-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hidden entities remain hidden upon selection #5880
Comments
I did something like this.. The user needs to select the error, but then it will force visible any entities related to the error. (I couldn't do it on hover because the hover is a css-only effect and the thing being hovered needs to be drawn already) |
cc @quincylvania - do you need this for anything on the validation branch / #5830 ? (I'll check too) |
@bhousel Yep, clicking issues issues in the pane selects the features. What do you think of generally showing the selected features no matter where the selection came from? That way we don't have to manually address every instance of feature selection. |
In 151e268 I added this for the main I haven't checked this, but I can imagine situations in the code where it can happen, such as a user searches for something hidden and clicks on it from the search results, or they click on hidden relation child in the raw member editor. |
This is behaviour exposed by the addition of QA errors where entities are linked in the error description.
Example where this can be confusing:
&map=19.20/55.35233/-1.72707
https://giant.gfycat.com/NervousSnoopyCarp.webm
Some sections of road surface area are incorrectly tagged here which ImproveOSM is flagging as missing one-way tags. Since I'm (theoretically) a user just interested in fixing road issues I have all other features disabled. At first glance it looks like these QA errors are just outdated and already fixed because the highways are definitely tagged "oneway". However, enabling the landuse features shows the real error subject was the badly mapped road area.
I see two possible solutions here:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: