Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: xfail allocmemf90 test for solstudio #5893

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hzhou
Copy link
Contributor

@hzhou hzhou commented Mar 15, 2022

Pull Request Description

The nightly tests now fails this one after we now generates the full mpi f90 module.

Solstudio's fortran compiler forbid passing cray pointer as integer
in MPI_Alloc_mem. Since cray pointer is non-standard feature, it is not
a priority to work around. Xfail for now.

[skip warnings]

Author Checklist

  • Provide Description
    Particularly focus on why, not what. Reference background, issues, test failures, xfail entries, etc.
  • Commits Follow Good Practice
    Commits are self-contained and do not do two things at once.
    Commit message is of the form: module: short description
    Commit message explains what's in the commit.
  • Passes All Tests
    Whitespace checker. Warnings test. Additional tests via comments.
  • Contribution Agreement
    For non-Argonne authors, check contribution agreement.
    If necessary, request an explicit comment from your companies PR approval manager.

Solstudio's fortran compiler forbid passing cray pointer as integer
in MPI_Alloc_mem. Since cray pointer is non-standard feature, it is not
a priority to work around. Xfail for now.
@hzhou
Copy link
Contributor Author

hzhou commented Mar 15, 2022

test:mpich/custom/pipeline
netmod: ch3:tcp
label: solaris
compiler: solstudio

@hzhou hzhou requested a review from raffenet March 16, 2022 14:46
test: xfail allocmemf90 test for solstudio

Approved-by: Ken Raffenetti
@hzhou hzhou closed this Mar 16, 2022
@hzhou hzhou deleted the 2203_xfail_allocmemf branch March 16, 2022 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants