-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
store/copr: partly revert pr/35975, do it correctly this time #55196
Conversation
Hi @tiancaiamao. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
└─Limit_12 204.80 0 cop[tikv] NULL NULL offset:0, count:100000 <memory> <disk> | ||
└─Selection_11 204.80 0 cop[tikv] NULL NULL eq(executor__issues.pt.val, 125) <memory> <disk> | ||
└─TableFullScan_10 256.00 0 cop[tikv] table:pt NULL keep order:false, stats:partial[val:missing] <memory> <disk> | ||
explain analyze select * from pt order by id limit 100; # expected distsql concurrency 7, but currently get 1, see issue #55190 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Known issue #55190
Will not be fixed in this PR.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #55196 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 74.7289% 74.8170% +0.0880%
================================================
Files 1570 1570
Lines 364634 439916 +75282
================================================
+ Hits 272487 329132 +56645
- Misses 72419 90561 +18142
- Partials 19728 20223 +495
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Defined2014, windtalker The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/ok-to-test |
Is 6.5 affected by this problem? |
Yes |
/test unit-test |
@tiancaiamao: The specified target(s) for
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@tiancaiamao: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/test check-dev |
@tiancaiamao: The specified target(s) for
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #54969
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
#55155 try to revert pr/35975 but not clean, coupling with #41500 and bring bugs. PartitionNum is 1 even on non-partitioned table.
Do it correctly in this PR.
The new behaviour now:
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.