Docstring validation script: handle args/kwargs

[jorisvandenbossche]

This ensures that if you use **kwargs in the docstring Parameters, the validation script does not complain.
But it does not yet check it is actually written like that.

[pep8speaks]

Hello @jorisvandenbossche! Thanks for updating the PR.

Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. 🍻

Comment last updated on March 09, 2018 at 09:28 Hours UTC

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #20072 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #20072      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.69%   91.72%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         150      150              
  Lines       49112    49112              
==========================================
+ Hits        45035    45047      +12     
+ Misses       4077     4065      -12

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	90.1% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
#single	41.86% <ø> (ø)	⬆️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/plotting/_converter.py	66.81% <0%> (+1.73%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9119d07...066fd2f. Read the comment docs.

[TomAugspurger]

FYI, we use **kwds in some of the plotting docs. I haven't looked, but does that mess things up? We can / should just change those to **kwargs.

[jreback]

lgtm. maybe we could/should run this in our lint.sh script? (or as an additional item in the CI). Gives much more deedback than the doc-build .

[jorisvandenbossche]

Check is included for this in #20061, so closing this