-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
redo(ticdc): support gcs scheme in redo log #7993
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
2f95fc9
to
995178d
Compare
8ec390c
to
787e913
Compare
787e913
to
d65f032
Compare
235959b
to
1f3a4bb
Compare
ea86abc
to
b5873fc
Compare
b5873fc
to
1048e69
Compare
499db42
to
66a5bf4
Compare
/run-all-tests |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 66a5bf4
|
/run-check-issue-triage-complete |
/run-kafka-integration-test |
@CharlesCheung96: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests
If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
/run-verify |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
|
||
if c.FlushIntervalInMs < MinFlushIntervalInMs { | ||
return cerror.ErrInvalidReplicaConfig.FastGenByArgs( | ||
fmt.Sprintf("The consistent.flush-interval:%d must be equal or greater than %d", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be a breaking change, also the official document recommends 500-2000.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a detailed describetion of compatibility changes in pr body and will fix official document in this pr.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #7987, close #6335
What is changed and how it works?
ConsistentConfig.ValidateAndAdjust
.Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
consistent.flush-interval
should not less than 2000. And we need update the office document.Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note