Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update golang.org/x/text to v0.3.3 #3459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2020

Conversation

jmrodri
Copy link
Member

@jmrodri jmrodri commented Jul 18, 2020

Description of the change:
Pull in CVE-2020-14040 fixed by golang.org/x/text v0.3.3.

Motivation for the change:

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

is not it a duplication of #3458?

@jmrodri
Copy link
Member Author

jmrodri commented Jul 20, 2020

is not it a duplication of #3458?

@camilamacedo86 this PR is against the v0.19.x branch.

Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 20, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

Just rebase it with the 0.19.x branch that it will fix the Markdown check.

@jmrodri jmrodri force-pushed the update-golang-text-019 branch from 8c261ef to f4ed032 Compare July 30, 2020 22:28
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2020
@estroz estroz closed this Aug 6, 2020
@estroz estroz reopened this Aug 6, 2020
@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit 4dd9248 into operator-framework:v0.19.x Aug 10, 2020
@jmrodri jmrodri deleted the update-golang-text-019 branch August 17, 2020 15:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants