Execute Transaction<T>.Actions all or nothing at all

[dahlia]

This addresses fixes #1267.

Previously, Transaction<T>.Actions had been executed and affected states whether the actions throw an exception or not. However, as the term “transaction” in computer science in general imply it's atomic (i.e., executed all or nothing), this behavior had been quite misleading.

This patch regards such previous behavior as a bug, and fixes it so that if any action in a Transaction<T> throws an exception all actions in the transaction do not commit any state changes to the current IStore.

However, there is still a quirk for it: IActionRenderer<T> receives render events caused by unsuccessful transactions too, as it has done. In other words, transactions' atomicity still is not guaranteed for action renderers. In order to work around this quirk, this patch introduces AtomicActionRenderer<T> as well. If an IActionRenderer<T> is wrapped by AtomicActionRenderer<T> the inner action renderer will receive no RenderActionError()/UnrenderActionError() events except for block actions (since they do not belong to any transactions).

The reasons why I stick with the existing behavior for action renderers are:

• Ignoring render events from unsuccessful transactions making the current shape of IActionRenderer<T> no more natural. Because RenderActionError()/UnrenderActionError() methods are no more necessary.
• However, changing the interface breaks backward compatibility. In particular, IActionRenderer<T> is one of the key interfaces game app programmers must implement. For example, such change on the interface would require many changes on Nine Chronicles.
• We may eventually need to refactor the interface when we implement Leaving Transaction<T>s' results #1156.

For details, please read the added changelogs and XML doc comments too.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1275 (1474b66) into main (e032b8f) will increase coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 86.11%.

❗ Current head 1474b66 differs from pull request most recent head e750758. Consider uploading reports for the commit e750758 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1275      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.96%   84.11%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         402      407       +5     
  Lines       34464    34987     +523     
==========================================
+ Hits        28937    29430     +493     
- Misses       3700     3730      +30     
  Partials     1827     1827              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Libplanet/Blockchain/BlockChain.cs	90.76% <ø> (+0.83%)	⬆️
...anet/Blockchain/Renderers/DelayedActionRenderer.cs	82.40% <ø> (ø)
Libplanet/Tx/Transaction.cs	90.41% <ø> (ø)
Libplanet.Tests/Fixtures/Arithmetic.cs	44.04% <44.04%> (ø)
Libplanet.Tests/Fixtures/OperatorTypeExtensions.cs	66.66% <66.66%> (ø)
...lanet/Blockchain/Renderers/AtomicActionRenderer.cs	82.95% <82.95%> (ø)
Libplanet.Tests/Fixtures/IntegerSet.cs	92.30% <92.30%> (ø)
Libplanet.Tests/Action/ActionContextTest.cs	94.70% <100.00%> (+1.05%)	⬆️
Libplanet.Tests/Action/ActionEvaluationTest.cs	98.05% <100.00%> (+6.38%)	⬆️
...lockchain/Renderers/AnonymousActionRendererTest.cs	88.39% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 22 more

[longfin]

It seems that need to rebase.

[moreal]

Thanks to apply reviews 🙏🏻 I believe this is my last review 👍🏻

[moreal]

🚀

[dahlia]

@planetarium/libplanet PTAL.

[dahlia]

@planetarium/libplanet All green now. Please take a look again!