-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify meta doc #1230
Modify meta doc #1230
Conversation
This should make some of the decisions taken more clear to people using the interface
The UTCClock is not really needed for a minimum implementation
This method is not really needed on a FrozenClock. And especially as a FrozenClock should be, well, frozen, there should be no way of modifying that information
Scheduler tasks are not part of retrieving the time and should be either handled by the implementation or by a different PSR
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ben Edmunds <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ben Edmunds <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ben Edmunds <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ben Edmunds <[email protected]>
Looks great thanks @heiglandreas |
Anything I can do to go on with this PSR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few typos sound to have truncated word/sentence
Thanks to @nicolas-grekas for spotting!
Thanks to @kylekatarnis for spotting them!
(This list is not exhaustive!) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This list is not exhaustive!) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even though that should not be necessary I'd rather keep it to make clear that there might be other packages that provide the same value. Yes, we introduced that list with "some popular packages … are". But there will be people not reading that. And the oneliner right underneath the table is catching the eye better than the message in the copy-text above.
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One remaining suggestion, but otherwise looks great!
Co-authored-by: Woody Gilk <[email protected]>
This PR contains some changes that should make it more clear why certain decissions were taken the way we took them.