. This can potentially improve performance in scenarios where responses are received as byte streams.Consider adding error handling for the case where both
resultRawanderrBytesare empty, as this might indicate an invalid response.
83-121: Comprehensive ID parsing inparseIDmethodThe
parseIDmethod effectively handles various ID types and edge cases, including numeric strings. However, the error handling for the final marshaling step could be improved.Consider wrapping the error returned from
SonicCfg.Marshal(r.id)with additional context:- return err + return fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal parsed ID: %w", err)This will provide more informative error messages if marshaling fails.
165-208: Memory-efficientParseFromStreammethod with room for improvementThe
ParseFromStreammethod efficiently parses a JSON-RPC response usingast.Searcher, which avoids loading the entire response into memory. This is a significant improvement for handling large responses.However, the method doesn't handle the case where neither "result" nor "error" fields are present in the response. Consider adding an explicit error for this case:
} else if err := r.ParseError(util.Mem2Str(data)); err != nil { return err } +} else { + return fmt.Errorf("invalid JSON-RPC response: missing both result and error fields") }This will ensure that invalid responses are properly handled and reported.
210-275: Robust error parsing with increased complexityThe
ParseErrormethod has been significantly improved to handle various error formats, including non-standard structures. This enhancement increases the robustness of error handling in the system.However, the increased complexity might make future maintenance more challenging. Consider refactoring the special case handling into separate helper functions to improve readability and maintainability. For example:
func (r *JsonRpcResponse) ParseError(raw string) error { r.errMu.Lock() defer r.errMu.Unlock() r.errBytes = nil if err := r.parseStandardError(raw); err == nil { return nil } if err := r.parseSpecialCase1(raw); err == nil { return nil } if err := r.parseSpecialCase2(raw); err == nil { return nil } // Default case r.Error = NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( int(JsonRpcErrorServerSideException), raw, "", ) return nil }This structure would make the main method more readable and easier to extend with new special cases in the future.
342-397: EfficientGetReadermethod with room for improvementThe new
GetReadermethod is an excellent addition, providing a custom implementation for marshalling JSON-RPC responses with minimal memory allocations. The use ofio.MultiReaderis a smart choice for performance optimization.Consider the following improvements:
Error handling: The error from
SonicCfg.Marshal(r.Error)is properly handled, but you might want to add context to the error message.Resource management: Consider using a sync.Pool for the slice of readers to reduce allocations in high-frequency scenarios.
Example implementation for point 1:
- return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to marshal error: %w", err)
428-475: ComprehensiveUnmarshalJSONmethod with room for improvementThe new
UnmarshalJSONmethod forJsonRpcRequesteffectively handles various ID types and edge cases. However, the ID parsing logic is complex and contains some duplication. Consider refactoring this method to improve readability and maintainability:
- Extract the ID parsing logic into a separate method, similar to the
parseIDmethod inJsonRpcResponse.- Use a switch statement instead of nested if-else blocks for cleaner code structure.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
func (r *JsonRpcRequest) parseID(rawID json.RawMessage) error { if rawID == nil { r.ID = util.RandomID() return nil } var id interface{} if err := SonicCfg.Unmarshal(rawID, &id); err != nil { return err } switch v := id.(type) { case float64: r.ID = int64(v) case string: if v == "" { r.ID = util.RandomID() } else { parsedID, err := strconv.ParseInt(v, 10, 64) if err != nil { return err } r.ID = parsedID } case nil: r.ID = util.RandomID() default: r.ID = util.RandomID() } if r.ID == 0 { r.ID = util.RandomID() } return nil } func (r *JsonRpcRequest) UnmarshalJSON(data []byte) error { type Alias JsonRpcRequest aux := &struct { *Alias ID json.RawMessage `json:"id,omitempty"` }{ Alias: (*Alias)(r), } aux.JSONRPC = "2.0" if err := SonicCfg.Unmarshal(data, &aux); err != nil { return err } return r.parseID(aux.ID) }This refactoring separates concerns, reduces nesting, and makes the code more maintainable.
upstream/http_json_rpc_client.go (3)
172-182: LGTM! Enhanced logging for better observability.The addition of detailed logging in the
queueRequestmethod significantly improves the observability of batch processing. This will be valuable for debugging and monitoring.Consider using structured logging (e.g., adding fields like
batchSizeinstead of formatting them into the message) for easier parsing and analysis of logs.
Line range hint
204-274: LGTM! Improved batch processing with better logging and error handling.The enhancements to the
processBatchmethod, including additional logging and improved error handling, are excellent improvements. The use ofcommon.SonicCfg.Marshalfor JSON marshaling ensures consistency across the project.Consider wrapping the error returned from
http.NewRequestWithContextwith additional context about the batch processing to make debugging easier.
Line range hint
579-821: LGTM! Greatly improved error handling and categorization.The extensive additions to the
extractJsonRpcErrorfunction significantly improve error handling and categorization. This will provide more meaningful and specific error responses, aiding in debugging and error management.Consider refactoring some of the longer condition checks (e.g., lines 722-725, 748-751) into separate helper functions for improved readability and maintainability.
erpc/http_server_test.go (3)
725-773: Good start on integration tests, consider expandingThe addition of
TestHttpServer_IntegrationTestsis a valuable step towards ensuring the system works correctly as a whole. The test case for an unsupported method with DRPC is a good start.Consider adding more integration test cases in the future to cover a wider range of scenarios and increase the overall test coverage.
Line range hint
843-909: Remove duplicatecreateServerTestFixturesfunctionThere's an exact duplicate of the
createServerTestFixturesfunction in the file. This duplication should be removed to avoid confusion and maintain code cleanliness.Please remove this duplicate function implementation.
Line range hint
1-1007: Overall improvements to test coverage and reliabilityThe changes to this file significantly enhance the test suite for the HTTP server. New test functions for multiple upstreams and integration tests improve coverage, while adjustments to timeouts and configurations likely increase test reliability.
However, there are duplicate functions that need to be removed:
- A duplicate
createServerTestFixturesfunction- A duplicate
TestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreamsfunctionOnce these duplications are addressed, the test file will be in excellent shape, providing comprehensive coverage of various scenarios and edge cases.
Please remove the identified duplicate functions to finalize these improvements.
erpc/networks_test.go (3)
Line range hint
37-40: Consider using a constant for the TRUE value.The
TRUEvariable is defined as a global variable. It might be better to define it as a constant for clarity and to prevent accidental modification.Consider changing the declaration to:
-var TRUE = true +const TRUE = true
Line range hint
42-1275: TestNetwork_Forward function is comprehensive but could be split for better readability.The
TestNetwork_Forwardfunction is quite long and contains multiple sub-tests. While it's good to have comprehensive tests, the function's length might make it difficult to maintain and understand.Consider splitting this function into multiple smaller test functions, each focusing on a specific aspect of the Network's Forward functionality. This would improve readability and make it easier to maintain and extend the tests in the future.
For example, you could have separate test functions for:
- Rate limiting scenarios
- Error handling and retries
- Caching behavior
- Concurrent request handling
Each of these could be a separate function with its own sub-tests.
Line range hint
1891-1909: setupMocksForEvmStatePoller function could be more flexible.While the
setupMocksForEvmStatePollerfunction serves its purpose, it uses hardcoded values for the mock responses.Consider parameterizing this function to allow for more flexible testing scenarios. For example:
func setupMocksForEvmStatePoller(blockNumber string) { // ... use blockNumber in the mock responses ... }This would allow tests to use different block numbers without modifying the function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
- common/errors.go (14 hunks)
- common/json_rpc.go (4 hunks)
- common/request.go (12 hunks)
- common/response.go (6 hunks)
- erpc/http_server_test.go (7 hunks)
- erpc/networks.go (11 hunks)
- erpc/networks_test.go (80 hunks)
- test/fake_server.go (4 hunks)
- upstream/http_json_rpc_client.go (22 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/test.yml
6-6: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
🔇 Additional comments (47)
.github/workflows/test.yml (2)
28-28:⚠️ Potential issueFix Codecov configuration
The Codecov step configuration has been incorrectly modified. The
tokeninput has been replaced withargs, and the value is identical to the Gosec Security Scanner step. This will prevent Codecov from authenticating and uploading the coverage report.Please revert this change and use the correct Codecov configuration:
- name: Upload coverage reports to Codecov uses: codecov/[email protected] with: token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}If you need to pass additional arguments to Codecov, please refer to the Codecov GitHub Action documentation for the correct syntax and available options.
6-6: Verify the runner label "large"The
runs-onvalue has been changed tolarge, which is not a standard GitHub-hosted runner label. This change might be intentional if you're using a custom self-hosted runner, but it could lead to workflow failures if not properly configured.Please confirm one of the following:
- If "large" is a custom label for a self-hosted runner, ensure it's properly set up in your GitHub organization or repository settings.
- If you intended to use a GitHub-hosted runner with more resources, consider using one of the following labels instead:
ubuntu-latest-16-coresfor a larger Ubuntu runnerwindows-latest-8-coresfor a larger Windows runnermacos-latest-xlormacos-latest-largefor a larger macOS runnerTo verify the available runners, you can run this script:
This will help ensure consistency across your workflows and prevent potential issues.
✅ Verification successful
Runner label "large" is consistently used across workflows
The
"large"runner label appears in multiple workflow files, indicating it is likely a custom self-hosted runner. Ensure that the"large"runner is properly configured in your GitHub organization or repository settings to prevent workflow failures.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all workflow files and grep for 'runs-on' to see what runners are used across the repository fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows --exec grep -H 'runs-on:' {} \;Length of output: 336
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
6-6: label "large" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-14.0", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-13.0", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "macos-12.0", "macos-11", "macos-11.0", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
test/fake_server.go (4)
136-156: Well-implemented batch request handlingThe
handleBatchRequestmethod is a solid implementation of batch request processing as per the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification. It correctly handles empty batch requests, processes each request individually, and efficiently collects and sends responses.
158-173: Efficient single request handlingThe
handleSingleRequestmethod is well-implemented. It correctly processes single JSON-RPC requests, sets appropriate headers, and efficiently determines the content length using a buffer before writing the response. The error handling is also appropriate.
237-249: Consistent error response handlingThe
sendErrorResponsemethod is a well-implemented utility for sending error responses. It correctly updates the server statistics and follows the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification for error response structure. This addition enhances the consistency of error handling across the server.
Line range hint
1-305: Overall improvements to FakeServer implementationThe changes to
test/fake_server.gosignificantly enhance the functionality and robustness of the FakeServer. Key improvements include:
- Better handling of both batch and single JSON-RPC requests.
- More consistent and comprehensive error handling.
- Improved simulation of various scenarios (rate limiting, failures).
- Addition of large response generation for testing purposes.
These changes make the FakeServer more compliant with the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification and more useful for testing scenarios. The suggested improvements in the review comments will further enhance its reliability and effectiveness.
common/request.go (8)
5-5: LGTM: Import statements and constant declarationThe new import statements are appropriate for the changes made in the file. The constant declaration for
RequestContextKeyfollows proper naming conventions.Also applies to: 7-7, 10-10, 15-16
49-49: Improved thread-safety in NormalizedRequest structThe changes to
uid,lastValidResponse, andlastUpstreamfields using atomic types enhance thread-safety by allowing concurrent access without explicit locking. This is a good improvement for concurrent operations.Also applies to: 54-55
99-99: Thread-safe updates to SetLastValidResponse and LastValidResponse methodsThe changes to use
atomic.Pointer.Store()andatomic.Pointer.Load()provide thread-safe access to thelastValidResponsefield. This is a good improvement for concurrent operations.Also applies to: 106-106
190-193: Improved memory efficiency in ApplyDirectivesFromHttpThe consistent use of
util.Mem2Str()instead of direct string conversions is a good change. This likely improves memory usage by avoiding unnecessary string allocations when working withfasthttptypes.Also applies to: 196-196, 200-200, 204-204, 208-208
299-299: Consistent use of memory-efficient operations and configured JSON marshalingThe changes in
MarshalZerologObjectandMarshalJSONmethods are good:
- The use of
util.Mem2Str()inMarshalZerologObjectis consistent with other changes for memory efficiency.- The use of
SonicCfg.MarshalinMarshalJSONis consistent with the change in theJsonRpcRequestmethod, using the configured Sonic JSON parser.These changes improve consistency and potentially performance across the codebase.
