Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use pangeo serviceAccount everywhere #613

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2020

Conversation

TomAugspurger
Copy link
Member

This makes us use the pangeo Kubernetes ServiceAccount on

  • singleuser pods
  • scheduler pods
  • worker pods

Previously, we only used it for worker pods, except for icesat which
used it for singleuser & worker.

This is in preparation for granting read / write access to a storage
bucket to the pangeo service account on the cloud backends.

cc @scottyhq @tjcrone. I don't think this requires anything on your end, since the pangeo Kubernetes Service Account should already exist. Do you see any reason not to use it for users / scheduler pods as well?

This makes us use the `pangeo` Kubernetes ServiceAccount on

* singleuser pods
* scheduler pods
* worker pods

Previously, we only used it for worker pods, except for icesat which
used it for singleuser & worker.

This is in preparation for granting read / write access to a storage
bucket to the `pangeo` service account on the cloud backends.
@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Member Author

Planning to merge this tomorrow. I think we don't want to touch prod the week since the icesat-2 hackweek is running.

@scottyhq
Copy link
Member

scottyhq commented Jun 9, 2020

Thanks @TomAugspurger - adding the same serviceaccount to all "user-associated" pods seems good to me. Feel free to merge staging and prod. We're using a separate hub for the hackweek over the next two weeks

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger merged commit 7954d55 into pangeo-data:staging Jun 10, 2020
@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger deleted the storage-account branch June 10, 2020 11:13
jhamman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants