Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add paging explain analyze and total_process_keys test #36179

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 14, 2022

Conversation

wshwsh12
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #36178

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 13, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • XuHuaiyu
  • tiancaiamao

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 13, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 13, 2022

@wshwsh12 wshwsh12 requested review from tiancaiamao and XuHuaiyu July 13, 2022 09:02
@wshwsh12 wshwsh12 added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 13, 2022
@wshwsh12 wshwsh12 removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 13, 2022
@wshwsh12 wshwsh12 requested review from XuHuaiyu and tiancaiamao July 14, 2022 03:13
checkScanOperator := func(strs []interface{}) {
require.Equal(t, strs[2].(string), "100000")
if *realtikvtest.WithRealTiKV { // Unistore don't collect process_keys now
require.True(t, strings.Contains(strs[5].(string), "total_process_keys: 100000"), strs[5])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also check the actRows?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

strs[2].(string) is actRows

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jul 14, 2022
Comment on lines +44 to +45
// prepare data, insert 10w record
// [0, 999999]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How long does this test takes?

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Jul 14, 2022
@wshwsh12
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 8d53041

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Jul 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit be50ebc into pingcap:master Jul 14, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 14, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! New failing [2] after this pr merged.
These new failed integration tests seem to be caused by the current PR, please try to fix these new failed integration tests, thanks!

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟥 failed 1, success 5, total 6 9 min 12 sec New failing
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟥 failed 1, success 0, total 1 3 min 30 sec New failing
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test ✅ all 11 tests passed 27 min Fixed
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 36 tests passed 27 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 12 tests passed 18 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 8 min 49 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 7 min 23 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 6 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 58 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add paging explain analyze and process_keys test
5 participants