Also applies to: 340-342, 346-346
Line range hint
1-365: Summary of changes in common/request.goThe changes in this file significantly improve thread-safety and memory efficiency:
- Use of atomic types for concurrent access to shared fields.
- Consistent use of
util.Mem2Str()for memory-efficient string operations.- Use of a configured Sonic JSON parser for potentially improved JSON handling.
Most changes are improvements, but the
Idmethod needs refactoring for consistency and simplicity. Overall, these changes enhance the robustness and performance of theNormalizedRequeststruct and its methods.
253-253: Use of configured Sonic JSON parserThe change to use
SonicCfg.Unmarshalinstead ofsonic.Unmarshalis good, as it likely uses a pre-configured instance of the Sonic JSON parser with specific settings.To ensure the correct configuration is being used, please verify the
SonicCfgsetup:Review the results to confirm that
SonicCfgis properly configured for your use case.✅ Verification successful
SonicCfg Configuration Properly Implemented
The
SonicCfgis consistently used across the codebase, indicating proper configuration of the Sonic JSON parser.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SonicCfg configuration rg -n "SonicCfg" --type goLength of output: 2635
Line range hint
116-170: Refactor Id method for consistency and simplicityThe
Idmethod has undergone significant changes, but there are several issues to address:
- The change in return type from
stringtoint64may affect other parts of the codebase that expect a string ID.- The parsing logic is complex and could be simplified.
- There's redundant locking and unlocking.
- The method doesn't handle all possible ID types consistently.
Consider refactoring the method as follows:
- Use a single atomic operation to get and set the ID.
- Simplify the parsing logic.
- Handle all ID types consistently.
Here's a suggested refactor:
func (r *NormalizedRequest) Id() int64 { if r == nil { return 0 } if id := r.uid.Load(); id != nil { return id.(int64) } var newId int64 if r.jsonRpcRequest != nil { newId = r.jsonRpcRequest.ID } else if len(r.body) > 0 { if idNode, err := sonic.Get(r.body, "id"); err == nil { switch v := idNode.Interface().(type) { case string: if parsed, err := strconv.ParseInt(v, 10, 64); err == nil { newId = parsed } case float64: newId = int64(v) case int64: newId = v } } } r.uid.Store(newId) return newId }This refactored version:
- Uses a single atomic operation to get and set the ID.
- Simplifies the parsing logic.
- Handles string, float64, and int64 ID types consistently.
- Removes redundant locking.
To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following verification script:
Review the results to ensure that all callers of
Id()can handle anint64return type.erpc/networks.go (8)
79-80: Reconsider logging pointer addressesWhile logging the pointer address (
fmt.Sprintf("%p", req)) can be useful for debugging, it might expose internal memory details. Consider if this level of detail is necessary for production logging, and if not, make it conditional based on a debug flag.
121-124: Consider re-throwing panics after loggingThe panic recovery is a good practice, but simply logging the panic without re-throwing it might mask underlying issues. Consider re-throwing the panic after logging to ensure that the error is not silently ignored, as suggested in the existing comment.
221-224: LGTM: Improved context cancellation handlingThe additional error checking for context cancellation enhances the robustness of the request handling process. This change ensures that the function promptly responds to cancellation signals, improving resource management.
246-250: LGTM: Enhanced response and hedged request handlingThe additions improve error handling for response normalization and provide better insight into hedged request cancellations. These changes enhance the overall robustness and observability of the request processing pipeline.
Also applies to: 252-252, 255-257
367-370: LGTM: Improved null checks in EvmIsBlockFinalizedThe addition of null checks for the network and evmStatePollers prevents potential nil pointer dereferences, enhancing the function's robustness and safety.
415-424: LGTM: Improved error handling in enrichStatePollerThe additional error checking for parsing block numbers and updating the state poller enhances the function's robustness. These changes align with the existing comment's suggestion to add nil checks before accessing upstream configurations.
435-435: LGTM: Improved error handling in normalizeResponseThe function now returns an error, and additional error handling has been added for setting the JSON-RPC response ID. These changes enhance the robustness of the response normalization process and align with the existing comment's suggestion to handle errors when obtaining JSON-RPC responses.
