-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*: refactor Executor.Next() to receive RecordBatch #8994
Conversation
/run-all-tests |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #8994 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 67.42% 67.43% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 370 371 +1
Lines 75732 75739 +7
==========================================
+ Hits 51066 51074 +8
Misses 20169 20169
+ Partials 4497 4496 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
/run-all-tests |
Executor#Next
using ExecuteRequest
as input paramExecutor#Next
using RecordBatch
as input param
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/run-all-tests |
@zz-jason some comment addressed, PTAL if free thx |
Executor#Next
using RecordBatch
as input param
LGTM |
/run-integration-common-test |
What problem does this PR solve?
Change
Executor#Next
's method signature fromto
To make it easy to add other parameters to
Next
.What is changed and how it works?
only refactor, don't change any logic even though there are obvious optimize way exists, so it can make reviewer easier.
Check List
Tests
Code changes
Side effects
Related changes
This change is![Reviewable](https://camo.githubusercontent.com/1541c4039185914e83657d3683ec25920c672c6c5c7ab4240ee7bff601adec0b/68747470733a2f2f72657669657761626c652e696f2f7265766965775f627574746f6e2e737667)