-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: EA._from_scalars #53089
Merged
Merged
ENH: EA._from_scalars #53089
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
057586c
ENH: BaseStringArray._from_scalars
jbrockmendel edc8b9b
WIP: EA._from_scalars
jbrockmendel 5eb892f
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel e9853c8
ENH: implement EA._from_scalars
jbrockmendel 55fa286
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 5f94507
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 8c1cfce
Fix StringDtype/CategoricalDtype combine
jbrockmendel 8e2a593
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 5238141
mypy fixup
jbrockmendel b2ab1b9
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 90b373e
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 3d55300
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 7c85184
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 5993da8
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel fb1335b
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel a37de85
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 147366b
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel 685ee12
Merge branch 'main' into enh-from_scalars
jbrockmendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking aloud. Once we allow EA authors to specify their "is_scalar" passing equivalent, should that be incorporated here somehow?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Assuming at some point we add to the EADtype something like a
_is_recognized_scalar
method, the default implementation of that method might look like (assuming away NAs for the moment)We could alternately implement a default from_scalars in terms of _is_recognized_scalar. _find_compatible_dtype from #53106 could also be the primitive from which the other two are constructed (though i dont think it can be constructed from either).