Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix make_trace_kwargs error due to deprecated append method #4156

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fix make_trace_kwargs error due to deprecated append method #4156

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

markcc309
Copy link

Very small update to core.py. Pandas has moved to 2.0, so pd.DataFrame.append is now deprecated and make_trace_kwargs throws an error.

Resolves #4025 and #4065
#4025 : concat is not a method of pd.DataFrame -- need to use pd.concat instead.
#4065: does not produce the desired output, as per example below:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# Create random 3x3 dataframe
df = pd.DataFrame(
    np.random.randint(0, 10, size=(3, 3)), 
    columns=['col1', 'col2', 'col3']
)

df_1 = pd.concat([df, df.iloc[0]], axis=0)
print(df_1)

>>>      col1  col2  col3    0
0      6.0   4.0   7.0  NaN
1      4.0   6.0   8.0  NaN
2      9.0   1.0   3.0  NaN
col1   NaN   NaN   NaN  6.0
col2   NaN   NaN   NaN  4.0
col3   NaN   NaN   NaN  7.0

df_2 = pd.concat([df, pd.DataFrame(df.iloc[0]).T], axis=0)
print(df_2)

>>>    col1  col2  col3
0     6     4     7
1     4     6     8
2     9     1     3
0     6     4     7

df_2 matches the behaviour of the old append method.

Documentation PR

  • I've seen the doc/README.md file
  • This change runs in the current version of Plotly on PyPI and targets the doc-prod branch OR it targets the master branch
  • If this PR modifies the first example in a page or adds a new one, it is a px example if at all possible
  • Every new/modified example has a descriptive title and motivating sentence or paragraph
  • Every new/modified example is independently runnable
  • Every new/modified example is optimized for short line count and focuses on the Plotly/visualization-related aspects of the example rather than the computation required to produce the data being visualized
  • Meaningful/relatable datasets are used for all new examples instead of randomly-generated data where possible
  • The random seed is set if using randomly-generated data in new/modified examples
  • New/modified remote datasets are loaded from https://plotly.github.io/datasets and added to https://github.com/plotly/datasets
  • Large computations are avoided in the new/modified examples in favour of loading remote datasets that represent the output of such computations
  • Imports are plotly.graph_objects as go / plotly.express as px / plotly.io as pio
  • Data frames are always called df
  • fig = <something> call is high up in each new/modified example (either px.<something> or make_subplots or go.Figure)
  • Liberal use is made of fig.add_* and fig.update_* rather than go.Figure(data=..., layout=...) in every new/modified example
  • Specific adders and updaters like fig.add_shape and fig.update_xaxes are used instead of big fig.update_layout calls in every new/modified example
  • fig.show() is at the end of each new/modified example
  • plotly.plot() and plotly.iplot() are not used in any new/modified example
  • Hex codes for colors are not used in any new/modified example in favour of these nice ones

Code PR

  • I have read through the contributing notes and understand the structure of the package. In particular, if my PR modifies code of plotly.graph_objects, my modifications concern the codegen files and not generated files.
  • I have added tests (if submitting a new feature or correcting a bug) or
    modified existing tests.
  • For a new feature, I have added documentation examples in an existing or
    new tutorial notebook (please see the doc checklist as well).
  • I have added a CHANGELOG entry if fixing/changing/adding anything substantial.
  • For a new feature or a change in behaviour, I have updated the relevant docstrings in the code to describe the feature or behaviour (please see the doc checklist as well).

@alexcjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @markcc309 - I included a version of this, with a test covering pandas 1 and 2, in #4190

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants