-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ArrayManager] ENH: ArrayManager.convert without block fallback #40196
Conversation
numeric=numeric, | ||
timedelta=timedelta, | ||
) | ||
def _convert(arr): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not pretty but ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's not pretty about it? The inline function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
soft_convert_objects can just do this directly right? (or the copy keyword is not functioning)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently soft_convert_objects
assumes the input is object dtype, and doesn't do such checking. I assume the check could be moved into soft_convert_objects
as well (although eg for Block, which has an ObjectBlock, it knows it is ndarray[object], and such an additional check would be unnecessary)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW soft_convert_objects is only used for ObjectBlock.convert ATM, so no real harm in making it handle non-object with these extra two lines (though to get effective simplification in the BM code might need to tweak copy kwarg behavior)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok if would revisit / consolidate logic at some point here.
xref #39146