-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
workerpool: generic result type for worker pool #46185
workerpool: generic result type for worker pool #46185
Conversation
Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #46185 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 74.7668% 72.7067% -2.0602%
================================================
Files 1297 1306 +9
Lines 398753 401022 +2269
================================================
- Hits 298135 291570 -6565
- Misses 81227 90933 +9706
+ Partials 19391 18519 -872
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
@@ -308,12 +308,12 @@ func (b *ingestBackfillScheduler) setupWorkers() error { | |||
} | |||
b.copReqSenderPool = copReqSenderPool | |||
readerCnt, writerCnt := b.expectedWorkerSize() | |||
skipReg := workerpool.OptionSkipRegister[idxRecResult]{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why remove?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's make it the default skip because the feature is immature.
@ywqzzy: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The worker pool doesn't need to collect the result in theory, which makes it complex. If we need to know the result, we can wrap these workers as a WorkerWIthResult to collect the result, then include the real worker.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: GMHDBJD, wjhuang2016, ywqzzy The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #46258
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.