Also applies to: 441-448, 453-454
Line range hint
1-504: Overall improvements in error handling and robustnessThe changes in this file significantly enhance error handling, null checks, and overall robustness of the network operations. The use of
sync.Mapfor in-flight requests and the improvements in context and response handling are particularly noteworthy. While some potential issues were identified (such as logging pointer addresses and panic handling), the majority of the changes represent positive improvements to the codebase.common/json_rpc.go (5)
22-45: Improved thread-safety and memory efficiency inJsonRpcResponsestructThe restructuring of the
JsonRpcResponsestruct with the addition of mutexes and byte slices for lazy loading is a significant improvement. This change enhances thread safety for concurrent access and potentially reduces memory usage, especially for large responses.
48-58: Improved type safety inNewJsonRpcResponsefunctionThe change in the function signature to accept
int64for the ID improves type safety and aligns with the newJsonRpcResponsestruct definition. This modification reduces the need for type assertions and potential runtime errors.
419-425: Improved type safety inJsonRpcRequeststructThe change of the
IDfield type frominterface{}toint64in theJsonRpcRequeststruct is a positive improvement. This change enhances type safety, reduces the need for type assertions, and aligns with the modifications made toJsonRpcResponse. It should also lead to better performance and easier handling of request IDs throughout the codebase.
590-608: Enhanced error handling inTranslateToJsonRpcExceptionThe additions to the
TranslateToJsonRpcExceptionfunction improve error handling by providing more specific JSON-RPC error codes for different types of errors. The new cases forErrCodeUpstreamMethodIgnoredandErrCodeJsonRpcRequestUnmarshalallow for more precise error reporting, which should lead to easier debugging and better error handling for clients.These changes align well with the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification and common practices for error handling in RPC systems.
Line range hint
1-624: Overall assessment: Significant improvements with minor suggestions for refinementThe changes made to
common/json_rpc.gorepresent a substantial improvement to the codebase. Key enhancements include:
- Improved thread safety through the use of mutexes.
- Better memory efficiency with lazy loading and byte slice usage.
- Enhanced error handling with more specific error codes and robust parsing.
- New methods for efficient response creation and marshalling.
While the overall direction is very positive, there are a few areas where minor refinements could further improve the code:
- Some error handling could be more informative by adding context to returned errors.
- Complex methods like
ParseErrorandUnmarshalJSONforJsonRpcRequestcould benefit from refactoring for improved readability and maintainability.- Consider adding more comprehensive input validation in some methods.
These suggestions aside, the changes significantly enhance the robustness and efficiency of the JSON-RPC handling in the system.
upstream/http_json_rpc_client.go (5)
Line range hint
14-18: LGTM! Improved JSON parsing and utility imports.The switch to
sonic/astfor JSON parsing and the addition of custom utility imports are good improvements. This change likely enhances the flexibility and performance of JSON handling in the client.
Line range hint
460-501: LGTM! Improved single request handling.The changes to the
sendSingleRequestmethod, including the use ofcommon.SonicCfg.Marshalfor JSON marshaling and the improved error handling, are good improvements. The chained method calls for creating the normalized response enhance readability.
838-853: LGTM! Improved handling of reverted transactions.The addition of specific error handling for reverted transactions is a valuable improvement. This will help in identifying and properly handling these common scenarios in blockchain interactions.
Line range hint
1-857: Overall, excellent improvements to the HTTP JSON-RPC client.The changes in this file significantly enhance the client's functionality, error handling, and observability. Key improvements include:
- Better batch processing and logging
- More comprehensive error handling and categorization
- Improved JSON parsing using AST
- Enhanced handling of reverted transactions
Please address the potential nil pointer dereference in the
getJsonRpcResponseFromNodefunction and consider the suggested minor improvements for logging and code organization. These changes will further increase the robustness and maintainability of the client.
407-442:⚠️ Potential issueGood addition, but fix potential nil pointer dereference.
