-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
executor: remove unnecessary memory allocation in (*HashAggExec).initPartialWorkers #52418
Conversation
Hi @xzhangxian1008. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #52418 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.3769% 74.4476% +2.0706%
================================================
Files 1474 1517 +43
Lines 427589 465159 +37570
================================================
+ Hits 309476 346300 +36824
- Misses 98890 98921 +31
- Partials 19223 19938 +715
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/cc @XuHuaiyu @hawkingrei |
@xzhangxian1008 Can you add some profiler to verify your improvement. |
/retest |
ok |
/cc @hawkingrei @XuHuaiyu |
/cc @XuHuaiyu |
}, | ||
} | ||
|
||
func getBuffer() (*[][]aggfuncs.PartialResult, *[][]byte) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why use *[][]xx
instead of [][]xx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why use
*[][]xx
instead of[][]xx
It's better to return pointer type in sync.Pool, refer
/cc @XuHuaiyu |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, XuHuaiyu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
@xzhangxian1008: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
…PartialWorkers (pingcap#52418) close pingcap#52321
…PartialWorkers (pingcap#52418) close pingcap#52321
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #52321
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
no optimization
optimization
no optimization flame graph
optimization flame graph
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.