-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subxt Metadata: #[no_std]
compatibility
#1401
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a262766
no-std tests and porting of subxt-metadata
tadeohepperle 8aa4bec
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle 55cfb23
update pipeline
tadeohepperle 1b4e371
fix generate custom metadata test
tadeohepperle d679e95
fix cargo run command
tadeohepperle 7954815
adjust pipeline
tadeohepperle fbee16d
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle 7aa6989
remove prelude from subxt-metadata
tadeohepperle addc4c8
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle 87200b4
revert autoformatting of Cargo.toml
tadeohepperle 57743c3
remove alloc::format! again, still causes linker errors
tadeohepperle 408f81e
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle f41f090
add no-std-build for thumbv7em-none-eabi target
tadeohepperle ce17d82
remove std feature flag
tadeohepperle 5d6e0d5
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle cb0d35d
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle d447f7c
remove libc and add small readme with test instructions
tadeohepperle 9c8fee0
Merge branch 'master' into tadeohepperle/subxt-metadata-no-std
tadeohepperle 1aebd91
change ci for nightly no std
tadeohepperle File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd incline to start this test after the following
needs: [clippy, wasm_clippy, check, wasm_check, docs]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't agree, this no-std check/test should be cheap and runs faster than for example
clippy
it's not really a test. It just checks that a binary builds without std enabled.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, we'd need to adjust the
needs: [clippy, wasm_clippy, check, wasm_check, docs]
to includeno-std-tests
as well :DThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, sounds good :)