The new
getJsonRpcResponseFromNodefunction is a good addition that leverages the AST-based parsing approach. However, there's a potential nil pointer dereference in the error handling case.Fix the nil pointer dereference by initializing
jrRespbefore using it:if rawResultErr != nil && rawErrorErr != nil { - var jrResp *common.JsonRpcResponse + jrResp := &common.JsonRpcResponse{} if rawID != "" { err := jrResp.SetIDBytes(util.Str2Mem(rawID)) if err != nil { return nil, err } } cause := fmt.Sprintf("cannot parse json rpc response from upstream, for result: %s, for error: %s", rawResult, rawError) - jrResp = &common.JsonRpcResponse{ - Result: util.Str2Mem(rawResult), - Error: common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( - int(common.JsonRpcErrorParseException), - cause, - "", - ), - } + jrResp.Result = util.Str2Mem(rawResult) + jrResp.Error = common.NewErrJsonRpcExceptionExternal( + int(common.JsonRpcErrorParseException), + cause, + "", + ) return jrResp, nil }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
erpc/http_server_test.go (5)
38-38: Improved test reliability with adjusted timeoutsThe changes to the
MaxTimeoutand mock response delays are likely to make the tests more stable and less prone to race conditions. This is a good improvement for test reliability.Also applies to: 145-145, 154-154, 164-164, 176-176, 215-215
616-723: Excellent addition of multi-upstream test scenariosThe new
TestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreamsfunction significantly improves test coverage by including scenarios for multiple upstreams. It correctly tests upstream selection based on both headers and query parameters, which is crucial for the server's functionality.
775-841: Improved flexibility in test fixture creationThe updates to
createServerTestFixturesenhance its flexibility and reusability. The newsendRequestfunction with support for headers and query parameters allows for more comprehensive testing of various request configurations.
Line range hint
911-1007: Remove duplicateTestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreamsfunctionThere's an exact duplicate of the
TestHttpServer_MultipleUpstreamsfunction at the end of the file. This duplication should be removed to avoid confusion and maintain code cleanliness.This issue was previously identified in a past review comment. Please remove this duplicate function implementation.
291-293:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid in-place modification of shared configuration
Modifying the shared
cfgvariable in-place within the loop can cause unintended side effects between test cases, potentially leading to flaky tests. Consider creating a fresh copy of thecfgfor each iteration to ensure test isolation.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
for _, applyCfgOverride := range cfgCases { + cfgCopy := *cfg // Create a shallow copy of cfg + applyCfgOverride(&cfgCopy) + sendRequest, baseURL := createServerTestFixtures(&cfgCopy, t) - applyCfgOverride(cfg) - sendRequest, baseURL := createServerTestFixtures(cfg, t)Likely invalid or redundant comment.
erpc/networks_test.go (6)
Line range hint
1-35: Imports and package declaration look good.The file starts with the appropriate package declaration and imports necessary packages for testing, including standard library packages and custom packages from the project. The import list is well-organized and doesn't contain any unused imports.
Line range hint
1277-1451: TestNetwork_InFlightRequests is well-structured with good coverage of concurrent scenarios.This test function covers various scenarios for in-flight requests, including successful concurrent requests, failures, timeouts, and mixed success/failure cases. The use of goroutines and wait groups is appropriate for testing concurrent behavior.
Line range hint
1453-1720: Good coverage of edge cases in TestNetwork_InFlightRequests.The additional test cases for JSON-RPC ID consistency, context cancellation, and long-running requests provide good coverage of important edge cases. The use of atomic operations and careful checking of in-flight request counts demonstrates attention to detail in concurrent scenarios.
Line range hint
1722-1889: setupTestNetwork helper function is well-designed.The
setupTestNetworkfunction provides a clean way to set up a test environment for the Network. It includes proper error checking and allows for customization of the upstream configuration.
Line range hint
1911-1920: Helper functions for gock management are useful.The
anyTestMocksLeftandresetGockfunctions provide useful utilities for managing the gock mocking library throughout the tests. This helps ensure clean test environments between runs.
Line range hint
1922-1930: safeReadBody function is a good utility for handling request bodies.The
safeReadBodyfunction provides a safe way to read and reset the request body, which is useful for inspecting request contents in tests without interfering with subsequent operations.common/response.go (1)
218-219:⚠️ Potential issueRemove unnecessary
r.RUnlock()call inEvmBlockNumber()In the
EvmBlockNumber()method, there's a call tor.RUnlock()without a correspondingr.RLock(). This could lead to a runtime panic due to unlocking an unlocked mutex. Ensure that you acquire a read lock before unlocking, or remove the unnecessaryr.RUnlock()call.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
func (r *NormalizedResponse) EvmBlockNumber() (int64, error) { if r == nil { return 0, nil } if n := r.evmBlockNumber.Load(); n != 0 { return n, nil } - r.RUnlock() if r.request == nil { return 0, nil } // Rest of the code... }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
common/errors.go (3)
1349-1362: Introduction of 'ErrEndpointTransportFailure' improves error handlingThe addition of the
ErrEndpointTransportFailureerror type enhances the granularity of error reporting for transport-related failures when communicating with remote endpoints.
