Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove user-configuration of port #824

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Remove user-configuration of port #824

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented Feb 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Streamlined device setup by removing the manual network port option. The system now automatically applies a default port, simplifying the configuration process and reducing potential setup issues.

@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner February 4, 2025 18:50
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the Plugwise integration by removing user-configurable port settings. The changelog now includes an "Ongoing" section to document this change. In the configuration flow, the optional port field has been removed from the user schema, and a default port is now automatically assigned in the async_step_user method. The associated tests have also been updated to no longer supply a port explicitly.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added a new "Ongoing" section noting that user-configuration of the port has been removed.
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py
tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py
Removed the optional CONF_PORT from the user input schema in the configuration flow and added a default port assignment. The test now omits an explicit port, aligning with the new default behavior.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant CF as ConfigFlow
    participant SYS as System

    U->>CF: Submit configuration input (without port)
    CF->>CF: Assign DEFAULT_PORT to input data
    CF->>SYS: Process configuration with default port
    SYS-->>CF: Return connection status
    CF-->>U: Provide configuration result
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • CoMPaTech

Poem

I'm a happy rabbit with a code-hop beat,
No more port fuss—defaults make it neat!
I nibble bugs and hop through the flow,
With cleaner paths and tests that glow.
Code gardens flourish where configuration's light,
And every repo hop feels perfectly right!
🐰✨

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c170a9 and fb87779.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • tests/components/plugwise/test_config_flow.py
🔇 Additional comments (4)
custom_components/plugwise/config_flow.py (3)

239-239: LGTM! Default port assignment is correctly implemented.

The code now automatically assigns the default port value instead of allowing user configuration, which aligns with the PR objective.


1-364: Verify that all port-related code paths are handled.

The implementation looks good, but let's verify that all port-related code paths are properly handled:

  1. Default port assignment for manual configuration
  2. Port handling for zeroconf discovery
  3. Port usage in validate_input
✅ Verification successful

All port-related code paths are properly handled.

  • Default port is set in the manual configuration step.
  • Zeroconf discovery correctly overrides the default port with discovery info.
  • The validate_input function uses the provided port without issues.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all port-related code paths

# Test 1: Check for any remaining user-configurable port references
echo "Checking for remaining user-configurable port references..."
rg -i "port.*optional" 

# Test 2: Verify port usage in validate_input and zeroconf
echo "Verifying port usage in key functions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'validate_input($$$) { $$$port$$$}'
ast-grep --pattern 'async_step_zeroconf($$$) { $$$port$$$}'

Length of output: 363


239-243: LGTM! Port configuration changes look good.

The implementation correctly handles port assignment by:

  • Using DEFAULT_PORT for manual configuration
  • Preserving discovered port from zeroconf when available

Let's verify that DEFAULT_PORT is properly defined:

CHANGELOG.md (1)

5-8: LGTM! Changelog entry is clear and properly placed.

The changelog entry correctly documents the removal of user-configurable port settings in the "Ongoing" section for unreleased changes.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Warning while testing for RELEASED HA-core:

✔️ Success: No problem with testing against dev HA-core.
Error: Incompatible while testing against released HA-core and required to pass.

@bouwew bouwew added the require-dev-pass Require actions to pass against HA dev-branch (and silently fail on HA master-branch) label Feb 4, 2025
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Warning while testing for RELEASED HA-core:

✔️ Success: No problem with testing against dev HA-core.
⚠️ Warning: Incompatible while testing against released HA-core.

@bouwew bouwew merged commit 54d3c61 into main Feb 4, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the port-option branch February 4, 2025 19:17
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
require-dev-pass Require actions to pass against HA dev-branch (and silently fail on HA master-branch)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants