Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't try to catch up after slowdown when using fixed rate #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 14, 2024

Conversation

pkolaczk
Copy link
Owner

With fixed rate limit, if there is sudden slowdown and the
database can't keep up, latte should not try to issue
more requests in burst after the slow-down is over.
With this fix it will keep the maximum set rate limit.

With fixed rate limit, if there is sudden slowdown and the
database can't keep up, latte should not try to issue
more requests in burst after the slow-down is over.
With this fix it will keep the maximum set rate limit.
@pkolaczk pkolaczk merged commit 1b252a3 into main Jul 14, 2024
4 checks passed
@pkolaczk pkolaczk deleted the fix-rate-overshoot branch July 14, 2024 14:07
vponomaryov added a commit to scylladb/latte that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
This is kind of revert for the following PR:
- pkolaczk#89

We need exactly 'burst' approach and not 'skip' one.
Scylla failures will be mitigated with retries mechanism.
vponomaryov added a commit to scylladb/latte that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
This is kind of revert for the following PR:
- pkolaczk#89

We need exactly 'burst' approach and not 'skip' one.
Scylla failures will be mitigated with retries mechanism.
vponomaryov added a commit to scylladb/latte that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
This is kind of revert for the following PR:
- pkolaczk#89

We need exactly 'burst' approach and not 'skip' one.
Scylla failures will be mitigated with retries mechanism.
vponomaryov added a commit to scylladb/latte that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
This is kind of revert for the following PR:
- pkolaczk#89

We need exactly 'burst' approach and not 'skip' one.
Scylla failures will be mitigated with retries mechanism.
vponomaryov added a commit to scylladb/latte that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
This is kind of revert for the following PR:
- pkolaczk#89

We need exactly 'burst' approach and not 'skip' one.
Scylla failures will be mitigated with retries mechanism.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant