feat(linter): Implement node/no-new-require rule #6615
Closed
+104
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into mainAdd the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix. You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. |
github-actions
bot
added
A-linter
|
Duplicate of #6165 |
|
Thanks for your contribution, but I think this is redundant as there's already a PR out for it. Maybe try another rule? |
|
Thanks, I didn't notice it (probably should have searched before instead of just looking for references to the issue). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rust is still pretty new to me, so please let me know if something seems incorrect.
I think the rule might be fixable. We can be pretty confident that the code is wrong and propose one of the three valid alternatives. Unfortunately, I have no idea how that would be implemented.
Ref #493.