data/baremetal/bootstrap: increase disk size to 16GiB

[stbenjam]

Otherwise the default sysroot comes up as 2.5G which is too small, and
baremetal IPI gets errors like:

startironic.sh[25249]: write /var/tmp/storage989090957/3: no space left on device

[stbenjam]

/label platform/baremetal

[stbenjam]

/test govet

[metal3ci]

Build FAILURE, see build http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/1304/

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stbenjam: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade	39c16fd	link	/test e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7	39c16fd	link	/test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt	39c16fd	link	/test e2e-libvirt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[celebdor]

/approve

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: celebdor, stbenjam
To complete the pull request process, please assign crawford
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @crawford in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[hardys]

So I think now that coreos/coreos-assembler#924 merged we just need to pick up a new RHCOS build to fix this but not yet tested to confirm

[stbenjam]

So I think now that coreos/coreos-assembler#924 merged we just need to pick up a new RHCOS build to fix this but not yet tested to confirm

Tested locally and worked for me. I think we can drop this patch from dev-scripts, openshift-metal3/dev-scripts#852.

If that works we can probably just close this - I don't think it makes sense to offer customization for the bootstrap's disk size, does it?

[hardys]

Tested locally and worked for me.

I assumed we'd need another rhcos version bump to pick up the latest cosa changes, any idea how/why that fixed things with the existing image?

Edit - nvm I see you were testing with #2666 so I agree we can probably close this and just get the version bump in to resolve the problem

[hardys]

If that works we can probably just close this

openshift-metal3/dev-scripts#852 worked and I merged it so we can go ahead and close this I think

[stbenjam]

/close

[openshift-ci-robot]

@stbenjam: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.