1452-1474: Addition of 'ErrEndpointRequestTooLarge' with appropriate status codeThe new
ErrEndpointRequestTooLargeerror type correctly handles scenarios where the remote endpoint indicates that the request is too large. Assigning the HTTP status codehttp.StatusRequestEntityTooLarge(413) in theErrorStatusCode()method is appropriate for this error.
976-984: Ensure all calls to 'NewErrUpstreamHedgeCancelled' include the 'cause' parameterThe function
NewErrUpstreamHedgeCancellednow accepts acauseparameter. Please verify that all invocations of this function are updated to pass the new argument to prevent any potential runtime errors.Run the following script to identify any calls missing the
causeparameter:
| // Read the request body | ||
| body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error") | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Try to unmarshal as a batch request | ||
| var batchReq []JSONRPCRequest | ||
| err = json.Unmarshal(body, &batchReq) | ||
| if err == nil { | ||
| // Handle batch request | ||
| fs.handleBatchRequest(w, batchReq) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Try to unmarshal as a single request | ||
| var singleReq JSONRPCRequest | ||
| err = json.Unmarshal(body, &singleReq) | ||
| if err == nil { | ||
| // Handle single request | ||
| fs.handleSingleRequest(w, singleReq) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Invalid JSON-RPC request | ||
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32600, "Invalid Request") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improved request handling and error management
The changes to the handleRequest method significantly enhance the server's capability to process both batch and single JSON-RPC requests. The error handling is more robust and consistent with the use of sendErrorResponse.
Consider limiting the request body size
While the changes improve request handling, reading the entire request body without size limits could lead to potential Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.
Consider implementing a size limit for the request body. Here's a suggested implementation:
+const maxBodySize = 1 << 20 // 1MB
// Read the request body
-body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body)
+body, err := io.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(r.Body, maxBodySize))
if err != nil {
fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error")
return
}
+if r.ContentLength > maxBodySize {
+ fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32600, "Request Entity Too Large")
+ return
+}This change limits the body size to 1MB and returns an error for larger requests.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Read the request body | |
| body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error") | |
| return | |
| } | |
| // Try to unmarshal as a batch request | |
| var batchReq []JSONRPCRequest | |
| err = json.Unmarshal(body, &batchReq) | |
| if err == nil { | |
| // Handle batch request | |
| fs.handleBatchRequest(w, batchReq) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| // Try to unmarshal as a single request | |
| var singleReq JSONRPCRequest | |
| err = json.Unmarshal(body, &singleReq) | |
| if err == nil { | |
| // Handle single request | |
| fs.handleSingleRequest(w, singleReq) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| // Invalid JSON-RPC request | |
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32600, "Invalid Request") | |
| } | |
| const maxBodySize = 1 << 20 // 1MB | |
| // Read the request body | |
| body, err := io.ReadAll(io.LimitReader(r.Body, maxBodySize)) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32700, "Parse error") | |
| return | |
| } | |
| if r.ContentLength > maxBodySize { | |
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32600, "Request Entity Too Large") | |
| return | |
| } | |
| // Try to unmarshal as a batch request | |
| var batchReq []JSONRPCRequest | |
| err = json.Unmarshal(body, &batchReq) | |
| if err == nil { | |
| // Handle batch request | |
| fs.handleBatchRequest(w, batchReq) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| // Try to unmarshal as a single request | |
| var singleReq JSONRPCRequest | |
| err = json.Unmarshal(body, &singleReq) | |
| if err == nil { | |
| // Handle single request | |
| fs.handleSingleRequest(w, singleReq) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| // Invalid JSON-RPC request | |
| fs.sendErrorResponse(w, nil, -32600, "Invalid Request") | |
| } |
| if txt, ok := sample.Response.Result.(string); ok { | ||
| if strings.HasPrefix(txt, "bigfake:") { | ||
| size, err := strconv.Atoi(txt[len("bigfake:"):]) | ||
| fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
| // generate a random string with the size of the number | ||
| sample.Response.Result = make([]byte, size) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve large response generation
The addition of large response generation based on the "bigfake:" prefix is a useful feature for testing. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:
- Error handling: The error from
strconv.Atoiis not being handled properly. - Empty data: The generated byte slice is not filled with any data, which might not be realistic for testing.
Consider the following improvements:
if txt, ok := sample.Response.Result.(string); ok {
if strings.HasPrefix(txt, "bigfake:") {
size, err := strconv.Atoi(txt[len("bigfake:"):])
- fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size)
if err != nil {
- return nil
+ fmt.Printf("Invalid size in bigfake prefix: %v\n", err)
+ return &sample.Response
}
+ fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size)
// generate a random string with the size of the number
- sample.Response.Result = make([]byte, size)
+ sample.Response.Result = make([]byte, size)
+ rand.Read(sample.Response.Result.([]byte))
}
}These changes improve error handling and fill the generated byte slice with random data for more realistic testing.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if txt, ok := sample.Response.Result.(string); ok { | |
| if strings.HasPrefix(txt, "bigfake:") { | |
| size, err := strconv.Atoi(txt[len("bigfake:"):]) | |
| fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return nil | |
| } | |
| // generate a random string with the size of the number | |
| sample.Response.Result = make([]byte, size) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if txt, ok := sample.Response.Result.(string); ok { | |
| if strings.HasPrefix(txt, "bigfake:") { | |
| size, err := strconv.Atoi(txt[len("bigfake:"):]) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| fmt.Printf("Invalid size in bigfake prefix: %v\n", err) | |
| return &sample.Response | |
| } | |
| fmt.Printf("Generating big response of size %d\n", size) | |
| // generate a random string with the size of the number | |
| sample.Response.Result = make([]byte, size) | |
| rand.Read(sample.Response.Result.([]byte)) | |
| } | |
| } |
|
|
||
| r.lastUpstream.Store(upstream) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thread-safe updates to SetLastUpstream and LastUpstream methods
The changes to use atomic.Value.Store() and atomic.Value.Load() provide thread-safe access to the lastUpstream field, which is a good improvement.
However, there's a redundant assignment in SetLastUpstream:
Remove the redundant assignment in SetLastUpstream:
func (r *NormalizedRequest) SetLastUpstream(upstream Upstream) *NormalizedRequest {
if r == nil {
return r
}
r.lastUpstream.Store(upstream)
- r.Lock()
- defer r.Unlock()
- r.lastUpstream = upstream
return r
}Also applies to: 88-92
| reasons = append(reasons, fmt.Sprintf("%d user errors", client)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Rename 'user errors' to 'client errors' in error summaries
In the SummarizeCauses method, the error summary uses "user errors" to represent client-side errors. For clarity and consistency, consider renaming it to "client errors" to accurately reflect the nature of these errors.
Apply this diff to make the change:
if client > 0 {
- reasons = append(reasons, fmt.Sprintf("%d user errors", client))
+ reasons = append(reasons, fmt.Sprintf("%d client errors", client))
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| reasons = append(reasons, fmt.Sprintf("%d user errors", client)) | |
| } | |
| reasons = append(reasons, fmt.Sprintf("%d client errors", client)) | |
| } |
What?
Rebasing our changes onto upstream changes.
Why?
New features and bug fixes have been released and we want to use them.
How?
Performed a rebase.
Testing?
Not yet.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
GetProjectsmethod to theERPCstruct for retrieving all managed projects.RateLimitAutoTunerwith logging capabilities.AlchemyHttpJsonRpcClient.erpcpackage to assess service status.GetMetricsTrackerin theUpstreamsRegistryfor accessing the metrics tracker.RandomIDfunction for generating unique JSON-RPC IDs.ReadAllfunction for reading fromio.Readerwith chunked processing.Bug Fixes
SupportsNetworkmethods.GetVendorSpecificErrorIfAnymethod for clearer categorization.Documentation
Tests
test/k6/run.js.