Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

planner: prepared plan cache support limit #12307

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023
Merged

planner: prepared plan cache support limit #12307

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 16, 2023

Conversation

shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

Starting from v6.6, plan cache support supports limit.

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

Tips for choosing the affected version(s):

By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.

For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v6.6 (TiDB 6.6 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.4 (TiDB 6.4 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)
  • v5.3 (TiDB 5.3 versions)
  • v5.2 (TiDB 5.2 versions)
  • v5.1 (TiDB 5.1 versions)
  • v5.0 (TiDB 5.0 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jan 30, 2023 •
edited
Loading

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Oreoxmt

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested a review from TomShawn January 30, 2023 09:17
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 30, 2023
@shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @fzzf678

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@shichun-0415: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: fzzf678.

Note that only pingcap members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

/cc @fzzf678

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@shichun-0415 shichun-0415 requested review from Oreoxmt and removed request for TomShawn January 30, 2023 09:18
@shichun-0415 shichun-0415 self-assigned this Jan 30, 2023
@shichun-0415 shichun-0415 added translation/from-docs-cn This PR is translated from a PR in pingcap/docs-cn. v6.6 and removed missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. labels Jan 30, 2023
@fzzf678
Copy link
Contributor

fzzf678 commented Jan 30, 2023

LGTM

Oreoxmt
Oreoxmt approved these changes Jan 30, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Jan 30, 2023
@shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor Author

/status LGT2

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. label Jan 30, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 6, 2023
@shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @fzzf678 @Oreoxmt

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot requested review from fzzf678 and Oreoxmt February 6, 2023 06:07
Oreoxmt
Oreoxmt reviewed Feb 8, 2023
View reviewed changes
qw4990
qw4990 approved these changes Feb 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@qw4990 qw4990 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

shichun-0415
shichun-0415 commented Feb 16, 2023
View reviewed changes
@shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: c14d31e

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 16, 2023
@shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verify

1 similar comment
@shichun-0415
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verify

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit fbf32f6 into pingcap:master Feb 16, 2023
@shichun-0415 shichun-0415 deleted the plan-cache branch February 16, 2023 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Oreoxmt Oreoxmt Oreoxmt approved these changes

@qw4990 qw4990 qw4990 approved these changes

@fzzf678 fzzf678 Awaiting requested review from fzzf678

Assignees

@shichun-0415 shichun-0415

Labels
size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. translation/from-docs-cn This PR is translated from a PR in pingcap/docs-cn. v6.6
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@shichun-0415 @ti-chi-bot @fzzf678 @qw4990 @Oreoxmt