Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add show method for character tables #37

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024
Merged

Add show method for character tables #37

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Progress towards #14

Right now Green function tables are printed identically to "actual" generic character tables. Simply because there seems to be no way to actually distinguish the two after they have been loaded.

@fingolfin fingolfin requested a review from SoongNoonien March 5, 2024 12:04
@fingolfin fingolfin closed this Mar 5, 2024
@fingolfin fingolfin reopened this Mar 5, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.85714% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 6.50%. Comparing base (2e4f691) to head (73929ab).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
src/Show.jl 92.85% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #37      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    6.36%   6.50%   +0.13%     
=========================================
  Files          60      60              
  Lines        8844    8858      +14     
=========================================
+ Hits          563     576      +13     
- Misses       8281    8282       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fingolfin fingolfin merged commit 8ff8943 into master Mar 5, 2024
9 of 12 checks passed
@fingolfin fingolfin deleted the mh/show branch March 5, 2024 13:00
@SoongNoonien
Copy link
Member

Ok, your merged faster than I could look at the changes as your requested a review :-). But I think this looks fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants