Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add NsRecords API fields under designateAPI #285

Conversation

omersch381
Copy link
Contributor

So far we were using ns_records configmap to configure the pools ns records.

This patch adds the NsRecords API field as in the near future we plan to switch to those instead of configmaps.

@omersch381 omersch381 requested a review from beagles February 14, 2025 11:46
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from abays February 14, 2025 11:46
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: omersch381

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@omersch381 omersch381 force-pushed the add_ns_records_api_fields branch from 5496de7 to f379cb9 Compare February 14, 2025 12:43
So far we were using ns_records configmap to configure the pools ns
records.

This patch adds the NsRecords API field as in the near future we plan to
switch to those instead of configmaps.
@omersch381 omersch381 force-pushed the add_ns_records_api_fields branch from a66a86e to 4840fb9 Compare February 14, 2025 14:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@beagles beagles left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 14, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 962a5cb into openstack-k8s-operators:main Feb 14, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants